bradman or sachin is the best player

oh fathima, every one knows abt bradman who played for country & everyone knows that sachin only plays for personal earnings,not for our country.Now this game is cosidered as business where individual get more & more.

both of them were equally best player/batsman of their periods sir bradman's average of 99.94 is still the best or record till date and it is extremely difficult or impossible to break that record also today most of the records holded by sachin were holded by sir bradman so i dont find any comparision between them they both are best

i havnt seen bradman playing, but what i have listned about bradman,,i think he was better than sachin. average of 99.9 is not a joke.

noone had mentioned here about the ground size during Bradman days. the ground is such big and it is really hard to beat 4's and sixes. but bradman smashed many many 6's in his life during hs all plays. the size of the ground is smaller compared to olden days. i am not meaning here sachin is not a great player. but atleast 10% bradman is better than sachin. if we compare sehwag and sachin, i can say sehwag is bold than sachin. because sachin always struggles when he stands in 90's. i really hate this. but once, total india depended on sachin. i like to remember that point as well.

Well i have never seen bradman play so i would go with sachin

wel....the first thing which we need to think is wether we can compare cricket of those days..and now-a-days...we cant compare bradman n sachin....they have their own unique style...and there are many best players all over world..so lets stick to sachin as for now...but we cant forget LARA...MCGRATH..SHANE WARNE...at the same time

I havent seen Bradman play, but have seen Sachin. Till 1998 I felt he was the best. Then there on the downfall started. I dont agree that he plays for his personal earnings. but yes time has come so that he hangs his boots. I wish he does it in style, like he battered the Aussies in 1998.