What is Better Call of Duty 4 or World at War

I didn't ever get into the modern warfare one for some reason. World At War gets boring fairly quickly and the online is all glitched up all the time with cheaters and what-not...but I guess I would say World At War. I will be checking out Modern Warfare 2 however when it comes out.

Definitely COD 4 because all the previous COD games have been based on previous wars and I'm kinda tired of all that now. A friend of mines is getting COD 5 even though I gave him dozens of warnings that it would just be repeats with better graphics of COD 1,2 and 3!

Call of Duty 4's storyline was boring. But the multiplayer is good. Tons of people still play Call of Duty 4 as well. As for World at War, they went back to what they know: Past Wars. The graphics are almost on par with the rest of the 1st and 3rd person shooter industry. In addition, the Call of Duty series creator pumped huge hype on how World at War had co-op storyline ability. I was not impressed. Afterall, all the other 1st person and 3rd person shooters were already co-op ready. The mulitplayer is OK. Nothing spectacular. The same as all the other CoDs: Full of glitch brats and boosters. Very few people relax while playing, they are so intense. Makes me wonder when they lost the whole reason for video games: FUN.