If you can exchange your life with an animal/plants, what would it be?
By hanasadako
@hanasadako (92)
Philippines
September 27, 2008 3:24am CST
And why?...
Me? I want to become a cat. Not just an ordinary cat, but a cat owned by a queen, wahahahaha!
2 responses
@aryajayaprakash (1643)
• Japan
27 Sep 08
I would like to be a lion. Good that still we will be in the same family of animals. Lions and cats belong to one family if I am not wrong. But I have a doubt, can we use mylot or they have to change the program a little bit in order to make it user friendly for animals?But I am not sure whether cats and lions will be allowed to enter into a common discussion forum!
@sutanhartanto (4122)
• Indonesia
27 Sep 08
you mean, queen latifah? 
well, i won't take the opportunity. i am very contented to be a man. i think human is the most developed living creatures on this earth. human also has limited authority and free will whom animal and other living creatures don't have. that's why human can be very useful for the humanity and universality, but they can be harmful either. so, we can decide whether we will be good or mean, we will do virtues or 'commit sins'.
in the other party, animal doesn't have such an authority and free will. they just move according their instinct, guided by the mother nature herself. that's why there is no mean of cruel animal and good animal. if a tiger catches and eats a deer, we cannot say that the tiger is mean or "committing sin". the deer is his food, so how can he be called mean to eat his lunch?
well, i won't take the opportunity. i am very contented to be a man. i think human is the most developed living creatures on this earth. human also has limited authority and free will whom animal and other living creatures don't have. that's why human can be very useful for the humanity and universality, but they can be harmful either. so, we can decide whether we will be good or mean, we will do virtues or 'commit sins'.
in the other party, animal doesn't have such an authority and free will. they just move according their instinct, guided by the mother nature herself. that's why there is no mean of cruel animal and good animal. if a tiger catches and eats a deer, we cannot say that the tiger is mean or "committing sin". the deer is his food, so how can he be called mean to eat his lunch? 