No Media Liberal Bias? Are You Blind or just Illiterate?

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 1, 2008 8:57pm CST
How can anyone claim no liberal bias in the incompetent press when none other than Gwen Ifill is going to "moderate" Thursday's VP debate. "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama" at book by Gwen Ifill just published a book fawning all over Obama and other Black Democrats. So, not only does she get to skew the debates her way, she gets to plug her new book too. No liberal bias? What a lie!
2 people like this
9 responses
@cynddvs (2948)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I do wish they had picked a better person to moderate this debate. To me this is a very important debate. I'm predicting that with the way Palin has handled her interviews lately she will either completely screw the debate up or she will come out smelling like a rose. If she screws the debate up I don't want anyone to be able to blame it on a biased moderator. But of course if she does really well with the debate she will come out looking even better since the debate is being moderated by a liberal democrat. Guess we'll just have to see how it goes. And I agree with what the first person says. Couldn't the McCain campaign said "Nope. Find someone else to moderate."?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 08
McCain is too interested in playing his "reach across the aisle" games to complain. In fact, he has come out supporting her as the "moderator".
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 08
Obama is good at answering questions, but the again the incompetent press refuses to ask him anything important. The incompetent press allows Obama to say anything he wants and lets it go unchallenged. Obama is a criminal who helped run the criminal organization ACORN. Yes, most of the slip ups and gaffes are trivial, and while I resent Obama for not even remembering Sgt. Jopek's name, it isn't something I'd base a voting decision on. The fact that Obama supports voter fraud and knowingly covers for it isn't trivial and the press is negligent for not reporting this fact.
@cynddvs (2948)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Oh please. The mistakes Palin is making in her interviews aren't about soldiers names. They are mistakes about not knowing the information she needs to know in order to be a vice president. Palin hasn't made just one slip up in one interview. She has messed them up repeatedly. I'm not saying I think she's stupid. I just don't think she has what it takes to be vice president. Let alone president if something happens to McCain.
1 person likes this
@jerzgirl (9291)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Her book ISN'T published. She hasn't finished writing it and she hasn't even started the chapter on Obama. Who are the other moderators with her? Besides, someone has to be chosen and everyone has a personal perspective. If they'd chosen a diehard Republican, would you have complained of bias? Unless they opted for a third party moderator, there will always be someone who can find fault.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 08
True, I stand corrected. She will be the only "moderator". Yes, if a diehard Republican was to moderate any presidential or vp debate, I would complain. I also complain that 3rd party candidates aren't included in these "presidential" debates.
1 person likes this
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Jerzgirl,The title of the book pretty well states that the entire book is about Obama, not just one chapter!
@jerzgirl (9291)
• United States
2 Oct 08
The author herself says she has not yet written the chapter on Obama. The title says politics during the TIME of Obama, not the politics OF Obama. There IS a difference in meaning in that, even if you choose not to see it.
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
3 Oct 08
If she was republican it would never fly!! That's for sure!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Oct 08
For sure! I will say though, I thought she did a pretty good job.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I'm really not that familiar with Gwen Ifil but I do know her book was announced back in July and written about in Time Magazine some time ago. The book was announced at least two weeks before both sides agreed with her being the moderator. I agree, she doesn't seem like the ideal choice but I really don't think the right has a legitimate argument since this isn't anything knew and they didn't protest when she was announced as the moderator. For what it's worth, I have heard commentators from both parties say she's an objective journalist. As I said, I'm not very familiar with her so I can't say if I agree or disagree with them. Annie
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 08
That's why I'm not saying she should be told she can't do it. But if it were a "moderator" who wrote a book about Palin or McCain, well, we just know it would never happen. McCain woudn't challenge this. He rarely challenges the left in anything, which is one of the reasons he isn't a very good Republican nominee.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Obviously most people have a political affiliation right or left, but to have a moderator that will directly, financially, benefit from the victory of one candidate over the other is just ridiculous. They shouldn't have to challenge her status as moderator. She should recuse herself just for the appearance of impropriety. I guess fairness would just be too much to ask.
1 person likes this
@mcat19 (1357)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Both candidates approved of the moderator and the format of the debates. If you are so upset about Gwen Ifill, just blame her for whatever the results of the debate are. That would be typical.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Oct 08
Yes, both sides did agree to the format and moderator. McCain rarely stands up to liberals, which is why so many Republicans don't support him. The thing is, if the press were even remotely ethical, they would challenge her as a moderator. If Gwen Ifill had an ounce of integrity, she wouldn't have accepted the job. But I understand why you would defend them.
• United States
4 Oct 08
Now that the debate is over I must say, she did an outstanding job. Not like she had much choice. Her gig was up by the time the cameras rolled. I heard a guy callin on the radio with a good analogy. He said if you compared it to a football game. You are always going to have referees who have a favorite team, That is unavoidable. But with her book, It was like Gwen Ifill Had Money on the Game. But she did do a great job.
• United States
2 Oct 08
Liberal Bias?? In the media?? Really?? AT NPR??? Where the 'N' stands for Liberal. We can only hope that McCain's people will let Sarah Be Sarah and not try to form her into the middling weeniee that McCain is. She should talk about liberal bias and Ifill's book every chance she gets. We can only hope that Ifill will Be so over the top Biased that even the "Blinded By The Light" Obamabots can't even deny it.
@Zephier (73)
• United States
2 Oct 08
Liberal bias upsets a lot of people just because of the fact that too many people try to act like it doesn't exist because they are liberals. I think this may be a good thing, to an extent, since it shows McCain and Palin have a lot of confidence in the fact that she'll perform well in the debates. It'll be the best thing seeing Joe Biden getting owned by a woman all Democrats have so little respect for.