10 reasons for accepting Obamanation?

A woman has the right to choose. If we didn't have that right or any of our other rights than we might as well be called the United States of China. And, if McCain is elected we might as well be called the United States of Congo (the poorest country in the world).

I do not want America to be run by a man who would allow babies who survived an abortion to be thrown in a room with trash so that they would die. I mean there are couples who would dearly love and care for these infants. Why do not the nurses when they see the infant survive, call the adoption agency or have a list of couples who want children? I do not know about the links, but this is just my opinion. A child hater like Obama should not be in the White House.

I don't think anything found on a site that describes itself as being a "last chance ministry" and containing "endtime prophecys" "given" to an apparent Prophet that claims right on it's front page that attending "Sunday Churches" will make you recieve the mark of the beast , is likely to be the most reliable information to base your political opinion on. also Free Republic is hardly an unbiased source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic

Hello Bongkarpasang, Abortion is the single most divisive issue we face in the USA. It has been for for going on forty years. The volume of the debate took a drastic shift upward last year when our Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling limiting late-term, trimester abortions. Yet, that is not what we're talking about here. Senator Obama's votes and public statements prior to and after those votes have nothing to do with a woman's right to choose. Once the fetus is delivered alive and severed from the umbilical cord, there can be no question that he or she is a living, breathing Human Being -- deserving of no less of the Human Rights protections as any other living, breathing Human Being! I have very carefully read the documented committee and floor vote statements by Sen. Obama, as part of his 2001, 2002, and 2003 efforts to deny life-saving medical care to live birth, botched abortion babies. Sen. Obama voted and is quoted as far more extreme than the lobby groups, Planned Parenthood or NARAL (the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League). Neither P.P. nor NARAL supported the denial of life-saving medical care to the infants in question. Below is the Jill Stanek text and link where Stanek comprehensively links to the Illinois Legislative record as it relates to the 2001, 2002, and 2003 efforts in this regard. http://www.jillstanek.com... [i]"The cornerstone bill was the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which defined legal personhood. This definition was identical to the federal BAIPA which was drafted from the definition of "live birth" created by the World Health Organization in 1950 and adopted by the United Nations in 1955.... Here I will only post links to Obama's actions and votes on the cornerstone bill, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. The bill number changed every year it was reintroduced. 2001 Senate Bill 1095, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Go here to view Obama's "no" vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 28, 2001. Transcript of Obama's verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001, pages 84-90 Obama's "present" vote on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001 2002 Senate Bill 1662, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Go here to view Obama's "no" vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 6, 2002. (ABC inadvertently coped bill #1663, a companion bill. The vote for the Born Alive bill, #1662, was identical.) Transcript of Obama's verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002, pages 28-35 Obama's "no" vote on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002 2003 Senate Bill 1082, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Democrats took control of the IL Senate with the 2002 elections. They sent Born Alive to the infamously liberal Health & Human Services Committee, chaired by Barack Obama. As can be seen on the Actions docket, Obama held Born Alive on March 6, 2003, from even being voted on in committee. It is also important to note from the docket that on March 13, 2003, Obama stopped the senate sponsor from adding the lately discussed clarification paragraph from the federal BAIPA, to make the bills absolutely identical." [/i] Sen. Obama's exact words were: "Viability is the line that has been drawn by the Supreme Court to determine whether or not an abortion can or cannot take place. And, if we're placing a burden on the doctor that says that you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible, and give them as much medical attention as -- as is necessary to try to keep the child alive, then we're probably crossing the lines in terms of unconstitutionality."