BUSH or BIN LADEN - Who is the bigger TERRORIST ?
By zippyzapper
@zippyzapper (63)
44 responses
@denax1 (708)
• United States
4 Nov 06
Bin Laden is the bigger terrorist. A terrorist is someone who does evil things against innocent people. A terrorist is someone who gets pleasure out of creating terror or making someone terrified. That describes the horrible Bin Laden.
@saphire539 (1639)
• United States
4 Nov 06
bin Laden is the terrorist not Bush.Bush is doing everything he can to help Iraq.Bush is not the one who sent terrorist to blow up places and to kill innocent people who had not done anything to anyone.
@RealIolo (1854)
• United States
6 Nov 06
be sure to be ready to backup your answer with some real world facts zippy. Cite your sources and get real here. I don't know what bias it is that motivates you but I am not convinced that you actually have the average Iraqi citizens best interest in mind.
@zippyzapper (63)
•
4 Nov 06
Yes everything is done to serve the People of Iraq alone and forget about the World's Largest Oilfield which is benefitting whom?????
THE AMERICAN SERVICE DOES NOT COME FOR FREE IN IRAQ!!!
@jonas_71ss (174)
• Virgin Islands (U.S.)
6 Nov 06
Great point! I am certainly not happy that Iraq has been a longer and harder road than we expected, but that is the nature of a war. It takes time, but we will see it through to the end.
1 person likes this
@sabrinam (1203)
• United States
4 Nov 06
I say Bin Laden because Bin Laden refuses to see a differentiation between military and innocent civilians, you don't hear of American troops bombing schools and banks and places where people are going about daily lives, the taliban and it's warriors see no differentiation between military and civilians and thus kill everyone. You can say what you will about Bush but at least he's attempting to liberate an oppressed people. You cannot disagree that Saddam made his country very impoverished while he enjoyed the riches of his land. The Iraquis deserve to have control of their land and government, they know what is best for themselves, they don't need Saddam taking everything away from them and regulating their lives, they can think for themselves.
President Bush is trying to give them the freedom to live without fear of people like Bin Laden.
@beautifulceiling (1300)
• United States
28 Nov 06
You won't read anything like that in the mainstream media because they are nothing more than the mouthpiece of the US government. Dig a little deeper and don't believe blindly accept Fox news spoons into your mouth.
@RebeccaLynn (2256)
• United States
4 Nov 06
Are those the only choices? Too many terrorists in the world!
2 people like this
@megean2k4 (401)
• United States
6 Nov 06
I was going to comment something along the lines of "if you honestly think that, you're the type that is causing America's decline". But, since I checked your site and realized you're not American, I have a different thought. Why do you even care? He's not your president, nor is Bin Laden anything to you. I still think your way off, but entitled to your own opinion. I think all people need to do a serious history check and check the facts, not just what one-sided media has to say. There is so much more to consider than just what meets the eye. This sort of thinking infuriates me. People need to get a serious clue.
1 person likes this
@2bugerboys (752)
• United States
9 Nov 06
Yea, I am tired of all these people saying stuff that have no clue what they are even talking about. I wouldn't say a word about their country in fear of not knowing all the facts.
@jonas_71ss (174)
• Virgin Islands (U.S.)
6 Nov 06
Amen. The blogging world has way to many un-informed, mis-guided bloggers chanting nothing more than meaningless quotes like "Bush is Evil" and "America is the biggest threat to World Peace".
These folks sadly have no facts or clues as to what they are discussing.
2 people like this
@GLOBALSHEEN (1005)
• India
6 Nov 06
In discussions one should not get biased.One should be open minded.We should not try to dump our ill feelings based on our biasing.Lets try to understand the difference between war and terrorism.If Bin Laden was not attacked he would have become a nuisance to the whole world including to his brother muslims.Now he may be living or hiding, at least his power is reduced. Thanks to Americans. That way Bush has done a great service to the whole world and got blamed.
@catwoman1459 (2971)
• United States
4 Nov 06
You go girl! Why dont people get It! thay need to look at the whole picture! What would they do if they got attact? People need to remember what has happened, and why we are doing what we are doing.
@beautifulceiling (1300)
• United States
28 Nov 06
Don't be afraid. It's OK. We have 10,000 nuclear weapons. No one is going to nuke us. Shhh... it's all right, really. Very bad people are stimulating your amygdala because they know that intense fear can cause you to shut down your critical thinking faculties and you will agree to things that make no sense. But no one is going to hurt you.
@RealIolo (1854)
• United States
6 Nov 06
I admit I am not a big fan of Mr. Bush. However...
I want to know why it is that 97% of the Bush bashers in this discussion are from India? What happened to make you hate us now? Or is it really all about religion? And what possessed you zippy? Bin Ladins followers attacked your country too and you think Bush is worse? When is the last time Bush or the Americans attacked your country? You are twisted.
1 person likes this
@manzician (4727)
• India
6 Nov 06
Bin Laden ofcourse... If you talk about bigger....
2 people like this
@zippyzapper (63)
•
4 Nov 06
I think those who blame Bin Laden alone! should check the American war against Russia in Afghanistan and who actually supported Bin Laden to build up his force long time back!
@jonas_71ss (174)
• Virgin Islands (U.S.)
6 Nov 06
For the most part, I think that this discussion is full of anti-Bush rhetoric, with no substantial backing, whether statistical or situational.
It is really easy for someone to say that Bush is to blame, America just wants oil, Bin Laden is not worse than Bush ... Blah Blah Blah. But those who so easily say such mindless things have no real world evidence or even common sense to back up such statements. They are simply spouting useless comments.
I don't believe Bush came into office in 2000 asking for a war against radical islam or Osama Bin Laden, or Iraq for that matter. I'm sure there are those who would say otherwise here as well, but again, there is no meat in the argument.
Let's try to be more intelligent and informed than "Bush is terrorist!".
@sevenseas (754)
• United States
6 Nov 06
Let me put it this way. If they both invited me out to lunch, Bush wouldn't be the one to saw off my head with a dull knife on a video. So, get a grip and grow up.
1 person likes this
@2bugerboys (752)
• United States
9 Nov 06
I don't understand how you can say that Bush is a terrorist, especially compared to Bin Laden. Look at what Bin Laden did!!!
1 person likes this
@RealIolo (1854)
• United States
6 Nov 06
No one can MAKE anyone evil. That is something each individual has to choose for themselves. Don't try to blame Bush here. What he did was set a country free. They can now choose who leads them and what the laws are. I take it you don't think people should get that ability. They need a dictator to do everything for them and steal their stuff so he can live in luxery.
@bogdymanea (78)
• Romania
6 Nov 06
Bush is a stupid president, but definetly bil laden is a terrorist not bush..i hope you die bin laden you idiot person
1 person likes this