Three year old faces permanent Simpson's tattoo! He's THREE for goodness sake!

@James72 (26790)
Australia
October 12, 2008 3:13am CST
I just read the following article and found it quite disturbing in many ways. http://motherandbaby.com.au/wondertime/ContentItem.aspx?contentID=946 I do realize that it has been a negative reaction to the henna used and you can;t possibly predict that something like this may happen; but the little boy is three years old! The question I guess is would you allow your three year old child to get even a fake henna tattoo or do you consider this to be too young an age to be encouraging things like this? This kid may end up with Bart Simpson on his arm for his entire life! Personally I feel that a 3 year old should not be encouraged or allowed to have even a fake tattoo. What do you think?
7 people like this
17 responses
12 Oct 08
I must admit when we are on holiday i dont let my children have the fake tattoo's, i know that if the ink is black then it is not natural henna, how do we know what chemicals they have mixed with it to give it its black colouring so i would never risk it! i allow my boys to have the natural henna which is a brown colour, they have had this done at school fayres and things, that poor lad is going to be scarred for life! I definitely thing 3 is a young age to be having that on their skin!!!! hugs Jessica
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
It's good to get a Mother's perspective here and I am glad that you agree that the age of 3 is a tad too young for something like this! I personally don't have major concerns for the fake stick on tattoo's for kids over a certain age as it's really not much different to face painting or something and comes off easily. But henna like the one used in this case?? This stuff stains the skin and a three year old's skin is so sensitive. Thanks for your comments jessica.
1 person likes this
12 Oct 08
exactly, you wouldnt willingly put bleach onto your childs skin so why put a chemical colouring agent on them!!! i know if id allowed my son to have that done and his skin reacted that way i would feel so guilty, we are supposed to know better, and our children put their trust in us to make sure the are kept safe and although this doesnt happen all the time, just the risk of it happening to your child should deter you from doing it, by all means do it to yourself but not risk your child!!! Hugs jessica
1 person likes this
12 Oct 08
Oh my word, iv just shown my son the picture on the link....his response.....that looks cool i want that!!!! Not the reaction i was looking for!!!! hugs Jessica
1 person likes this
@alokn99 (5717)
• India
12 Oct 08
Three year olds and tatoo, even fake ones. I am against them totally James. I have never like the ideas of tatoos in any case, so may seem totally biased against them. And on kids, given the chance, i do express my displeasure in any way that i can. The example that you have cited above indicates exactly one of the reasons why i have been against them. I do wish some of the new parents of today would exercise more caution and concern in this regard.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I am not someone who a problem with even permanent tattoo's at all if they are on an adult but I can appreciate how many people don't see the point in them or like them too. I know the stick on ones very well as they are popular with kids in my country. They place them in bags of candy and gum for example and you put them on the skin like a sticker of sorts. This type of thing I don't really have any issue with at all because you just rub them off! But henna stains the skin and lasts for some time. I just find it odd that someone would allow a person to paint henna on their three year old child?? I realize that this is an isolated case but also could not agree with you more that parents need to exercise far more caution at times. Thanks for the comments alok. (I was going to suggest to you that we both get myLot tattooed on our butts but at least I now know not to ask!)
1 person likes this
@alokn99 (5717)
• India
12 Oct 08
Oh, you can ask James, anytime, as long as it one of those removable sticker types. BTW. what do you have in mind to flaunt it ? Or were you thinking about only having a rear view in the mirror and a good laugh to follow ?
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I was thinking we could hang out in the back of one of those tourist buses with the big rear windows! It could be the ultimate display of multiculturalism!
@munhozmib (3836)
• Sao Paulo, Brazil
14 Oct 08
Hello, James! Wow, that's horrible. A three year old getting a tattoo already? I would not allow my children to make something like that. Not at that age, at least. The kid doesn't even know what he wants yet, he is so young! I could see that the intention was not to make a permanent tattoo, but now he is going to have a heck of a scar in his arm... A Bart Simpson scar. And when he gets to school, everybody will be looking into his arm and commenting about it, which will not be too healthy for him. Poor mother, though, because she didn't know it would turn into this. But she shouldn't have allowed a tattoo on her three year old son's arm. Respectfully, Munhozmib.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
14 Oct 08
Hi munhozmib! Yep, three years old! Sure it's a paint on henna tattoo but look at what happened! Three years old is WAY too young for something like this and the Mother should have known better and at least have done her homework first. This kid will probably be pretty popular at first but once the novelty wears off it won't be fun for him at all. Thank you for your comments.
@sid556 (30959)
• United States
13 Oct 08
The temporary tattoos have been around since I was a kid and I'm 52. I remember my brothers using them really really young. 3 seems young but now a days, kids are in pre-school at age 3 and seem so much older than back in my day. Infants get ear piercings now which is something that never happened when I was a kid. Of course there is always going to be that rare occassion where a kid will react to something like this but it is rare.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
I agree that this is a very rare circumstance sid but 3 is definitely way too young to even be considering something like this. The temporary tattoo's were common when I was a child too and we used to get them in small packs of bubble gum! Thanks for responding.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30959)
• United States
14 Oct 08
I am so out of the loop of this stuff as all my kids are older...I didn't realize that they were even making tatoos this realistic for kids. Yes, 3 is too young, I agree.
1 person likes this
@Munchkin547 (2778)
13 Oct 08
I suppose it's down to the individual parent - i don't have children myself so i don't feel i can really judge other people as i'm sure i would be a useless mum if i had kids right now! But i do think that three is probably a little bit young to be having fake tattoos put on, i don't think tattoos are something that most parents would want to encourage - i know my parents went nuts when i got mine- and i'm twenty years older than this one!! hehe It's sad though that he has had this reaction and there wasn't any way the parents could really have known, but children's skin can be very sensitive! xxxx
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
Yes I do agree that it is up to each individual parent to make personal choices for their children, but they should also take the time to fully understand the pros and cons of their decisions when it comes to something like the henna tattoo for this child. Children's skin IS very sensitive; and the parents MAY have had a chance of knowing if they hadn't of been so ingorant in the first place. It's a tough way to learn a lesson that's for sure! Thanks for responding and I am sure that when the time comes for you to have your own kids, you will do just fine!
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
Exactly right Munckin. What could this 3 year old have possibly understood about any of this? All he wanted was a Bart Simpson! And wise move to take your time on starting a family too. It's a serious responsibility and a decision tthat should never be taken lightly.
13 Oct 08
You;re right people shouldn't act unless they are fully aware of the potential consequences of their actions, and this is a pretty tough way to learn the lesson, especially for the child who probably had very little say in the matter anyway! I hope I'll be a good mum when the time comes but i'm in no rush, too much of the big wide world to go see first before i get myself tied down for 18 years or so!! hehe xxx
1 person likes this
@Rustinas1 (438)
• United States
14 Oct 08
Why would any intelligent parent encourage their child to have a tattoo, whether it's fake or real? I feel for the child and parents, for I'm sure they didn't expect this to happen, shoud be against the law to do this to children of this age. Stick the with wet, press, and peel that wash off and usually with no problems. I've seen and read something similar to this and it was in Take 5.
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
14 Oct 08
From my perspective, water based one's are perfectly fine. But I could not agree with you more when it comes to henna ones. The Mother should have at least sought a base understanding of the possible implications before caving in to her child's demands. If she had done this and stood her ground then this may not have happened at all. I also agree that there should be a minimum age law for something like this. Thanks for the response Rustinas.
@ronaldinu (12422)
• Malta
12 Oct 08
It's not the first time that I read about henna temporary tattoos that leave a permanent scar on the body. I do believe that children should not do a tattoo even if it is a fake one. It is the parents responsability not to allow their children do such a thing.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I personally have no issues with kids having the water applied temporary tattoo's just for fun once in a while but I am talking about them doing this over a certain age. Henna though is a far more concerning situation, especially when you consider some of the points made in the replies provided by other members. How can a 3 year old possibly understand anything about a tattoo anyway? Let alone a henna one that has now scarred them! I agree that it was this little boy's parents responsibility to NOT allow this to happen. Thanks for your comments ronaldinu.
@di1159 (1580)
• United States
13 Oct 08
There is a place in a mall I shop that has a small henna tattoo shop. I've let my kids try it, (they are 13 and 15). I think 3 is way too young, not because I have anything against tattoos, but just the fact that I remember my kids both had very delicate skin and were subject to allergic reactions when I switched soaps, detergents, etc, besides that it is too pricey for a 3 year old. I would stick to the peel ones, and see how his skin reacted. I can imagine the nightmare this has caused his mother. Shame on the place that allowed it too.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
Having a 13 and 15 year old teenager do something like this is perfectly understandable di and I am glad to hear that you think 3 is way too young also. Most parent's are already so concerned with things like shampoos' etc for their young children so who in their right mind would then go and whack henna on an infant? And yes, the place that allowed it should have some serious explaining to do. Thanks for the response.
@magojordan (3252)
• Philippines
13 Oct 08
That's really very bad. I hope that before anyone decides to get even a fake tattoo like henna ones, they should see first if they are allergic to it. Also for me honestly getting a fake henna tattoo for a three year old is not a good idea since there are reported allergies to this kind of tattoo. Maybe it would have been better if it was just painted like those for face painting for kids if the boy really wants a Bart Simpson on his arm. Anyway I do hope that parents should consider things first before putting anything on their children, not only fake tattoos but also other products.
1 person likes this
• United States
12 Oct 08
I am really old school when it come to these kinds of things. i would not encourage such a young person to put anything on their body like that. He probably will regret it. I feel bad for the youngster. I hope that other parents learn that things can go wrong and do not let there children do this!
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
New avatar Louise! Very nice! I am not old school as such myself but common sense prevails! This little boy was only 3 years old and his Mother obviously didn't do her homework about henna. I feel bad for this little guy too and I hope that people will read some of the earlier comments about henna and the different types etc so they can avoid the same situation. Thanks for responding.
@lanlan011 (701)
• United States
13 Oct 08
My mom would barely allowed me to get the stick on tattoos. She believed they would encourage me to get a real one. I once had one spray painted on me at the skating rink. But by the time I was done skating and dancing my sweat erased the "tattoo" so my mom never saw it. I think you should never do anything to a child's skin. You never know how their skin might react. I know it was a harmless act but she shouldnt have done that to him at a young age. Henna tattoos usually come out and they do it to kids in other countries, but its sad that the boy is stuck with this.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
Personally I have no issues with stick-on tattoo;s on kids but I of course respect any parent that is against all types. It's their children so they have every right to make decisions regarding them! It IS sad that this porr little boy is stuck with this and hopefully in time it will actually fade. A child's skin is so sensitive and especially a 3 year old's so this Mother should have known better. Thanks for responding lanlan.
• United States
12 Oct 08
Oh man. I guess it looks like it may be permanent. I know the mom must feel really guilty and bad. I know that she didn't mean any harm by it, but she shouldn't have let her son get the tattoo. They have the little fake tattos that you can apply and can easily wash off, she should've just let him use those kind instead. I wouldn't have let him get a henna tattoo if it was me.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
The picture in the article does look pretty nasty. It actually resembles the skim after a REAL tattoo! I agree that she should have stuck with the water applied stick-on tattoo's also. There is no harm in these at all and they can be removed very simply. She could have even let him change them around with new ones each day! Henna on a 3 year old is just irresponsible behaviour by both the Mother AND the guy who applied it in the first place. Thanks for your response mrsgoodygoody.
• United States
12 Oct 08
I would be very angry. I would have to decide what to do next. I think the man doing the henna tattoo needs to have people sign an informed consent and give them the possible risks. I think like vaccines- parents need to know the possible side affects. Now when parents read the consent and risk form they need to know the risk is small, but real!!If I had been told it was possible for a side affect of this nature, I would never have allowed it.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
I would be angry too deees. At myself as a parent and especially at the man who applied the henna tattoo with the chemicals mixed in. It all comes down to knowledge as well. If this Mother had of known more about henna she probably never would have allowed it to happen in the first place. A consent form is a good idea too but of course all the seller of the services would care about is getting people in and out so he can make money so he probably wouldn;t take this seriously either. Thanks for responding.
@sati123 (184)
13 Oct 08
that was shocking! i think 3 year old is too young for henna, i am in my twenties but i am still afraid to try henna, i am afraid that my skin will react to the ink,
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
13 Oct 08
It certainly was sati! I have no issues with henna myself but 3 is WAY too young. Thanks for responding.
@tryxiness (4544)
• Philippines
12 Oct 08
I guess, not with henna, but you know there's this fancy tattoo where kids would just apply water on it and it kind of sticks on the skin and these kind of tattoes are believed to be child friendly. Well, if the kid wants to have such, I guess, I will inform the kid with the consequences so that he/she will have an informed decision to make.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I do realize this is a freak occurence but a stick on tattoo is far less of a concern than a henna one. As you can see from the article the Mother is obviously distressed over the incident but it still concerns me that this boy may have a permanent reminder of this incident his whole life. Maybe I am over-reacting because you just never know that things like this may happen and why would you think it would? But still, I personally wouldn't allow someone to paint henna on a three year old! Thanks for responding tryxiness.
1 person likes this
@Amberina (1541)
• United States
12 Oct 08
My daughter was doing Henna tattoos and everywhere she read on the internet or the book she had on it they had warnings of using black henna saying it could leave scars and that some black henna ingredients could contain black hair dye. After reading about it she always used brown henna or she made her own she got a recipe on the internet. She warned her friends about getting one from someone who uses black henna. The guy giving the tattoos should have done some more reading up on using the black kind.
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I didn't know this at all Amberina! As far as I knew henna was henna! lol. This is exactly why the Mother of this 3 year old boy should have been more cautious then. And yes, the guy giving the henna tattoo's should have been more responsible also. Thanks for responding and for sharing this information.
• Bahrain
12 Oct 08
Henna "tattoos" are very safe and fade within a week or two, depends on how often you wash/scrub the part where you had it, the more the faster. I've personally used them quite often and never had such a thing happening to me, but that's what you get for relying on the words of a street inkist and not know the difference between different henna ink types. If anyone's interested, the most reliable color is a dark greenish henna, it can go away the quickest, has less smell "strength" if I should say so, and it never hurts or does any allergy reactions on the skin, afterall, it is made from a plant. The red one is kindof the same, but I don't have much experience with it so can't tell... On the other hand, the black one is very dangerous; it is the strongest and lasts the longest, but that is only because the ink is "enhanced" with either chemicals or -if you believe it or not- oil. It's not possible to hide or alter the color of the henna ink so as long as you know how each is you'll be safe. I used the black one once, thank goodness nothing happened w
1 person likes this
@James72 (26790)
• Australia
12 Oct 08
I agree that generally speaking, henna tattoo's are safe and have even had them myself. This street inkist was more than likely playing around with the formula to make it last longer or appear darker and look at the result! This poor little boy may now be scarred with this tattoo for life. Thanks for responding Tenma and for sharing the information about the different types and which are the safest. Hopefully people reading this will now be able to ask questions if they ever have the chance to get a henna tattoo and can avoid any possible problems.