At age 100 women will be able to give birth .. scientists claim.!!
@saivenkaat802003 (4823)
India
July 19, 2008 3:32am CST
And this is a possibility within next 30 years.. Really there is a lot of scope and improvement in the area of germ cell technology in which skin cells are used to create sperm and eggs and then combined to make human embryos will soon allow women to start a family at any time in their lives.
Great news.. and this will really bring cheers to the minds of many.
The biologist call this technology as induced pluripotent and still it is to be developed.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1036039/Women-aged-100-able-birth-30-years-scientists-claim.html
I am having a strong opinion once, the thought process has started in the minds of man, surely he has already made one step in the achieving the same.
Cheers
Saivenkat.
3 people like this
16 responses
@positiveminded1977 (7072)
• India
19 Jul 08
Well, how many of them will live to be hundred? Most go off to the next world in their seventies, eighties, or nineties at the most. Then, who would want to have a kid in their hundreds? Not me, at least!
1 person likes this
@saivenkaat802003 (4823)
• India
20 Jul 08
This article, i feel it stress more on infertility, that is haunting many minds who are childless.
It must not be literally transcribed as the woman of 100 years giving birth to a child..
what underlines the news item is, if women of 100 years of age could give birth a child.. then..why not those who are suffering because of infertility in the age groups of 20's and 30's... can have a good cute child..
@stephcjh (38473)
• United States
19 Jul 08
That is something else. I can see a woman giving birth to a child at age 100, but how in the world will she raise the child? She may be unable to play with a child the way most mothers do. she may not be able to do all of the things most mothers take their children to do also. She may not live long enough to see them graduate, get married or have children of their own either. That concerns me.
1 person likes this
@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
19 Jul 08
Hi saivenkat, After reading the article I'm in agreement that it could be possible, but I too would question why anyone would want to give birth at that age. I think that people will be living longer and healthier lives and the day may come when most children will be born to parents forty and over. If it is true that we become wiser with age, it might be better for the children. It is just amazing that so much is happening so fast. If we are going to live longer we had better begin paying attention to the quality of life. Blessings.
1 person likes this
@gemini_rose (16264)
•
19 Jul 08
LOL that would be great ah? Getting to 100 and then being told that I was pregnant, I am pretty sure that it would be the news to finish me off quicker! Just saying that we were all to start living beyond 100 years, who on earth would want to get pregnant, I would just want to sleep all the time at that age!
1 person likes this
@Wolfechu (1193)
• United States
19 Jul 08
Scientists also claimed we'd be living on the moon by the year 2000. Not to mention those flying cars and robot butlers they promised.
And frankly, if you read a prediction in the Mail on Sunday, I'd expect the likelihood to be set back about 20 years just by them mentioning it.
@peavey (16936)
• United States
20 Jul 08
"Great news.. and this will really bring cheers to the minds of many."
Why? First, how many hundred year old women want a baby, as others have said, but secondly, why would anyone else want a hundred year old woman to have a baby? Are we short on babies?
Are the orphanages empty? Is the population of the earth decreasing?
What kind of nonsensical "progress" is this? Why don't scientists work on something that will help us instead??
@saivenkaat802003 (4823)
• India
20 Jul 08
Hi friend thanks for dropping in.. but what i feel is that if the old woman could deliver a child.. why not they use this technology.. to those man and woman who are in their mid 20's and 30's and yet yearning.. and longing for a child...and this is what i mean..Great news.. and this will really bring cheers to the minds of many."
Only those who are childless...will find this news as an interesting development in the field of science.. and this will definitely bring cheers to the many hearts.
@ShepherdSpy (8544)
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
20 Jul 08
Now if they could only do something about that pesky Aging process so your future Centenarian New Mom would be able to look after Her little Bundle of Joy without arthritic hands....Call Me cynical if you will,but if A Healthy Woman of "Traditional" Childbearing age CAN have kids,but chooses not to in that stage of her life,WHY would She want to do it (at greater expense,of course) when that phase of Life is over? DO 50+ Women want new Families? The chances of Genetic abnormality increase with age also,unless the smart people are planning to screen eggs and embryos to PLAN Designer babies before starting a test tube Pregnancy? A little too clinical for Me.
There are over 6 billion People already on this planet.We are already taking action against overpopulation by restricting family size in Places,Contraception in others,We can't control Nature where Drought and Famine decimate populations,so WHY are we looking at extending Fertility? Just because we can do some things,Should We?
@vaishalik (237)
• India
20 Jul 08
Modern science may discover anything but no woman will be willing to give birth at that age. Already only women are suffering from & also tired of monthly four days', nine months' pregancy & giving birth. No woman will be so healthy at that age to give birth & raise the child in good way.
@faith210 (11224)
• Philippines
20 Jul 08
Hi saivenkaat802003! I do agree with your opinion. However, I would not want to give birth at age 100 because that means, I have to work until I am over 100 to support and take care of my child. Goodness, where will I get the energy and stamina to work when at 100, my bones are all surely aching. And who is going to employ a hundred year old woman who has lots of health problems. Yikes! haha..
Take care and God Bless!
@saivenkaat802003 (4823)
• India
20 Jul 08
Sure friend, i underline the principle of development in the field of medicine,as you guessed it right.. and not that i literally decoded the article.. to a woman giving birth to a child.. in 100 years of age..
@wangst (6)
• Singapore
20 Jul 08
At 100 years old most people is already preparing to 'leave the world'. I don't believe anyone at that age would even think of wanting to be pregnant. In fact, could a 100 year old woman able to carry the weight of the baby because her bones are already so brittle, and her womb is already so weak. I honestly think that this is impossible, to say the least.
@guybrush (4658)
• Australia
19 Jul 08
Cheers to the minds of many? Holy moly - the thought of giving birth when I'm 100 leaves me speechless! By the time I was 40 I was well aware I no longer had the concentration to look after a baby or toddler - and by the time I was 50 I was totally over teenagers! I think the way reproduction works at the moment is a very good design and doesn't need tampering with.
1 person likes this
@Debs_place (10520)
• United States
20 Jul 08
But will they want to? ANd won't it be difficult carrying that baby with osteoporosis. Imagine breaking a hip while giving birth. Just because we can do it, it does not mean we should do it.
@sunshinelady (7609)
• United States
20 Jul 08
Why would a women of 100 want to give birth anyway. At that age if she had a child she would have to figure out who is going to take care of the child. That is a little to much for me. I believe in science improving things and ways to make our lives easier but that is not a way to make a womens life easier. To have a child at 100 is just to much.