Is Barak Obama pro-choice enough?
By thinkfuture
@thinkfuture (191)
United States
August 29, 2008 11:14pm CST
I don't know about you, but I am ready for the next step in Pro-choice leaders of our country! I am prochoice, but most people do not understand what it means to be truly prochoice. I am prochoice for absolute rights of parents and guardians in deciding to euthanize their elderly relatives or their children, if either interfere with their life. We need to be able to make choices about our lives even after a "baby" is born, why should our rights be revoked because they are breathing? Why should someone have to pay for their mistake of deciding to keep their baby? I agree with Obama that we should be able to change our minds! I think Obama will help us achieve this goal, but he hasn't taken the next evolutionary step in thinking after infanticide. I say, survival of the fittest! What use do they have for society if they are unwanted leeches on our time and finances? We need a change in America, which is why I am so excited and honored to go door to door to speak to others in my community in support of Barak Obama for President!
Obama Biden 2008!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbZJYWjkAPo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2elXcVySElc
http://www.barakobama.com
3 responses
@thinkfuture (191)
• United States
30 Aug 08
Look, what is so good about about punishing someone for making the mistake of having their child instead of an abortion; something they realize too late to change in current society. I, for one, am encouraged by Obama's progressive views that will make this a possibility when he is president! We need the freedom to make our own choices.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY&feature=related
Look at this clip: all those conservatives are regressive. We need to move forward as Obama suggests, to allow euthanizing unwanted babies. We need to take the next step in evolution. Real human value and rights are only found in productive members of society, and I think most Americans see that, and are voting for Obama! Obama 2008!
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
30 Aug 08
So you don't believe it's life when the child is inside the woman's body, that's your opinion. Obama however supports the murder of infants OUTSIDE the woman's body if the child is viable after an abortion. I don't know how anyone can condone that without acknowledging it as murder.
@zydecokitten (451)
• United States
30 Aug 08
thinkfuture - there is nothing "good" about it. You can't even discuss this under the terms of Pro-choice. You are talking about a living person and murder. If you have the word "think" in your name, maybe you should start "thinkING". Believe me, Obama respects LIFE. People who are Pro-choice respect life, they just don't think that women's bodies should be governed by a government of men. What they do with their bodies is up to them, their families, their physicians and their higher power (God).
You are talking nonsense.
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
30 Aug 08
A question for you. You decide that your parents are becoming a burden because they are retired and have all this wealth and are not spending it in a way that you think is right. You decide to have them euthanize them. They also have decided that you are not as productive or successful as they wanted so they decide to have you euthanized. Who wins?
You talk about your rights, what about the other persons rights?
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
30 Aug 08
ROFLMAO!!!
You can't really be as "out there" as you seem unless you're off your meds.
For instance, those who are pulling welfare should probably be kindly euthanized because they are not benefiting society at all.
Ok, you've really established that you're full of s%*t. No one is that stupid so thanks for the laughs.
You can't really be as "out there" as you seem unless you're off your meds.
For instance, those who are pulling welfare should probably be kindly euthanized because they are not benefiting society at all.
Ok, you've really established that you're full of s%*t. No one is that stupid so thanks for the laughs.@thinkfuture (191)
• United States
3 Sep 08
What makes you think I'm the one "out there"? Aren't the majority usually ignorant? Whatever benefits the people is what is best for the people. If those pulling welfare, and in nursing homes are euthanized, President Obama will have enough additional revenue from the decrease in welfare and medicare and medicaid to pay for the additional programs that will benefit the majority of hardworking Americans that have utility! To advance the human race, we must streamline our productivity and resources, only the strongest should survive and thrive, then move on for the following generations. It is about the race, not the individual. Unless you don't believe in progressive evolution? Vote Obama 2008!
@thinkfuture (191)
• United States
30 Aug 08
The rights of the most successful and productive person within the society should have the choice. For instance, those who are pulling welfare should probably be kindly euthanized because they are not benefiting society at all. This would give us the free funds to support beneficial social programs like Obama's health care program, etc. We would not be in a deficit very long after that. We must do all we can to support the productive members of society, and eliminate the leeches of society. This is the change we need in our country, wouldn't you agree? Many don't realize that this is the direction we will head after our Marxist revolution. Euthanizing unwanted babies and children, as Obama and I support, is just the beginning. Let us take our next evolutionary step and admit that overpopulation and waste are two problems easily solved! Make sure you vote Obama in November!
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
30 Aug 08
Hmmm, and what is he going to do with the ones who are already on the bench? Will he euthanize them because they're old? LOL!
@thinkfuture (191)
• United States
3 Sep 08
That is a good idea - perhaps, if it benefits the people.
