Who do u think is more danger to the world?
By navinshan
@navinshan (3933)
Canada
29 responses
@BVBF25 (753)
• United States
8 Nov 06
Osama, because I am american. If I were from somewhere else I would probably have a different oppinion. What Osama did was horrible to the innocent american people. You should never take political issues out on innocent civilians. That is the makings of a true coward. You can't beat our armies so you terrorize the innocent. That's just wrong.
@navinshan (3933)
• Canada
8 Nov 06
If u re a american, then i am a canadian as well, i can not full agree with your opinion, did u see the current american polls, which say 34% of people only support george w bush and rest for other parties, this is not my opinion, its ur countrys opinion, any way thanx for response
@BVBF25 (753)
• United States
8 Nov 06
Can you blame bush for protecting his people. We have to remind the world that America is a force to be reckoned with. Just like any other leader would. Osama's gonna strike again. He's such a punk! Sending children out to blow themselves up for his causes. Atleast Bush only uses grown men who signed up to fight for their country not vulnerable children. He's a terrorist, manipulator and deeply disturbed man.
@TannerSite (698)
• United States
8 Nov 06
Do you even know the basis of those polls navinshan? Do you know where that information comes from? What type of people participate in those polls? I'm assuing you don't because you're believing simply what you see on television rather than what is actually occuring in world society.
@TannerSite (698)
• United States
7 Nov 06
Is this a joke? Bin Laden is a terrorist and is responsible for killing millions of innocent people. For everyone who says Bush is dangerous I would love to hear your reasoning, and don't say something like "He declared war" or "He signed the prison bill." Since when is a man doing his job protecting a nation considered dangerous? Especially when compared to a man who puts children under the age of 8 to war.
Think about it.
@navinshan (3933)
• Canada
7 Nov 06
This is not a joke but a fact, think bush what is the need for him act as leader, why does he take the leadership role, just think, in case of north korea, why he so interferring, wants to create a havoc by preparing for a war, secondly take the case of iraq who is he to hang saddam hussein, since all the judges are bush puppets.so now what do u think who is more danger
@TannerSite (698)
• United States
8 Nov 06
North Korea threatened to arm nuclear missles, what would you have done in his position? Sat around and said "have fun?"
@MothersWorkAtHome (966)
• United States
8 Nov 06
Wow... ok.. I think the rules are if you cant say something nice dont say it at all? ok then..... :)
@MothersWorkAtHome (966)
• United States
8 Nov 06
This is pretty much a silly question.... who took out our people... who is probably planning more attacks.. yes thats MY answer!
@killailla (1301)
• Canada
8 Nov 06
George bush, we only know what the government and CNN want us to know about bin laden
@Pingilein (216)
• Germany
8 Nov 06
even if it is dangerous in an American forum to write, osama is dangerously however bush is also not harmless
@kalpsadit (624)
• Singapore
8 Nov 06
Ofcourse, Osama Bin Laden is the most dangerous person to the entire world and humankind. He is a terrorist
@naziashajid (847)
• Canada
7 Nov 06
Ofcourse Goeroge Bush. Who can forget his revengeful attacks in Afganisthan and Iraq!
