Has the NRA gone CRAZY?

United States
July 31, 2008 6:57am CST
Yes, it is true. The NRA has a new campaign to expose Obama's plan to destroy the 2d admendment. The problem is, I have not seen anywhere that Obama has such a plan. Did the NRA just make this up? Here are the details of Obama's 10 point plan to undermine the 2d admendment. The 10 points are listed in the graphic, not the text. http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?id=308&issue=047 I say the NRA needs to put up or shut up as to its sources for these being Obama's positions. If Obama really does have this 10 point plan as an agenda, he will be defeated by a large margin. What do you say?
2 people like this
4 responses
laglen
@laglen (19759)
• United States
31 Jul 08
Here is a link that might help. I know it doesn't have all of the facts you are looking for, I will research more later, gotta get to work! http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm
2 people like this
clrumfelt
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
23 Sep 08
I have seen videos online from speeches Obama has given indicating to me that from the list these items are supported by him: 3,4,5,6,8,9 I haven't seen anything on the other four items, but just the six listed are enough for me to feel he is intent on messing with our 2nd ammendment rights.
1 person likes this
gewcew23
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
31 Jul 08
Well I am sorry but I cannot help you on this issue for believe it or not I am not a member of the NRA, I know that is shocking. I am a member of Second Amendment Sisters. If the NRA can prove what they have wrote then fine but this just looks like they are preaching to the choir, instead of tring to educate people on the reason why we need to protect the Second Amendment.
1 person likes this
liscampll
@liscampll (124)
• United States
23 Sep 08
www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/nra_targets_obama.html
1 person likes this
redyellowblackdog
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
24 Sep 08
I read the link you provided. It is not very comforting to me. Obama's denials are not convincing in that they are slick in avoiding exact samely worded denials of the NRA's claims in a purely legalistic sense. Remember that Obama is a lawyer. He is lying about the NRA's claims with very clever language so it looks like he is not. I wish this was not so, but it is. That said, the NRA is probably right in their conclusions but they can only be infered from Obama's words, not conclusively proved. Hence, what the NRA presents as conclusions are only likelyhoods, not facts or conclusions.
1 person likes this