Palin has no balls!

United States
September 4, 2008 2:30am CST
The speech tonight is evidence that she doesn't have the guts to go for the kill, she just dances around the issues like everyone else!
1 person likes this
7 responses
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
4 Sep 08
And some just sit around all day scratching theirs.
3 people like this
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
5 Sep 08
Men do not sit around all day scratching their balls. Sometimes they pick their nose too
1 person likes this
• United States
5 Sep 08
That was a very sexist comment. Are you inferring that men just sit around all day doing that? That is so nasty! How dare you make men out to be lazy ! Vote Obama 2008!
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
4 Sep 08
I wouldn't expect someone that sexy to have balls. Usually you can tell if they have balls because their jaws are usually muscular and more square. But these days you never know with all of the plastic surgery and such going on. What a sexy president she would make.
@clrumfelt (5490)
• United States
4 Sep 08
Typical, cheuvanistic male, neanderthal logic. Not thinking with your head, are you? Sarah Palin is a tough and capable politician who has taken on corrupt politicians in her city and state and cleaned a lot of it up. I think she can take on the likes of Obama any time and come out ahead. If men can't see past her legs it is probably because they are jealous she can field dress a moose and they can't.
1 person likes this
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
5 Sep 08
What is your problem? Just because you are an old bag doesn't mean that you have to be so uptight. Maybe that is why you are an old bag.
• United States
5 Sep 08
I can promise you ladies this: Biden will make her cry and weep on national television before the campaign is over! She is weak! Vote Obama 2008!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
4 Sep 08
This from an anti freedom Marxist. All you support is Obama and his friend who wishes he killed more cops and US soldiers. Have you killed any yourself?
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
5 Sep 08
No, I was in the US Army and the National Guards of 3 states, I wasn't in any civilian militias. You can take that for whatever you decide it's worth. Obama's mentors are bigoted preachers who teach hatred for White people and an unrepentent traitor who would put a bullet in my head and brag about it. Obama supports killing babies who are living outside the womb. Most of the policies in Ob "blueprint for change" doesn't come into effect for 10 years. That way he can claim that he's doing something but never has to take resonsibility for the results (or actually doing anything). Almost all of his policies include massive spending increases, but the only way he plans on paying for them is increasing taxes on "the rich". But he also says he supports "pay as you go" policies for the government. He can't even keep up with the rhetoric in his own plan. This is the person you look up to?
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
4 Sep 08
You really need to start adding a sarcasm tag. People are going to think you're serious... Oh wait, you're right this time, she doesn't have balls. On an unrelated note one of the contestants on America's Next Top Model does!
1 person likes this
• United States
5 Sep 08
LOL. Whatever you say, Taskr!
• United States
4 Sep 08
I am glad she doesnt, it means she wont be wasting time scratching them and instead will be making decisions that will help take us further!!
2 people like this
• United States
5 Sep 08
Another sexist remark! What do you have against men? My point is that to be a good leader, you have to be able to fight, and be tough against enemies, and she in particular did not show that! Vote Obama 2008!
@fwidman (11514)
• United States
5 Sep 08
Of course she has no balls, she's (a) female and (b) a politician. No balls in either of those categories
1 person likes this
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
4 Sep 08
Most of us women have found that they're not necessary - they don't do most men much good - why would we need them? We've been doing very well for centuries without them! It's a little early in the election to "go in for the kill" and would have been an inappropriate move for the convention.