New Refferal system????? What u guys think??

well brother if it comes to this then no team will score more than 250 or may be 200 i guess,,see todays paly about the contraversal out descision of our wall RAHUL DRAVID,,now wat resulted in the controversy,,it was the same reffrel system,,i think this is unffair,,let player have their luck atleast wth them in case not their form,,,,,well typically about india,,all will be judged lbw may be b4 30 over in the one day match sometimes,,wat do u think

I do not agree with you. We cannot completly depend on technology. If that is a case then I feel using bowling machines is wise as well and its not far if batting machines are also used. Instead of exiciting game we will be left to see a video game. What do you say?

Ram, I agree to some extent with new referal system. But presence of ground umpires is a must one for the game. See human error is common, save some bad by steve bucknor. Just because one sardarji has killed indira gandi not all the sardarji's are bad. Even one sardar has given fine reply to lankeys by taking six wickets. Third referal may get you an accruacy of 99 per cent. Even then 1 per cent mistake is possible in that. It's a sports and the players needs to have sportsmandhsip. V need to obey the decisions of the ground umpire. He sees everything at the first sight. If we tend to eliminate the ground umpires, then cricket can also be played through computers, why at the ground. v should not resort to too much of referal system as it will spoil the morale of the game.

I am not against this new referral system neither I am with it. I think Cricket should use the combination of both Human and Technology. The new system does good to remove the doubt of players on umpire's decision. But if we completely depend on technology there will be waste of time and resources. Even the technology isn't fool proof, I mean hawk eye system can't accurately show where the ball is going to hit.

I too believe this is a good system... But i dont agree with throwin the ground umpire out of the game...the human aspect must be still there for in the game...

Technology has its limit. Even with all the replays, hawk eye,snichometers, infra red sensors and other gizmos available we still can't be sure of some of the close decisions regarding nicks and close to ground catches. We have to understand that technology doesn't have an eye and brain like a human does. A human can apply his brain and analyze if a sound coming is of the bat or pad but its difficult for a machine to do that ( at least now) and relying upon a snichometer to tell us if there was a nick will be stupid. Yes it can assist the umpire but can never replace an umpire. With the new review system the players have the right to challenge the decisions made by the ground umpire and take assistance of technology to get the right decisions. I believe there will be fewer mistakes now regarding caught behind decisions and LBW decisions. Though I must say it has added another dimension to the tactical side of a captain. When to use a review becomes an important decision to be made by the captain. I support the use of technology in sports but machines replacing humans is not the need of the hour at least till the technology develops enough to have the same sensibility as humans.

well i feel that there are good and bad to every thing which is new has a good side and a bad side and that is the case with the new referral system. i thin that it is good for the game to be played in right manner. specially after what happened to us in Australia. but then the bad thing is that it is decreasing the quality of umpires. plus there are others like it slows down the game a lot and that is one big problem. but the most important i feel is the LBW decision. i think it is better than you cannot challenge the LBW decision unless and until there are doubts about a nick or ball landing outside the leg stump. those things are ok, but a camera can never tell you the real thing about the line of the ball if it had not hit the pads which the virtual eye shows. it is just and aid. it is never 100 percent right and so we should not reply on it.

i m totally against the referrel system.there r many reasons for it........ first is hawkeye is not on proper position to judge the direction of ball....its at very height on ground ...........for proper judging of ball it should be on head of umpire.....(lol)