Pictures....
By ProudMommy22
@ProudMommy22 (705)
United States
September 16, 2008 11:25am CST
When your kids was babys did you ever have your there pictures taken every month? I did and still do have there pictures done every month...Both of my kids has been having there pictures done since they was 5 days old. I spend about $200-$300 each month on pictures. Not sure exactly why but i do for some reason. I like taking pictures and having there pictures done. Are you the same way or no?
2 people like this
5 responses
@ravinskye (8237)
• United States
16 Sep 08
I had their pictures taken at 3 months, 6 months and then at 1 year old. and then every year after that. my oldest started school so now it will just be the yearly school pictures for her. and then i'll get all 3 of them done together every year. i couldn't imagine spending that much on pictures.
2 people like this
@ProudMommy22 (705)
• United States
17 Sep 08
Oh yeahIts a good bit of money to put out but i save money from the time i get them done to the next time i get them done so i spend a good bit on pictures but in the end its all worth it.
2 people like this
@gemini_rose (16264)
•
21 Sep 08
Yes as babies I was always getting pictures of them, but I did not have them done professionally I would do them myself. I would line them up the way I wanted them to be and I would take a few shots of them. I still take pics but not as many but I am due to get some more done soon.
1 person likes this
@ProudMommy22 (705)
• United States
22 Sep 08
Thats Cool....I never really thought about doing it like that myself i dunno i guess jsut never came across to do so.
1 person likes this
@lovemygirls2503 (431)
• United States
3 Oct 08
No I didn't have my daughters pictures taken every month. I had my oldest daughters taken when she was born and for like her birthday, christmas, and easter. For my second one i had her hospital pics taken and then the christmas after she was born I gotta digital camera much and going and have them take and you can capture the most favorite poses you want.
@ProudMommy22 (705)
• United States
7 Oct 08
I can agree with that. I also went out and bought a digital camera when my frist son was born so that i could take pictures whenever i wanted to too. It is money saving way to go however i dunno i jsut like having there pictures done. I dont do my frist son's pictures every month anymore he's 2 but i do have my Youngest son's pictures done every month hes 9 months old. I'll have his pictures done every month until he's 1 and then the next set will be when hes 2 years old as well and of course i do the christmas pictures and stuff of that nature like holiday pictures done but other than that i cant do it every month anymore.
@scorpio19 (1363)
•
16 Sep 08
I did when they were babies but I'm lucky if I can get one of my son now, he's 14 and won't let me take one of him..so make the most of it and treasure you photos while they still let you have them done lol
@ProudMommy22 (705)
• United States
17 Sep 08
I know thats right. My son hes 2 years old almost 3 and he loves it and will try to pose for you when you say can i take a picture lol hes so funny when it does it though its so cute.
2 people like this
@lkoenig07 (289)
• United States
20 Sep 08
I personally find it pointless to go and get my kids pictures taken (professionally) often. We've gotten them done when they were 2 months (which was my mother's day gift) and when they were 6 months. We don't plan on getting them done again until they are 1 year old. I just think it's kind of dumb because your kids don't change that much every month.
1 person likes this
@ProudMommy22 (705)
• United States
21 Sep 08
I can understand that.....However we like to get them done every month just because i guess you could say. And it takes a good bit of money to get them done every month but its still enjoyable to us. Everyone has there opinion. I dont think its dumb but yeah thats jsut my opinion.
1 person likes this
