Quality Versus Quantity

Tweet

I strongly recommend quality over quantity every time. It is not only efficient to appreciate quality work but it is also resourceful to benefit from such a resource. This is the very reason, I refuse to post and start a new discussion if I don't have anything significant to contribute or share. However, sometimes I do feel that I can reply to a certain discussion with a few less words than is required. Can you not be comprehensive and yet concise in writing your feedback over here at myLot? I mean don't get me wrong, I love myLot, it has given me the opportunity to make new friends that share the same passions, opinions and dreams as myself and I say it is one of the best way to grow your social network and links all over the world without boundaries. But the limit of four sentences at least to make your point look "descriptive" over here is somewhat ironic. I think quality should always be preferred. If a certain response can be efficiently and concisely be written in a sentence or two, then why not do such an act? Why stretch it more to meet the requirements mentioned in guidelines. Maybe I am mistaken, but would any experienced fellow myLotter like to shed some light regarding this issue? Thank you in advance.