Explosions In Space
@kapilgoela123 (134)
India
November 4, 2006 4:03am CST
Gamma-ray bursts don't loiter, and neither can the people who hunt them. That's why astronomer Andy Fruchter has set his cell phone to ring every time one of these massive explosions - packed with the energy of a trillion suns - occurs in outer space. Since the 1960s, when scientists scanning the sky for elicit nuclear tests first witnessed these powerful explosions and misconstrued them for Russian bombs, the origin of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) has been a mystery. But Fruchter's recent attention to cosmic detail has filled in one of the gaps: he and his team have identified the types of galaxies where these bursts occur in a study published in Nature on May 10. AGRB, best-described as a flash of very high-energy radiation, can betriggered by the collapse of a massive star. It is always accompaniedby a supernova - another type of explosion resulting from the death ofa star - and a GRB will be followed by a supernova instants later in apowerful succession of blows. However, although one might expect thetwo events to form in similar environments, images from the HubbleTelescope collected by Fruchter and other astronomers from the SpaceTelescope Science Institute in Baltimore show that they don't. In fact,the presence of a supernova doesn't always indicate that a GRB hasoccurred. Credit: NASA and A. Feild (STScI) A model of a long-duration GRB. This is where it gets tricky. Although a GRB is a lot brighter than a supernova, and is observed first, it is actually produced by the supernova, which is typically of much higher energy. Sometimes the collapse of a star will only result in a supernova: for a GRB to occur as well requires the right conditions. Fruchter observed long-duration GRBs (those lasting more than 2 seconds) and noticed that if a supernova occurred in a massive - and older - galaxy, this supernova would not have an associated GRB. He attributes this to the high metallicity characteristic of older galaxies, where metal ions have had years to accumulate, and suggests that GRBs can only be produced by supernovae in galaxies with low metal levels.Metallicityinhibits GRBS in two ways. First, metal ions in the atmosphere absorbemissions, or the gas jets, constituting a GRB, and this smothers theburst. Second, the magnetic field generated by the metal ions opposesand slows the rapid spin needed to generate a GRB. Some supernovaewould like to produce GRBs, explains Fruchter, but they can't. Luckily,these are the supernovae seen in massive, metal-rich, evolved galaxies,like ours. If a GRB were to occur in our Milky Way galaxy, it coulddestroy the ozone, start fires on Earth, cause mutations and even massextinctions. So Fruchter says that one of the results of this study is:Relax! It is very unlikely that our galaxy will host such anexplosion and the closest star where one could occur is about 150,000light years away.This reassuring conclusion has been reached after painstakingly capturing images of GRBs with the Hubble Telescope for the past 10 years.There are well over 3000 gamma- ray bursts known, Fruchter explains, but only 40 or so for which we have a good image. But the next time an image is captured, the astronomers won't be so much wondering if it's close to home. Instead, they will be using it to study star formation in the early universe. Since GRBs are very bright, they are visible in areas where stars have formed, whereas these areas ally not observable using telescopes available today.
No responses