Is the Constituation a "living document?"

@clrumfelt (5490)
United States
August 13, 2008 9:29am CST
There are those who fully claim right to the constutional rights guaranteed the citizens of the USA in the Bill of Rights. I am one of those who does, maintianing those rights are mine and I don't want anyone messing with them. There are also those who claim the Constitution is a "living document" that should be changed and re-interpreted from time to time. I say they are stripping away our rights when they change or re-interpret the Constitution. The Illinios Conservative Beacon features an article by Jerry McDanies that addresses this issure. What is your opinion of changing the Bill of Rights? http://illinoisconservative.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/obamas-global-poverty-program/
2 people like this
7 responses
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
14 Aug 08
I believe the Constitution should never be changed. If you look at what they did in Canada with our Human Rights document, you can see that changing or interpreting it to suit certain others is wrong. The United States did a good draft when it made up the Constitution. As it stands, it allows for no errors or no wrong interpretation and it should never be altered. If it is, it will turn up like a mess like up here in Canada.
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
14 Aug 08
Thanks for your comments. I believe the founding fathers of America were wise men who had a thirst for liberty and passed on those benefits to their posterity, as the preamble states as its objective. When modern politicians don't respect the noble beginnings of our nation, it destroys what we believe in and what we stand for. Hopefully the people will wake up and there will be an outcry to prevent the changes some politicians are trying to make.
1 person likes this
@peavey (16936)
• United States
14 Aug 08
If they change the Constitution, they change what the United States stands for... or stood for. The document has stood the test of time. The only reason anyone wants to change it is to undercut our freedoms and our way of life.
2 people like this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
14 Aug 08
I agree completely. Our freedoms are eroded when the constitution is changed in response to the whims of our politicians. Once gone, we can never get them back.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
17 Aug 08
I agree with you and Mr Jerry McDanies, the Constitution fine the way it is. The Constitution has away to change the words in the Constitution legally. The founding father allowed the Constitution to be changed or more properly amended. There is not one clause in the Constitution that give judges the right to just on their opinion change the wording in the Constitution. Judges have no right to use their position to create new laws. Article 2 of the Constitution clearly say that role is for Congress.
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
18 Aug 08
We must also be careful not to let Congress craftily word the ammendments to give judges wide latitude of interpretation which will allow them to deny people of their rights "legally." It's impertative we pay attention to what is going on and protect our rights in Congress and the courts.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Aug 08
The US Constitution does not give us our rights, in fact it doesn't address itself to us at all. What it is is a document from We the People addressed to the Federal Government. It doesn't give us freedom, but it tells the governent what authority We the People will allow of it. In other words, it doesn't limit you or I at all... unless we are performing duties in the government. The US Constitution was set up to be ammendable when We the People, the Federal Government and the States decide it is needed. There are no parts of the constitution that can't be ammended. However, ammending the US Constitution is a very difficult thing to do, and should be. Changes to the Constitution are to be made according to the limitations set by the Constitution. Congress, The President, The Supreme Court (or any other court) have no authority to re-interpret or change it to fit their agenda. We the People don't have the authority to change it just because it doesn't fit our agenda. So, yes, it is a living document and subject to change, but it isn't as changeable as many would like it to be.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Aug 08
Absolutly! Both the Dredd Scott Decision and Roe Vs. Wade were examples of courts trying to put into the US Constitution what was never there.
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
29 Aug 08
Yours is a great analysis of the relationship between citizens of the USA and their Constitution. I feel it is a travesty when judges in US courts choose to reinterpret the Constitution to fit their agenda. It may not give us our rights but We the People can be affected in adverse ways because of the power our courts are given to interpret the Constitution and affect our daily lives with it.
• United States
13 Aug 08
I believe that the constitution should stay the same. It was made for a reason and we have kept it the same for all this time for a reason. Because it works..If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Obama is wanting to get rid of the 2nd amendment. I think that is total BS. It is there to protect us, not to harm us and if it isn't there, then it will harm us. But that is only my opinion.
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
13 Aug 08
I agree with you, jeanie, the BS is getting pretty deep these days. Obama wants to change a lot more about the Constitution than the 2nd Ammendment. Jerry McDaniel had a bit to say in his blog about some of Obama's and other leftist politicians'disregard for our rights. http://illinoisconservative.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/obamas-global-poverty-program/
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
13 Aug 08
Sorry, I didn't realize I was posting the link twice.
@ThisBeIt (22)
• United States
16 Aug 08
The Bill of Rights must remain the same. Those rights are what protect us from the government. It's what stops them from breaking into your house and putting you in jail for the rest of your life. It's what stops them from imprisoning me because my views are different. Without the Bill of Rights, this country is no longer safe. If you change it now, it'll be easier to change the next time, and the next, until it's too late. The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing. The Bill of Rights must not change.
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
18 Aug 08
I agree completely. When politicians start messing with our Bill of Rights there should be a public outry made. I think that is the only way to stop such meddling because politician have been trying to change it for years. Hopefully they won't somehow slip the changes by us without us knowing what they're up to.
@dogsnme (1264)
• United States
16 Aug 08
There has never been a another governing document created in the history of the world like the Constitution of the United States of America. And it should never be changed. There are those in politics, in both parties, but mostly the Democrats, who seek to change the Constitution, and destroy the rights we have fought so hard to keep and to make this country more of a Socialist society. This country and its government were formed on the basis that, we, the people of America, rule the land through the government representatives and officials we elect. Many people are being misled by the liberal-minded celebrities, college professors, and left-leaning news media, because they don't know the truth about the founding of America, and it's up to people like you and me to defend the truth. Vladimir Lenin said, "A lie told often enough becomes the truth." Well, I believe that the truth told often enough can erase a lie. It's up to the people who know the truth to erase the lies that have been told and believed for so long. God bless the USA!
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
16 Aug 08
You're right on, dogsnme!