Neclear War

I don't agree that Iran is acting on patterns that it has noticed in the U.S., Iran is intent upon destroying Israel and has stated that many times. Israel is the most dangerous threat to them right now, not the U.S. And, by the way, Iran and the U.S. are talking after all these years. Why? Because Israel has said that they will destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and Iran knows that they can and will so now they're looking to the U.S. for help.

you are right we cant just claim this or that there has to be proof. but whos to stop them if things do get to that point? ever read the left behind series? it kind of mentions something like this and well- all i can say is i am watching.

He asked the people through Congress and Congress approved. Remember Senator Clinton said that her private research proved to her that Iraq had WMDs. President Clinton said they had WMDs and were a danger to the US.

It seems that the problem for Iran is typical of that of many Middle Eastern countries - lots of hot air. The Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is actually from a long line of hot air balloon artist that have made politics in that part of the world so interesting. Will the US attack Iran. Well, on paper no. The US allies in the region are tired of the American idea of "regime change," and with so many problems in Iraq, the treasury and not to mention the Pentagon would probably be against taking on Iran, which is twice the size of Iraq and the people are motivated by religion rather than a fear of a secular dictator. Furthermore, despite his 'anti-Israel' rethoric, the Iranian President is probably smart enough to know that it will take Iran quite sometime to go against Israel, which actually has the nuclear bomb (several in fact - but nobody seems terribly bothered to get them to play by the rules). If anything, Iran will probably keep the status quo and make a few "Anti-US" and "Anti-Israel" statements for domestic consumption. Then again, one should never underestimate the incompetence of the Bush Administration. What better way can there be for a President to rescue his legacy in the dying days of his Administration than by being seen to rescue Israel from it's biggest threat? I'm starting to think though that the world may be better off with an nuclear armed Iran. If the Iranians could fight back, the cowards in the Bush Administration would think twice about invading and suddenly become very eager to negotiate. Just look at North Korea. The Dear Leader does not make speeches about wiping anyone of the face of the planet - he merely tests a nuclear bomb and points them at South Korea and Japan, two countries that invest in and create jobs for the USA rather than demand Aid and loans like a country that the USA feels the need to defend in the Middle East. Needless to say, the Bush Administration is allot less interested in threatening th e Dear Leader of North Korea with the military option and far more interested in paying him off at the negotiating table - the lessons should not be lost of Tehran.

And peace is impossible...We are too conflicting and unfortunately the blood is what our leaders thrive on e.e'' I think no one should be able to own those bombs or manufacture them..but Bush is a tad hypocritical considerin he has 100 stored.