terrorist to be defended or not?
By pkc3000
@pkc3000 (1266)
India
December 21, 2008 11:27am CST
Hello mylottians Do U feel that the lone terrorist who was captured by our force during the Mumbai attack should be defended by our country's lawyear or not.What is your view, if yes then why and if U are in negative then also express why.
pkc3000
2 responses
@j47lee (740)
• Canada
21 Dec 08
What i heard was that these are foolish young men of age ard 19...who are very poor... brainwashed by the real terrorists... they were offered a sum of 1 lakh rupees to be given to their family if they went to mumbai and killed the Indians and they couldnt come back alive..... in dire need of money.. they accepted the offer... wen they were questioned as to who was the leader.. they had no clue.. as the real leaders of terrorists... did no way had any communication with them.. they were actually just puppets to do their dirty work... and foolish young guys greedy for money actually offered themselves as a pawn in this killing spree.... so.. they should be given a fair trial... and instead of focusing on them.. maybe they should focus on the real terrorists behind this massacre....
@kiran8 (15348)
• Mangalore, India
21 Dec 08
I personally feel that every person has the right to defend himself.There are many issues involved here.He might have been brainwashed and has done this out of compulsion and fear or because he has been given some false promises, it is better that all this comes out in the course of the trial and the others who have such violent aspirations become aware of the kind of life that is in store for them.In fact these guys are like keyed up robots sent to do harm and then die, whereas the top people responsible for this whole thing are safe and enjoying life- in fact Dawood Ibrahim , who is supposedly behind this blast is planning his birthday bash at Karachi, where Pakistan is pampering him , and what about Pakistan?In my opinion it should be taught a proper lesson by the world communities