9/11 truth

June 20, 2008 6:33pm CST
has anyone been following the 9/11 truth stuff? if you look it up online and do some research, its really scary when you see all of the evidence they have uncovered...they say the building collapsed due to office fires. yet, they keep uncovering molten steel from the "office fires at the trade center"? Office fires only reach 1400 degress, and steel will only melt at degress of 2600 or higher...which helps support the theory that 9/11 may have been an inside job...what do you think?
4 people like this
10 responses
@rpegan (596)
• United States
21 Jun 08
There's a lot more evidence than that pointing to the theory that 9/11 was an inside job. I just got interested in the subject after my brother sent an article to me, and I've put my science credits to good use. There are just so many things that don't quite fit with the "accepted story". It's more than a little frightening when you think about it.
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Jun 08
Okay, I'm game, how did they get the planes to hit the trade center for the cover up story? How did they create a fire hot enough to melt the steel besides through the jetfuel filled planes? And to top it off, how did they perfect this enormous cover up of all those eye witness accounts, home movies, TV crew footage, etc....
3 people like this
21 Jun 08
yes i know there is a lot more evidence...like the theory of the buildings collapsing the way they did...they would have had to be a controlled demolition for a building to collapse straight down...all of the support things have to give way at the same time for it to fall the way it did....
2 people like this
• United States
21 Jun 08
Hey jonsey:). I only know alittle baout this so i cant answer all your questions. BUT i did watch a video of the twin towers and the planes running into them and everything. they play the vid slow . if you look you see bombs being set off from the buttom to the top.. that is JUST BEFORE the plane hit. so the building didnt collapse from just the planes hitting.
1 person likes this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Jun 08
Oh boy.. The planes who hit the trade center were full of jetfuel. The heat of the jet fueled fire was hot enough to start melting the steal bending it out of shape and thereby diminishing the support of the steel skeleton of the building. The building was uniquely built to be held up by that steel skeleton. Who would have thought it would be hit by airplanes filled with jet fuel. If the planes wouldn't have had full tanks, the outcome may not have been so tragic. Now for the inside job theory... were the eye witness accounts, the TV pictures, private pictures, home films etc. of the planes hitting the trade center all some sort of elaborate scheme? Just to kill a couple thousand people? And all of course because we wanted a reason to start a war, right? It would take an enormous amount of effort, bribing, cover up. Just can't be done in the US. This crap is the same as the crap some people spout about the Holocaust never having taken place. Don't believe everything you read online, lol.
3 people like this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Jun 08
I have heard the various theories. They discount the jetfuel theory and how it bent the steel, lol, but they can't come with any real theory of their own on how it may have been done, at least nothing they can really substantiate. They can't even accomplish to proof that the jetfuel version is not working at all. They are grasping for straws. Sometimes they don't even take into account the unique way this building was built in the first place. No other building would have collapsed like this. Some of the architects and engineers use regular steel building schematics. This is not how the towers of the trade center were build. They can't even show how their theories would have been put into place, including the huge media cover up and bribing all those private citizens to have seen planes hitting the building and not have witnessed anything else.... See, you need to do research besides those weird websites. They were created to garner anti-war support. Not all of them are even American. There'll always be people who will believe in some sort of conspiracy theories and government cover-ups. There'll always be people who will tell you certain things didn't happen. They'll even create elaborate evidence to prove they are right. Unfortunately with the Internet, they can reach more people who are easily impressed and will even lend monetary support to the 'cause' You may very well sit there with the tin foil on your head;)
3 people like this
• United States
21 Jun 08
well ther is a vid on youtube and it look like in had missel on the plane "Don't believe everything you read online, lol." but i saw it i did not read it onling lol.
21 Jun 08
have you looked into 9/11 truth? the 400 architects and engineers getting together to look at every point of what happened?
2 people like this
• United States
22 Jun 08
No, I haven't been following it much-but without knowing much about it (actually not knowing anything but what you just mentioned) it's really scary just thinking of the possibility that it was an inside job. But the buildings could have collapsed because of the planes impact, right? What else has been uncovered?
@barehugs (8973)
• Canada
21 Jun 08
Yes Of Course! The planes photographed slicing into the buildings were kit models built for the purpose, and launched from an open window of the Trade Center. The smoke was from smoke bombs thrown from the building tops. Photographers from inside the buildings were hired to take the phony pictures. Yes there can be no doubt it was an inside Job. Even the planes were inside! I wonder who carried the Jet fuel up the stairs? Perhaps some Idiot will figure this one out too!
3 people like this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Jun 08
lol;)
2 people like this
• United States
21 Jun 08
lol i know i look like an inside job
@jason1308 (1586)
• France
21 Jun 08
Now, I will admit from the outset that I haven't done in depth research, but its not difficult to avoid so many conspiracy theories while surfing the net, but in my opinion, this is exactly what they are, theoretical stories, made up by whoever, to create suspicion and harm. The problem with modern technology, it is easy to fabricate evidence and have it look like an official document, Photo editing and video software make it easy to falsify the facts. I know that after this tragic act of terrorism happened, it made things easy for the president to get his war he wanted and stricter controls, but to say that the whole affair was pre-planned, I think is just plain stupid. I am sure that if the government wanted to create a scenerio that created panic like this incident did, they would have made a simpler plan, that would have been easier to implement and control, where nothing would be left to doubt. May I also add that half the problem lies with the Government and the press, which create so much Spin on day to day topics, fill their bulletins with half truths to get a better impact value, and governments never admit when something goes wrong which creates distrust. If the Politicians, came clean and spoke more of the truth, and the press and media focused on the good stories as well as the tragic ones and without all the gossip then the country and the world would be a better place and it would leave no room for the Conspiracy Theories.
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
21 Jun 08
Well said!
2 people like this
• United States
21 Jun 08
any one can photo shop my 5 year sis can do it you can also edit video kodo to you
@zhuxia (344)
• China
21 Jun 08
The accident have passed and who want to reseach the whole plot very cleary is too difficult.Most of the evidence are just guessing or fancy.However,the real truth is so many people are suffered losing families,friends or their own lives. I hate these terrorisms.
• United States
21 Jun 08
you know you are right but if you lost a loved one would you want to know who kill them i mean if the usa gov did this to get oil or what ever would you want to know
@zhuxia (344)
• China
22 Jun 08
I know that,I just mean it's difficult to suvey the accurate evidence.
• United States
21 Jun 08
Omg! my mother keeps up with this stuff.and shes always calling me to watch this or read that.. I will agree. www.shortchange.com or it somthing to that effect. has documentarys, and they do make alot of sense. it will scare the sh~t out of you to even think one of our own coulld have done somthing like this to us. But im not really sure that i beleive in it. i rather just not think about it and just get over what we have went to do in iraq and afgahnastan, get our troops back home. and always remember the fallen and the vicitms of this tragic incident...and go on with life. i dont think wanna handle anymore greif then i have experienced so far with this.
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
21 Jun 08
yes yuNgMaMa I toohave read some of those articles and they' are scary. there is alot of speculation that it may have been an inside job but have no idea how much of all that' is true. I just know it might explain some things that did not make sense. All in all it was one nightmarish tradgedy for sure and we will never forget it either.
@celticeagle (167071)
• Boise, Idaho
21 Jun 08
We may never know for sure. I don't think it was. When there are several fires in one spot it tends to get hotter than it would other wise. If it is proven to be an inside job they will announce it big time.
• United States
21 Jun 08
I've read a fe of the stuff and it seems interesting. I noticed at least three aditional explosions from the tower and occured just before the explotion from the plane reached the lower sections of the tower. I thik perhaps there is a good chance that the explostions came from bombs planted prior to the plane crash. And if there were it only makes sense that there was explosive material in the basement of the towers.