Charging by the minute to use the internet

United States
June 15, 2008 1:30pm CST
I just heard on my local news that three major broadband companies are planning to set up plans similar to cell phones where you get a set amount of minutes and if you go over those minutes, you get charged extra. Now, maybe my local news media is wrong like they were with the Stevia being used in diet cola story (this refers to a discussion I started earlier). But, it got me thinking. Do you think it's a good idea? I think it's a bad idea because I often just leave the computer on because I have applications and widgets running that I like to use. I also think I pay way too much anyway. The main reason why I got broadband was so that I can use the phone and the internet at the same time. But, now, I use my computer like a second TV.
13 people like this
38 responses
@zweeb82 (5653)
• Malaysia
17 Jun 08
In our place we have different types of packages. The one I'm using is a unlimted package. There are also packages where they offer you like 20hrs & after that they charge you by the minute, something like that.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Jun 08
Are the prices pretty reasonable? I would be willing to use the internet less if it meant that they would cut my bill in half. Right now, I am on the internet way more than 20 hours in a week, alone. I would like to stay on all day. But, if they cut my bill, I can make the sacrifice to use less.
2 people like this
@zweeb82 (5653)
• Malaysia
17 Jun 08
The catch is the speed would be slower. The unlimited 1 I'm using is RM88@1M. There's another one that's RM77 but that's a minimum 2yr contract which happens during promotion periods. Different packages they throw in free ADSL modems. There's another 1 that's RM66 @512K. I think the 20hrs 1 is 386K. Still it's faster than dial-up anytime. So I guess it's dependant on the usage of the user. Like some they charge an extra RM11 without free modem but the modem they give you is on rental
2 people like this
@zweeb82 (5653)
• Malaysia
21 Jun 08
Some Of The More Common Packages Available - Here's roughly what's available. One of the main service providers in our country
Check this out. It's not the most recently updated as now they also do offer packages on free fixed/ land lines but this is roughly what's available so you could get a clearer picture
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I guess the problem is that some users hog the bandwidth, but going back to charging by the minute is completely unacceptable to me, and I am sure it would be to a whole lot of others as well. If they do it, I am sure someone will find a way around it.
2 people like this
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I like the idea of varying the rates according to the speed as that would corral the "abusers" as the greedy broadband providers call them. I would settle for a bit lower speed in exchange for "always on" as we have come to depend on the availability of information.
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Jun 08
Oh ,I sure hope you are right. Just that fighting with Microsoft - can that be done? Maybe they could do something like charge for those that use more and still remain free for home users or something like that. OR base it on what you do use the internet for, but then again, they contrl the internet, now they can control our lives. Congress or whoever need to start making plans to block this at ever intersection it can go. IN the end it will be charging the world, which will beowned by the internet which will be owned by ________________? Rather scary when you think about it on down the line!
• United States
19 Jun 08
That would be the very worst thing for me. I have the internet on from around 3:30 in the morning until around 8pm at night or later, then you have four kids and my husband. No thank you. I have internet with AT&T, formerly BellSouth and I do not plan to leave. I have looked at other plans that they can't match what I have for what I pay.
2 people like this
• United States
19 Jun 08
That would be hard with a multi-user household. Hopefully, At&t isn't going to do this, or if they are, they give you a reasonable amount of hours for free.
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jun 08
Well it would be one way to get me to stop using the internet so much. Might even save some electricity money cause there would be no need to turn on the computer. Since we homeschool something like this would be catastrophic. It would definitely make it much harder to do what needs to be done. I think I need to inquire before I get myself all worked up over this.
@Rozie37 (15499)
• Turkmenistan
16 Jun 08
This is just a new way they have found to over-charge us for things that we have come to depend on. I can make it without a cell phone, but I would be completely lost without my interent service.
2 people like this
• United States
17 Jun 08
I'm the same way. And, I think the rest of the world is beginning to get internet dependent more, too.
1 person likes this
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I first heard this "news" a couple of years ago. It didn't happen then and I doubt that it ever will. Actually, it sounds like something the cable companies would like people to believe so that they can get more customers for their online services LOL
2 people like this
• United States
16 Jun 08
It's entirely possible that they are putting this out in the media to see what the reaction would be. I think some of my local media stations need to hire new fact checkers if I find out that this isn't true.
1 person likes this
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
16 Jun 08
That's a possibility, that they want to see the public reaction. I hope they see from sites like this one and realize their idea stinks!
2 people like this
@lamcouz (101)
• Australia
16 Jun 08
Oh my god. I would say that internet is my 2nd life, and I need to use it every day and every hour, for work, studies and entertainment!! I love having unlimited internet quota but not charging by minute usage!! i am strongly against it.
2 people like this
• United States
16 Jun 08
I would have to go to another place to use the internet part of the time. I bought a computer for my home so that I didn't have to do that.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Jun 08
You and the rest of the world! Ergo they will get what they want cause they can! They got you over a barrel. What would you do if this happened next week? What would you cut out, how much would you have to give up, what would you have to do without...and all over how much? We will all pay it as our lives are rather dependent on it.
@mtdewgurl74 (18151)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I think this is terrible! Just another way to get more money out of a dry turnip..sorry for the saying it is silly I know. It seems like we are being told how much we can surf and stay on others wise we pay the conquences if we use more then they set up for us. I for one think it is a really stupid idea and it is just more ways to get money out of us. I have friends and family who leave theirs on(I don't) but I guess that will cut down on alot of things and especially downloading and leaving pc on while you do it. it is a shame.
1 person likes this
@mtdewgurl74 (18151)
• United States
17 Jun 08
They will lose alot of business if they do it this way.. they just want a piece of that pie that is floating around the net.
• United States
16 Jun 08
I'm sure they will have an "unlimited minutes" plan like they do on some cell phones. If they are going to charge me more, I sure hope that I get more for my money. I already pay for a lot of things on the internet already.
• United States
15 Jun 08
I wonder if that's a regional thing? I haven't heard that one. It sounds similar to AOL's old dial up service, where you had to pay by the minute (and the overages--I remember getting several $400 bills because my ex loved being online!) I hope not--I live for broadband (even though my company is gouging me again!)
• United States
15 Jun 08
I wonder if there is a way to block that change. It sounds like they're definitely going to do that. I hope they warn me before they do because they didn't warn me about my last price increase. I don't know if it's regional or not. The three companies are nationwide, I think.
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Jun 08
I've got to call my company tomorrow (the joys of being on hold--goody!) about several things--I thought I had put that through (paying last month), but my promised $25 credit (for not having service for half the month) isn't there! What are the three companies--I'm betting two of them are Verizon and Comcast.
1 person likes this
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
16 Jun 08
Not Verizon, they've said nothing about it in their newsletters and they have just recently raised the DSL rate a couple of bucks :)
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
Darlene I can not see it happening with out a major revolt. My computer here at home is left on always unless there is a storm in the area. Another thing is that our shop computers are left on because of work related things. Many companies must leave computers left on. I have my DSL through my telephone company, phone service and DSL comes to 72.00 a month not including long distance. I have the cheapest package offered.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
I wonder if there's a way we can voice our displeasure with the broadband companies that are doing this. They shouldn't charge more without giving me more and better service. I am not going to switch providers, yet, because I want to see what they are going to offer in the way of plans.
• United States
16 Jun 08
Yeah, I can't see this happening without causing the internet to collapse in on it self, or more then half of the people that use it dropping it completely. Not only will it screw with the internet in it's entieriety but it will mess up the outside world as well. If they were to do something this is neither the time, or the place to do it. The economy is bad enough as it is, something like this could result in the crash of the economy and that's definitely a big no-no You could probably start some sort of petition whether in person or virtually(would be a lot easier, and able to hit a much bigger audience) and send it to whatever companies are trying to do something such as this. Or possibly try to contest it in some court of law as it does kind of cross with some of the constitution if you really dig deep into it and think about it.
• United States
29 Jun 08
Oh, I hope not! I won't be able to get online too much. We use the Internet night and day around here, especially to watch TV shows and Movies online.
• United States
29 Jun 08
I haven't heard about it lately, but I don't know if that's a good thing.
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I read somewhere here on mylot that the big internet ISP were going to "revert" to plans of payment by the minute. Like they used to with dial up - free service and 10 hours a month or you could pay for more hours. Something between Microsoft and whoever it is, to start charging for internet access that is now free, we just pay for the ISP. They want us to pay for the ISP and then will have a minimual package of free minutes and ou buy more as you want or need. I think that sucks and no one is going to like it, but thing is "he who has the gold makes the rules" and since the ISP's don't "own" the internet, those that do will start charging. 4 years from now is the supposed date to start. Like the saying goes, nothing stays good for ever. And they can do it and get their money as this country - this world - is internet dependent. They got us by the throats! THey'd do what they want to pad their pockets and not a single thing we can do about it.! Unless the govt steps in and says it is not allowable or it is TV and newspapers!
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
Consumers can also take their money elsewhere as there are a lot of different companies to chose from. Now, if all of them did that, then there would be some definitely problem
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
16 Jun 08
But if Microsoft buys them all out like they are trying to do with Yahoo - a free internet browser - others will follow and yes, you'll have a choice but if one charges, the others will follow. ANd if you are limited to acceess options....you pay the price. Probably won't happen immediatley as they hope, but I have not doubt that there is a very good chance that it will happen. Those big companies don't give nothing away free unless it is to boost their bottom line in the end. ANd once they have control, therein is the end!
1 person likes this
@saundyl (9783)
• Canada
18 Jun 08
Dial-up through sasktel is setup in a similar manner. I get a set number of hours (theres a variety of bundles to choose from) and if i go over the 180 hours a month they charge 1.50 an hour extra. I only went over once. It works out to be 6 hours/day i can use and who wants to tie up their phone line 24/7.
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jun 08
I wouldn't be too upset about the limit being 180 hours or so, I think I can live with that as I try to turn my computer off when I'm not using it. I can always run my virus scans with the modem turned off.
1 person likes this
@saundyl (9783)
• Canada
19 Jun 08
I'm not upset about it. I work 8 hours a day and have a 2 hour commute...I should sleep at least 8 hours a day...and i do other things as well so that leaves maybe 4 hours to waste online at home during the week. If i'm home sick or snowed in its a bit harder to limit my usage.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
I find this discussion very interesting for I am a Comcast user so I would be one of the customers effected by this going over the time and getting charged extra. I must say this is the first time of me hearing about this and haven't recieved anything in the mail or e-mail containing this. I think in the morning I will give Comcast a call about this and see if it is going to effect me for I don't want to have to pay more than I already am and just might have to limit my time on the computer if this statement is yet true. Thanks for informing us on this.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
You're welcome. I would also like to hear Comcast's response on this as well. It looks like the story is true, I even heard it on the news as I was writing your response. I just don't know any of the details. I may contact AT&T about this, too.
• United States
16 Jun 08
I don't pay as much as you, but I think they charge way too much already. The technology has gotten faster and cheaper on their end.
@krissy32 (205)
• United States
16 Jun 08
If this happens in my area, I will hurl for sure. I leave my computer on for all kinds of reasons: updating programs,installing programs, games and such. If my broadband cable internet company goes to a per minute charging type of scheme, I will protest big time and let everybody know it. This idea stinks like a rotten tomato or worse. It is bad enough that they charge me nearly 60 dollars a month just have service including the 5 dollar a month modem rental. YIkes!!! Attention internet providers: " This per minute scheme is nonsense and you best think again."Disgusting
@mscott (1923)
• United States
21 Jun 08
if it happened people might actually start going outside again. Imagine kids playing in the neighborhood rather than being on the computer. Imagine also how costly this would be for schools and tax-payers. Are they going to make schools exempt? Colleges? Lot of problems with this.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Jun 08
Lol, I think people will find a way around the fees before they go back to the old ways of getting entertainment from other things than a computer. It's entirely possible that they will give corporations and the government certain breaks in the price or those places will look elsewhere for their internet connections.
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
16 Jun 08
I hope this does not come about. I have a cell phone and I keep it off except after six and on the weekends when it is free. Now imagine everyone not using the internet except when it is free and not only that, they will charge the regular internet connection fee. It is just a way to make money. Oh and only the rich people will use the internet. It is getting back to the day when the only way you got a good deal on the internet was if you were in university or owned a big business. You would not want to tell us what companies they are, would you?
• United States
16 Jun 08
The three that I heard on the news as well as in this discussion is Time Warner, Comcast, and AT&T. I'm a AT&T subscriber and I haven't been personally contacted about this. The only way I can see this being a good thing is if they lower the price on some people who don't use the internet that much. My mom, for example, only uses the internet a few hours a week.
• United States
16 Jun 08
I believe people are too used to just popping on and off the internet all day as they like. Watching minutes, doesn't seem likely to work. AOL used to do that back when they started.
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
And AOL stopped this practice, didn't they?
@phoenix25 (1541)
• United States
19 Jun 08
I would say that I'm not surprised that someone has thought of doing that, but I don't think it will go very well for companies that try it. People will get really mad. Internet should be like cable. You pay your cable bill the same amount every month, no matter how many hours of television you watched. Internet should be no different. You should pay for the access, not your amount of activity. I think it would end up averaging out anyway and these companies might even end up shooting themselves in the foot because people would try to limit their internet usage as much as possible to reduce their bill. What are they gonna do next, start charging for cable use by the minute?
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jun 08
You have a good point there. I also get unlimited local calls, too, so I can basically talk on the phone all I want to and they don't charge me extra, either. I don't know why they have to limit anyone in the first place as the technology has gotten better and cheaper. And, like you said, it will all even out, some people use a lot and some, like my mom, use almost none.
@fluffysue (1482)
• United States
16 Jun 08
I had heard that one or two companies were going to test out something like this, I had thought they were either going to charge by the hour, (like in the "old days" lol), or according to bandwidth. But, it's entirely possible that several companies are trying out different sorts of options. I guess it was inevitable, once they saw how much people use the internet, that they would try to figure out the best way to get even more money out of us. They just wanted to wait until we are relying on the internet before they did it. It's too bad, because right now the internet is a very economical source of entertainment. I can surf online, watch all kinds of stuff, chat with friends, etc. without paying for gas or any other costs associated wtih going out. So of course they are going to find a way to make me pay more!
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
I agree with you. If I didn't have to go out and do my photography or go to work, I would be working at home on the internet. It's a real gas and time saver.
• United States
16 Jun 08
I agree desertdarlene! We pay way too much too! Amount that started was only $19.99 per month, turns out to be $47.00 per month now (without taxes etc). The main reason we changed, was to get faster service.... hate the dial up in our area! We also changed our phone service, and the more services you have with a company, you would think the company would want to keep you, instead of upping your fees. Looks like we are searching again! If anyone knows of good deals out there, please let us know. Thanks!
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
I get a discount with AT&T because I bundled my home phone with the internet. That bundle is the reason why I haven't dropped my home phone yet. Well, there are other companies that do both phone and internet that I can switch to.
• India
16 Jun 08
i dont know about this but would like to get more about it
1 person likes this
• United States
16 Jun 08
Yeah, me too. I looked around and haven't seen any companies that are definitely doing this right now, but it has been mentioned on the news several times in my area over the last few days.