Obama does not even qualify to be his own body guard

"What is it with these people that can't understand that the congress runs the country, they make and pass the laws." Why the big fuss over the Presidency, then? This is just a point of convenience--since Democrats have the majority in Congress, suddenly Congress "runs the country", because then you can blame Congress and act like it's all the Democrats' fault the stock market is at its lowest point in five years, as well as whatever other negative stuff you can think of. Please, spare me. "he won't even vote to make English our Offical Language" Let me know when you can spell "official" (and also when to use a question mark (psst, first sentence)). Then I might care what you have to say about the English language. "What language would he like us to speak, Muslim maybe." Muslim is not a language, you imbecile. Do you speak Christian? Also, there should be a question mark at the end of a question. "I have ask on here many times someone show me what this man has that makes him qualified to run our country. And I can not get one person to tell ONE thing he has done or one qualification that he has." He graduated with highest honors at Harvard Law, and became president of the Harvard Law Review. At the same time as the above, he was a civil rights attorney and a community organizer. Then he taught CONSTITUTIONAL LAW for 12 years (with all the disrespect for the Constitution we've had in the last eight years, it's important we have a President who knows the Constitution and is willing to defend it). Then he spent three terms in the Illinois Senate. Then he was elected to the U.S. Senate with 70% of the vote, and has since worked with both parties to pass landmark legislation on ethics reform, nuclear non-proliferation, and transparency in government spending (usaspending.gov, a website where you can see how your tax money is spent by the government, exists because of him). He demonstrated his superior judgment in being on the 'right side' of Iraq from the very beginning, at a time when it was extremely politically unpopular to oppose the Iraq invasion. Today, the majority of Americans believe we should have never invaded in the first place. Then he ran for President, doing in the primaries what no Republican has EVER done--beat a Clinton. Call me crazy, but I think he can handle it. Now I'd better not catch you claiming no one can answer that question in the future, because I just did. "Who will you blame then." Another missing question mark. You really ought to master English one of these days. "IF BARACK OBAMA would apply for a job with the FBI, or with the SECRET SERVICE, he would be disqualified because of his past association with Bill Ayers, a known terrorist." Sarah Palin herself referenced a New York Times article that showed that Ayers and Obama were never close, never friends. On the other hand, G. Gordon Liddy, a man who literally has publicly given instructions on how to best kill government agents, refers to John McCain as an "old friend". Smells like projection to me. "Now this is one great man to be running our country." That's why even in conservative-leaning poll aggregators, he's projected to get over 270 EVs even WITHOUT counting toss-up states. :) (Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/) See you in November, hotshot.

I posted this below but, incase you missed it, you need to get your facts straight about the *National* Language amendment that had a shelf life of approximately half an hour. http://www.snopes.com/pol... This was part of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. Look halfway down the page, read the wording of Amendment 4064, which would make English the*National* language, declaring that the federal government had no obligation to provide documents or services in any language other than English. English only forms, information, ballots...how very democratic of us considering the size of our Spanish speaking population. Half an hour later Amendment 4073 was passed which declared English to be the common and unifying language of the United States, which contridicted the previous bill. With upwards of 18% of the population of this country speaking a language other than English at home, it's ridiculous for anyone to support a prejudicial bill that would place official limits on communication. That is, unless some folks have a problem with the idea of the free flow of information in a free country.