What do you prefer a good provider or a good lover???

in this generation, i'd rather choose a guy who is a good provider and a good lover roled into one... why? because surely its not enough to have a good lover alone because we will both die of hunger if he can't provide food for us, its useless to have a relationship if we don't something to sustain it... i guess being a good provider does not only mean having a lot of money so to buy love, being a good provider means being "responsible" enough to provide the basic needs of his lover or the whole member of the family.

Good is not a sufficient word to say I AM NOT EXPECTING MORE. Say in love or money, we wont say stop its enough. Thou a guy provides more we stil assume he is providing less and in love too..sometimes we are happy and sometimes we say its not upto our expectation. But lover can bring happiness but a provider can bring luxury. life needs happiness and peace

If someone have both, then that's a big advantage from him. I think it's compulsory to both sides because when you love, you have to provide something at least right?.. But to provide without love.. now that sounds bad.