how universe had started?
By volintine
@volintine (10)
India
November 8, 2008 7:30am CST
hey guys what do u think how universe had started it is due to the explosion of hypernova or it is due to the black hole the current science tells us that it is dude to the explosion of tiny black hole as small as atom so what do u think give your different views about it
1 person likes this
3 responses
@coolmailraj (2460)
• India
13 Nov 08
Hi.
I have read a bit about the different theories about the origin of universe. While i find the Big Bang theory a bit more reliable, The ring theory seems to be a bit more interesting. Certainly don't know which one is true. Just hope when the large hadron collider starts up next time, it answer this one.
5 people like this
@volintine (10)
• India
8 Nov 08
hey in that big bang theory tells us that it was due to explosion stephen hawking has revealed that it was due to the explosion of black hole in which +ve and -ve particle collide each other and when they come near to that black hole it sucked into it and black hole mass decrease like this it became contract and one day it explode and all radiation comes out from it all forces of nature too takes birth like this it came and also it has lead to half of the discovery of theory of everthing the only thing now is about gravity why gravity is weaker and how do we fit it into the quantum mechanics because master equation come from that.
@heathcliff (1415)
• United States
8 Nov 08
All current matter would have had to have already existed, therefore a supercondensed singularity exploding at the point where nuclear bonds are too tightly condensed could have created the current outward motion of the Universe. The question then becomes: "Where did that singularity come from?". As we continue to study the Universe and find more black holes and gravitational anomalies, it is still possible that despite the outbound nature of matter right now, we may see all matter once again condened into a singularity in 20 billion years. This would lead to another supercondensed structure that would again rupture and start the whole thing all over again. In this model, the physical nature of the Universe is more like a heart-beat, thumping in and out in a perpetual machine. Theologians can still apply their own spin to why this is, or which came first, the in-beat or the out-beat and why, but this could explain the PHYSICAL nature of "creation", that is to say: there is no creation or destruction of matter, ever.
