Is van nistelrooy's absence helping man utd?
By rajanmr7
@rajanmr7 (411)
India
7 responses
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
20 Nov 06
Never heard of this person, but I am sure it is due to I am in the USA, so I am not sure.
@Lackingstyle (7509)
•
8 Nov 06
It has to boost backroom morale, doesn't it?
Though Fergie made a move that proved to come good by the recent fantastic form of Saha, though I don't think you could say the absence of a player who was hardly playing would alone boost the results which have been very good so far. (apart from Southend ;) )
@Lackingstyle (7509)
•
17 Nov 06
How has it?
He was out of favour and hardly played so Manchester United had that flexability beforehand there was no certain place for Ruud, the only advantage is that a 50k+ wage packet isn't being dished out.
1 person likes this
@globalwealth (213)
• Singapore
17 Nov 06
No doubt, Van is a very good striker.
However, this goes to show how good Sir Alex is, where he is able to change their playing pattern around without his top striker.
1 person likes this
@baronarthur (4187)
• Indonesia
21 Nov 06
I think if Ruud still in MU, it would be better.
But, there must be no fight between Fergie and him.
Nice to see MU now...
