Why Are Hollywood Stars So Liberal?

@anniepa (27955)
United States
July 19, 2008 4:05am CST
There have been many discussions here, some that I've started or responded to, concerning Hollywood celebrities and their involvement in political causes and campaigns. Many people here and elsewhere seem to be really bothered by stars voicing their opinions on political issues especially when they lean toward the left which admittedly the majority of entertainers probably do. That leads me to this question - why do you suppose so many Hollywood celebrities are liberal Democrats? They're all pretty wealthy which means they'd certainly benefit as much as anyone by tax cuts for the rich. None of them have to worry about not being able to afford health care, gas, or heat for their mansions. Most of them will never be unemployed and even if they were out of work for a time they probably have enough residuals coming in to support their great grandchildren in style. There's no draft so they have no selfish reason to worry about the war. So, why would it be that most of our top actors and actresses not to mention musicians and singers (with the exception of many country stars) are Democrats and many of them have actively campaigned for Democratic candidates, appeared in political ads, made movies promoting their "causes" and even appear on news shows to discuss current events? Please don't just say they're all "stupid and uneducated" because that's no more true of them than it is of the general population. Any thoughts on this? While we're at it, why are so many people against celebrities speaking out about political issues unless they're Republicans? Annie
6 people like this
5 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
19 Jul 08
Well this is a trend that's consistent in many people involved in the arts. I myself was an actor for some time and even amongst poor and struggling actors the majority is clearly democrat. Aside from just the standard trend I'd say that with famous actors it's easy to pay higher taxes. Sure they would benefit from the tax cuts like other rich folk, but they don't work for their money the way someone like Bill Gates does and they don't have real jobs. It's easy for them to live an idealist lifestyle where they can throw away their money since they aren't working day in and day out to earn it. Someone like Bill Gates may feel he's more entitled to keep his money since he's spent his whole life working hard to get where he is. He didn't suddenly make a million dollars out of being the lucky one selected to be in a movie. Just so you know, I have no idea what Bill Gates political affiliation is. I was only using him as an example because he is a well known rich man who worked his way to where he is. He also probably gives away more money to charity than anyone else on the planet so I'm not saying he's the type who hoards his money.
3 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Jul 08
They don't "work for their money"? I'd say they work a heck of a lot harder than some of the corporate CEO's who get paid much more than most movie stars do! Sure, they're doing something they love and the major stars certainly do get paid well but to say they don't "work" for it is a bit of a stretch. Many actors do their own stunts, sometimes if you see a scene with the stars in bathing suits in what we'd think is nice warm water it's actually winter time where they're shooting and they're half frozen. They often work 20 hour days. As for being the "lucky one" selected to be in a movie, I'm sure you've heard the stories of some "overnight sensations" who struggled for years. Annie
3 people like this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
20 Jul 08
It's just barely possible that you could have ever seen me in anything unless you pay close attention to commercials, especially commercials for Universal Studios. I got a fair amount of work voice acting and doing radio commercials, but then my voice sounds like your typical radio voice. My biggest gig was as an extra in the movie Basic starring John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson. I believe I was on the screen for a good 1.5 seconds with a other people dressed as soldiers. I came close to being in a movie called St. Eyria: City of Darkness, but that fell through when the producers lost their investors or some such. As for celebrities... I've met plenty, but I'm certainly not close enough with any that I could actively get you an autograph. Even when I did meet celebrities like Will Smith and Wierd Al Yankovich, I never asked for autographs because that would demote me to fan status when I was trying to make a good impression. The most famous person I've been friends with, if you could call him famous, is my friend Justin, who landed a gig as the WB guy about 6 years ago. He's also the desk clerk in those Amscot commercials they play all the time.
2 people like this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
20 Aug 08
Did Hollywood once have "decent and moral actors and actresses"? Humph! I must have missed that era.
1 person likes this
• United States
19 Jul 08
Only a " stupid and uneducated" Republican would assume that to be a democrat you have to be stupid.I think it is because they are artists first, then rich people. many didn't come from rich families and they had to struggle to make it. and now that they have enough money in the bank and their family will be okay, they are good people who want to give back. And they want the programs that were there to help them to still be there for others. Don't get me wrong , there are many good hearted Republicans out there too but they did it All by themselves and assume that everyone can do what they did. But that's wrong. Also being artist , they are for freedom. Freedom of expression and speech and a woman's right to choose. so of course they would be Democrats.And some were political before they made it and are just being themselves like Susan Sarandon.And just because they have all this money now doesn't mean they will never be poor again.There are many unemployed stars out there.
3 people like this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
21 Jul 08
I think creative types tend to be more empathetic and therefore more liberal. It's not just Hollywood. The majority of writers, artists and musicians are Dems. In fact people who deal in books, antiques and art also tend to be Democrats. Actually, you could probably make a good case for most smart, creative people being liberal Democrats.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Jul 08
Uh-oh...are YOU gonna get it from the right...lol! I agree with you 100%, by the way. Annie
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
22 Aug 08
"Actually, you could probably make a good case for most smart, creative people being liberal Democrats." I would remove the word smart from that. Many of the actors I've worked with were not college educated. I did know some who actually got theater degrees and studied hard, but others spent were more focused on connections than education as connections are what is more likely to get you the job you want. I also have known most antique dealers to be conservatives, not liberals. My father is pretty big in the antique and coin business so I've met many antique dealers. I'm not saying liberals are less intelligent than conservatives. I'm simply pointing out that most people involved in the arts are liberal democrats regardless of their intelligence.
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
20 Jul 08
I really like your discussions Annie because you always make me think. This one I didn't have to think that much to come up with a response. I believe that most celebrities are Democrats or lean that way because they are open minded and carefree. I have not seen one case of an open minded Republican. I am so amazed though when I come into politics how many of the people that respond to your discussions just type like they have no brain. As I read the responses in this discussion I could have gotten a better response out of my dog and no my dog isn't Jake from the Bush's baked beans commericals. Well at least I have never heard him speak English. If only there was an IQ test or something such as that required to be able to post in this interest.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Jul 08
Thank you so much for your kind words, Hon! I try my best and I sure know there are lots more here on myLot that think I'm full of sh1t than agree with me but that's life, and I guess that's what a discussion forum is all about. I love what you said about your dog and I have gotten responses from my male cat, and no, he doesn't speak English but I've learned his dialect of Kittyish(?) well enough to know what he's talking about and he's quite brilliant, much smarter than McCain and I don't have to tell you how much he puts Bush to shame! I agree with what you said about the celebrities, too, and I think you nailed it. I think they are open minded because they're artists and they learn so much from the work they do and the characters they play. Artists are usually quite sensitive also which makes them want to help those who are less fortunate rather than want to put them down. Annie
3 people like this
@ElaanR2 (277)
• United States
21 Aug 08
It's because they have the means to travel and see what is going on in other parts of the world. Their view of life is broadened so they become more sensitized and can not see life merely as right and wrong. There is a part of life that you can never learn in any school. It comes from seeing how more people around the world live and the reasons why they do some of the things they do. When you have had that kind of experience, it becomes difficult for you to be a bigotted conservative. Just go to any campus in the United States and observe how those American students who have spent some time abroad live. Also, if you study the lives of missionaries who have actually ministered to the less fortunate people of this world, you would realize that they are more liberal than those who have spent all their lives living in the comfort and shelter of preaching to people who look just like them. The term liberal has become demonized by the extreme right wing so that it has become synonymous with all that they see as 'evil' in our society. 'Liberalism', however, is the ability to realize that life is larger than your an individual's purview and beliefs. It is the awareness that the sum total of an individual's experiences and environment determine what the individual perceives as right or wrong. It is the realization that an individual must be more careful about questioning another's beliefs and way of life. People in Hollywood also get the opportunity to 'live' other people's lives. In order to be able to play a character well, you must 'become' that character. You have to think like that character. Thus, these actors and actresses learn a lot about different types of people and how and why they live the way they do. In the end, their horizons become so broad that they could only be lying to their own souls if they ever claim that they can only see life as right and wrong.
1 person likes this
@calcynic (433)
• United States
21 Aug 08
Terrific post ElaanR2! I wish I could unjumble my head and come up with something like that. Seems to me that the isolationist tendencies of the "conservative" populace insulates them. They think cosmopolitan means trashy, mod, jetsetting rich dimwits. I think of it as being worldly-wise.
@ElaanR2 (277)
• United States
21 Aug 08
'your an individual's purview and beliefs...' Please consider the 'your' deleted..Sorry for the inconvenience.
1 person likes this