vaccinations without needles
By LovingIt
@LovingIt (5396)
United States
November 7, 2006 1:53am CST
I read an article where they are working on developing vaccinations such as flu shots, etc. in the form of skin patches instead of having to get a shot with a needle. If this were done, would you be more or less likely to get a vaccination or would it make any difference?
3 people like this
8 responses
@ilse72 (1450)
• United States
7 Nov 06
It wouldn't really make a difference for me at this phase of my life but being honest, yes, I would take a patch over an injection anytime! I don't get flu shots or any other shots now. When I was self-injecting for migraines, it would have been nice...the migraine medication always gave me a very large painful knot that lasted for two days. It would be so ideal for children and would remove their fear of vaccinations.
Many meds currently come in these patches and I think you really will see more and more of them. I don't forsee all meds in patches though as some meds degrade when exposed to light or air so they would not be conducive to patches. I do think that, in time, meds that can't be give via patch, will be administered via the skin pores (like on the Star Trek show) rendering them painless as well.
@lectricky (680)
• United States
9 Nov 06
It wouldn't make a difference to me. I don't mind the needles, personally! i'm so used to them from donating blood and getting blood tests and IV stuff that they don't bother me. Come to think of it, I would be hesitant to use the patches due to my allergy to certain adhesives.