ICL vs IPL

we may ban IPL,,because ICL was started before it,, and it was the original idea..

Hi, I believe both are good oppurtunities for young budding crickters. BCCI and ICC is wrong by temring ICL players as rebel cricketers. I think if a ICL player does well then he is a candidate for the national side. People should look at talent and not other things. Toomuch money involved is getting into cricket and its bound to makes some controversies. Cheers, Tutul

i think ICL is big money.. And BCCI knows that.. that is why its trying to label them as rebel league.. and also ICL is a threat to the monopoly of BCCI in indian cricket... i'm really to hear that sri lankan cricket board has lifted the ban on its icl players... and also there is news that icc is considering the option of giving icl an official icc recognition... now that would be some great news... once it gets icc recognition then it can compete better with bcci and then may be bcci people will finally step down and accept icl as a part of indian cricket's development

I think both icl and ipl are good . BCCI and ICC not approved to icl . but icl provide opportunity for young player . In Ipl many world class player play and young player learn from senior . IPl is started against icl by bcci .