Is Christ Our Example?

@taurus54 (317)
Philippines
September 29, 2008 5:50pm CST
MILLIONS assert that the philosophy of Christ is perfect -- that he was the wisest that ever uttered speech. Let us see: Resist not evil. If smitten on one cheek turn the other. Is there any philosophy, any wisdom in this? Christ takes from goodness, from virtue, from the truth, the right of self-defence. Vice becomes the master of the world, and the good become the victims of the infamous. No man has the right to protect himself, his property, his wife and children. Government becomes impossible, and the world is at the mercy of criminals. Is there any absurdity beyond this? Love your enemies. Is this possible? Did any human being ever love his enemies? Did Christ love his,when he denounced them as whited sepulchers,hypocrites and vipers? We cannot love those who hate us.Hatred in the hearts of others does not breed love in ours. Not to resist evil is absurd; to love your enemies is impossible. Take no thought for the morrow. The idea was that God would take care of us as he did of sparrows and lilies. Is there the least sense in that belief? Does God take care of anybody? Can we live without taking thought for the morrow? To plow, to sow, to cultivate, to harvest, is to take thought for the morrow. We plan and work for the future, for our children, for the unborn generations to come. Without this forethought there could be no progress, no civilization. The world would go back to the caves and dens of savagery.
3 responses
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
30 Sep 08
Or it could just be if people would have actually followed this bit of example we might all have a peaceful and prosperous world instead of spending money we don't have on bombs that cost millions to kill some faceless so called enemy. While the education of children falls from current standards every year and the homeless die in streets and the people starve. Ask any psychologist and they will tell you that the same traits in anyone who is known as a hero is also the same you will find in people who were known as villains. The world is still full of selfishness and greed he was trying to balance the equation a balanced person is what we all should be. Hate is no different than violence you spread it and you will get it back the same, love even if returned with hate will eventually shame the other person. Also I would like to point out that the sermon on the mount was for those 120 that were the hard core followers of Jesus. If they slacked in their example what would that have said to everyone?
• United States
30 Sep 08
If you have your mind on the world than no you will never be able to accomplish this. Their minds were on something greater.
1 person likes this
@xtedaxcvg (3189)
• Philippines
30 Sep 08
"Resist not evil. If smitten on one cheek turn the other. " In my opinion, this simply means forgive the person that struck you. Turning the other cheek is an exaggeration so as to convince the listener that striking back is by far the last thing you'd do to your offender. Everyone has a conscience and you'd be an animal if you don't have one. Everyone has the right to change and no one can take that away from anybody. Turning the other cheek is like restraining yourself from striking back. Look at the bigger picture, don't let the spur of the moment take hold of you. "Love your enemies." The people who convicted Christ.. the ones who betrayed Him.. the ones who crucified Him.. who laughed at Him and mocked Him.. based on our standards those are His enemies. But what did He do when He was about to die? He asked The Lord to forgive them.. forgive them for they do not know what they are doing.. and He still loved them. "Take no thought for the morrow. " Don't you see the wisdom in this? Maybe because you've looked at it on a negative angle. Also, you have omitted several parts on that passage: "Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof." (Matt. 6:24-34 ) Now, try to read that passage and reflect on it. I did, and I want to thank you for raising that question. It made my faith stronger. :) God Bless you!
@taurus54 (317)
• Philippines
30 Sep 08
"If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out.If thy right hand offend thee, cut it off." Why? Because it is better that one of our members should perish than that the whole body should be cast into hell. Is there any wisdom in putting out your eyes or cutting off your hands? Is it possible to extract from these extravagant sayings the smallest grain of common sense? "Swear not at all; neither by Heaven,for it is God's throne; nor by the Earth, for it is his footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is his holy city." Here we find the astronomy and geology of Christ.Heaven is the throne of God, the monarch;the earth is his footstool. A footstool that turns over at the rate of a thousand miles an hour, and sweeps through space at the rate of over a thousand miles a minute! Where did Christ think heaven was?Why was Jerusalem a holy city? Was it because the inhabitants were ignorant, cruel and superstitious? "If any man will sue thee at the law and take away thy coat let him have thy cloak also." Is there any philosophy, any good sense,in that commandment? Would it not be just as sensible to say: "If a man obtains a judgment against you for one hundred dollars, give him two hundred." Only the insane could give or follow this advice.
@taurus54 (317)
• Philippines
30 Sep 08
"Think not I am come to send peace on earth. I came not to send peace, but a sword.For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the against his father, and the daughter against her mother." If this is true, how much better it would have been had he remained away. Is it possible that he who said,"Resist not evil," came to bring a sword?That he who said, "Love your enemies,"came to destroy the peace of the world? To set father against son, and daughter against father -- what a glorious mission! He did bring a sword, and the sword was wet for a thousand years with innocent blood.In millions of hearts he sowed the seeds of hatred and revenge. He divided nations and families, put out the light of reason, and petrified the hearts of men. "And every one that hath forsaken house,or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life." According to the writer of Matthew,Christ, the compassionate, the merciful, uttered these terrible words. Is it possible that Christ offered the bribe of eternal joy to those who would desert their fathers,their mothers, their wives and children? Are we to win the happiness of heaven by deserting the ones we love? Is a home to be ruined here for the sake of a mansion there? And yet it is said that Christ is an example for all the world. Did he desert his father and mother? He said, speaking to his mother:"Woman, what have I to do with thee?"
@taurus54 (317)
• Philippines
30 Sep 08
The Pharisees said unto Christ:"Is it lawful to pay tribute unto Caesar? Christ said: "Show me the tribute money ."They brought him a penny. And he saith unto them: "Whose is the image and the superscription? "They said: "Caesar's."And Christ said: "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's." Did Christ think that the money belonged to Caesar because his image and superscription were stamped upon it? Did the penny belong to Caesar or to the man who had earned it? Had Caesar the right to demand it because it was adorned with his image? Does it appear from this conversation that Christ understood the real nature and use of money? Can we now say that Christ was the greatest of philosophers?
• United States
30 Sep 08
I think there is good and bad in all of us. We all have it, thinking it is still having it, it's how you act that changes the outcome. I believe g-d takes care of us in giving us that to believe in. Something to hold on to when times are tough. I think some people just take it to the extreme.