A tree falls in the forest ,does it make a sound if no one hears it ?

@ronnyb (6113)
Jamaica
December 22, 2008 7:10am CST
Have you ever heard this philosophical situations, I have and I am always puzzled as to logics behind asking this question. Is it that they are saying it cant make a sound unless someone hears it which to me means that they are saying that things are only real when it can be evidenced through our senses. Or are they saying that it gives of physical sound waves but these are useless unless someone hears it. Please help me understand it because just talking about it is giving me a headache.
1 person likes this
5 responses
@suzzy3 (8341)
22 Dec 08
Don't get a headache, the point is it does make a noise.it is that no one is around to hear it. Bombs are going off all over the world and just because I don't hear it from where I am .does not mean to say it did not happen.If you see what I mean,now I am getting a headache.
1 person likes this
@ronnyb (6113)
• Jamaica
22 Dec 08
Dont get a headache dear suzzy ,I think you have a good point ,even if it meant getting a headache ,thank you for your response as always
@kprofgames (3091)
• United States
14 Jun 09
I've often wondered about that statement. We all know that it's true. It does make a sound. Logical thinking says that it does. It's like saying if you have a radio on in the house and you're outside, does it still run. Well of course it does.
@ronnyb (6113)
• Jamaica
14 Jun 09
Good answer and thanks for reviving this one for me
• United States
14 Jun 09
You are most welcome and thank you too.
@ruperto (1552)
• Philippines
14 Jun 09
Perhaps it does not make a sound if no one hears it... Because a sound is basically made up two components: - a field of space and time-variant compression and expansion of air .... - and an audible perception from someone etc... Perhaps the second requirement is not meant... Perhaps there is no sound... unless perhaps "sound" is defined differently In which case, will someone please enlightened me :) Cheers
@ruperto (1552)
• Philippines
14 Jun 09
sorry, the third from the last line of above: "Perhaps the second requirement is not met." :)
@rvangeld (334)
• United States
23 Dec 08
It means that if no one is there to hear the sound that the tree makes, then it does not make a sound. This is how I have always thought of this quote.
@RMGray (16)
• United States
22 Dec 08
heheheh...I've always loved questions like these. My interpretation is this. ALL senses are mere interpretations of the brain. Touch, taste, sight, smell and sound are all captured from the external world, converted into bio-electrical signals and then interpreted by your individual brain. Therefore, I personally say "no"...if there is no ear to capture and convert the external stimuli to electrical impulses, and a brain to interpret it, then for all intents and purposes, there is no "sound". I have an interesting video posted on my blog which somewhat goes into this. Though it's spiritually oriented, I think it fits (http://tinyurl.com/6w7by7). Check it out and tell me what you think ;-). Good luck and don't get too stressed over these philosophical questions...at the end of the day, do they really matter? RM Gray http://www.GrowThyself.org