The Big Question No Politician Dares To Answer

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
October 14, 2008 10:50am CST
The burning questions regarding the recently passed bailout, and the one that almost no one has bothered to answer, is how the government intends to pay for it. Governments have three main methods by which they can raise funds: taxation, printing new money, and debt. As our $10 trillion national debt shows, the federal government has always enjoyed raising money by issuing new debt. Money is gained upfront, while the cost of repaying that debt is pushed onto future generations. This method is especially favored today, since imposing $700 billion worth of taxes would lead to widespread public dissatisfaction. When the cost of all the recent bailouts plus the cost of all the new lending facilities the Federal Reserve has initiated are added together, we quickly reach a figure in the trillions of dollars. Even with the debt ceiling being raised to $11.3 trillion, the issuance of debt alone cannot begin to cover the cost of all the bailouts in which the government is engaged. Every indication is that the government will use both debt and inflation in its attempt to keep the economy running at full speed. Debt financing has begun in earnest, as the national debt has increased $600 billion over the past three weeks, and most of that increase came even before the $700 billion bailout bill was passed. Now that our foreign creditors are less willing to purchase our debt, what debt we cannot sell to foreigners will be monetized through the Federal Reserve, resulting in increased inflation. If our policymakers fail to come to their senses, there is a real danger that we could end up in a hyperinflationary crisis such as the ones that beset Germany in the 1920s and Argentina and Zimbabwe in more recent decades.
1 person likes this
4 responses
• United States
14 Oct 08
Congratulations. You are now officially a kook just like everyone else who understands the law of supply and demand applies to the inherent value of any given currency. Literally for decades, many economists and intelligent people such as yourself have been warning about this while being ignored. Mostly I think the message was ignored because the resulting inflation, while still exponetial, was in the lower part of that devastating curve. Now, the rapidly accelerating portion of that curve is being achieved. It is time to balance the federal budget, reduce federal salaries and benefits, and reduce the size of government overall. It is time to do it now. It really does not matter whether it is McCain or 0bama who is elected. The proper response to this crises is the same.
3 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
14 Oct 08
If being for sound economic, and a monetary policy that is based on tired and true metal back currency makes be a kook then sign me up.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
14 Oct 08
Yep, and then everyone will blame it on Bush instead fo putting the blame where it belongs, which is on Congress... and more specifically the democrats and their misguided social engineering. Germany solved it problem by demonetizing their currency and starting over witha new one. I fully expect the US to eventually do the same thing.
2 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
14 Oct 08
If this is not an example of why the dollar needs to be placed back on the gold or some other metal back currency then I do not know what else can wake people up.
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
14 Oct 08
Hello Gewcew, Aw come on now, Sen. Obama explained it yesterday. Yup, just yesterday he put it in laymens terms when speaking to a plumber. The answer to your pressing question is that Sen. Obama intends to rob Peter to pay Paul. A scheme better known as 'wealth redistribution' or 'Robin Hood economics'. Of course, that poor, befuddled plumber is not the only one who is going to get mugged. In fact, we all will. As will our children and our children's children. Because, you see, using one of the three methods of dealing with the out-of-control spending is simply not going to cut it. We will need to capitalize on all three (actually four). The fourth being the sale of USA tangibles -- U.S. land/territory and U.S. business interests. In other words, we're royally screwed!
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
14 Oct 08
There is nothing fair about punishing someone who became successful with higher taxes. The only way any other country would give us a loan in our current situation would be to put up U.S. land/territory and U.S. business interests as collateral.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
14 Oct 08
Helllo Gewcew, Exactly! We are so screwed!
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
16 Oct 08
I was wondering how they will pay for the bailout. If they print more money, then the money is not worth anything, and of course it will affect Canada. Our dollar is now a little over eighty cents so that means if we order anything from the States we are going to pay heavy for that privilege. Now if you tax the people, then there is gong to be an uproar, not to mention that there are some who are on welfare and some who are disabled, and then the ones who are in the States illegally. I guess they will have to be taxed as well now. I have no idea what is going to happen now, but I suppose if nothing is done, there will be a depression.