What are your arguments on the existance or non-existance of God?

The question of believing or not believing the existence of something arises only when we have clear vision and concept of that object. Many of us have no clear understanding of What God is because we have not directly experienced it.The conception of God is a reality greater than the reality of any conception which the human mind has developed anytime. It is beyond all that exist. It is beyond the sphere of experience of the mind whose vision is finite.It is beyond all descriptions because all descriptions relate to finite and observable objects. God is the Absolute essence and unchangeable basis of all ever changing,temporary existence of the forms and phenomena of creation. The Absolute is the ultimate reality of life. Thanks.

There are many reasons i believe in God. However there are truly many Gods, but only one who is the Greater, the Creator is who I will give my argument to why I believe at this time. The physical laws of thermodynamics tell us that you not get something from nothing, secondly the general law of relativity gives us examples of energy and mater. Thus if i am to believe that 13.7 billion years ago the big bang occurred (which i do) and that all mater in the universe and all energy that is in existence was released at this time. You can therefor calculate the cosmic weight and yields of energy, Also the laws of physics state the cosmos in in a constant state of decay. So I can only believe then that all mater and energy in the universe had to of had a definite point in time where it came into being, it did not just suddenly show up on its own, therefore it must have been created. This for me is evidence that the universe was created and has not simply been here for eternity, because again, constant state of decay, and energy lost by mechanical or chemical means, Cosmic Radiation, and all things say the universe had a beginning and will have an end.

I dont have any arguements either way..I dont believe in the Christian god and havent in many many yrs (though I was very much a believer and devoted Christian back in the day)...end of story..I dont care if others do..whatever works for them ya know just like believing as I do and walking the path I do works for me..

i too not a beliver but i too trust there is a supreme power which is always making his will in this world,i always thought that we all are a impulse in the brain of a super power.to be more simple we are just some mere puppets in the hand of god

I think the personification of God is wrong and see God as more of a creative spirit than a bearded old Santa in the sky. My views are from my religious upbringing as a catholic, my intense studies and love for the Scientology religion, my studies of various other religions and my natural inclination towards science and engineering, particularly how things work. I see quite clearly in my everyday life how everything around me was primarily a thought in someones mind. Before my tv was a tv, the thought of sending pictures and sound through the air existed. The excitement of such a possibility becoming true drove the imagination and creative force and the way to do things was found. I look also at science and find a strangeness in Quantum physics where everything in the universe can be seen to be made up of only Quarks and Leptons. You're a Quark, I'm a Quark, everyone's a Quark Quark. These minute sub atomic particles normally pop in and out of existence in micro micro seconds, displaying properties which defy all known physics. Having the ability to be here and there at the same time, or be here both before and after and while it is there, these curious particles have baffled scientists for many years. Having a natural inclination to live and die rather rapidly it seems they can be held together by Gluons which sounds rather trekky to me, and the reason for their extended duration is quite unknown but something causes them to persist. They make up you and me and everything, but why, and how? Some psychic experiments were done several years ago where the activity of these quarks and leptons were modified by the thoughts of psychics, indicating quite strongly that the reason for persistence of Quarks and Leptons is none other than observation or admiration. So thought admires a goal and quarks and Leptons willingly oblige. Anyone who has ever engaged in a complex creative project will recognise that desire, enthusiasm and belief in it's attainment seem to take on a force of their own and actually 'pull' events and objects into place in order to achieve the goal. So to me, God is thought which has no physical properties such as matter or energy, and exists not in space or time, but has the ability to create and admire. Makes you think again about the phrase "God is Love" !

There are multiple reasons, I think, for believing in God. Some of the most surface and obvious reasons are: 1) The Creation of the Universe from nothing, by nothing, and for nothing into something. Something does not come from nothing. A) Everything that begins to exist has a cause B) The universe began to exist C) Therefore, the universe had a cause 2) The teleology in the universe shows design. The best explanation for the that design is God. Nature alone cannot produce the over 120 anthropic constants necessary for life to exist. 3) Morality is best explained by God. Without God there is no basis for morality. Utilitarianism is a nice idea, but that doesn't explain WHY something is wrong. A) If God doesn't exist, absolute morals do not exist B) Absolute morals do exist C) Therefore, God exists 4) Personal Religious experience. This may be both the weaker and the strongest argument for God's existence. In a completely physical world, in a world in which nothing meta-physical exists whatsoever, it becomes extremely difficult to explain all religious phenomenon. This, of course, doesn't give any credence to any specific God (or gods) right off the bat, but we must take it into account. 5) Historical Evaluation of the evidence behind the resurrection of Christ I think, based on my work as a rising NT scholar, the resurrection turns out to be the best explanation for the events that occurred that Easter morning 2,000 years ago. Based on several factors (the early church belief in the resurrection, the claim and martyrdom of those who would know better, the multiply attested appearances, the fact of the empty tomb, the divergence of the resurrection of Jesus from any Jewish expectation, etc) I haven't seen any hypothesis which comes even close to accounting for what we know to be true on that Easter morning. There are, of course, perhaps dozens of sub-arguments which we could lay out but I think, as a brief inquiry into the arguments for and against the existence of God this will do. Hope this helps!!!

I believe in a higher power - which is likely how the universe came to be. Humans certainly did not create it. I don't believe all the religious hogwash that is present along with most people's belief in a higher power though. Humans are petty and ridiculous and unforgiving enough without considering how many thousands of times worse THAT would be. Any human who did all those things people claim God did would be gotten rid of by a majority decision.

Let's make an analog. A human can create a house, then who create the human? The answer is simple, it's God.

Hi android, I have no firm or established beliefs but I am very open minded and I'm quite willing to listen to others and I don't believe in knocking people for their own beliefs, all it does is show ingnorance and if you do actually bother to listen to someone elses beliefs you may just dispel a few myths you might have had about their belief and find it quite interesting.