which entertains you more.. T20 or 50 over match..?

T20 is here to stay even if some of the fans like me don't really like that. It is providing more excitement than 50 over format. But the real class of bowling is missing in these matches

Hello,Madan! ..The shorter version of the Odi is gradually gaining popularity and one day it will replace the 50 over match and test match.And it will be incorporated in the Olympic.However most audience would prefer the 50 over match.similarly the players aso prefer to play the 50 over match.

T20 attracts me more due to it's less time and entertainment strategy..every one is fired up..and moreover, best players r playing the T20 match...

yes of course the T20 match has caught on the fans frenzy... it is of course fast and very interesting to watch...and entire match comepletes in 3 hours... as a result nowadays i dont like watching ODIs at all...i cannot spend entire day to see the result of a slow and boring match... i think the ICC is making a big mistake of not popularizing T20s much...

Obviously the T-20 format is more entertaining and less time consuming. In today's world nobody has the time to sit on the couch for 6 hours, and that time is literally wasted if India loses. So definately the T-20 format is greatly entertaining as the match is over in a jiffy and the players are more aggressive with their shots, the type of game everyone wants to see. This is the reason why the IPL league was a big hit, I hope it comes again soon. Still many people prefer the 50 over format as they think that playing real cricket is all about endurance and not aggressiveness. Also the bowlers get very bad figures in a T-20 match, so most bowlers prefer the 50 over format. But as of me, the T-20 rocks. Happy myLotting.

While many prefer the fastest fully slam bang form of T-20 internationals, I prefer ODIs which have a varying pace and allows at least something for the bowlers as well.