Obama may close Gitmo soon

United States
January 12, 2009 4:10pm CST
There is talk Obama may make the formal decision to close Gitmo as soon as his first week in office. Therefore transfering all those terrorist into THIS country and into our legal system. Good idea? Bad Idea? Tell me what you think?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
12 Jan 09
Yes, it needs to be closed. There is no reason why we should have a permanent prison in any other country unless it is to avoid giving people their constitutional rights - which is unacceptable.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Jan 09
How about not having the terrorist actually in our country. I am not comfortable with the idea of moving them all here.
• United States
13 Jan 09
Murderistic, just to be clear, it is not a permanent prison camp. It is a military base that is currently being used to house prisoners who are or were considered a threat to our national security. Releasing or moving the prisoners is one thing. Closing a military base is something quite different.
• United States
13 Jan 09
Obviously they should be treated as a high-risk prisoner and be held in a high-security prison, but what is the essential difference between a psychotic murderer and a terrorist being imprisoned in America? There is none. Both pose a threat to society. That doesn't make it right to export them to another country. They're our prisoners and they should be held here under our law. From what I understand some of these prisoners have not even had a trial yet.
• United States
12 Jan 09
Gitmo needs to be closed for many reasons, the facility is outdated and serves no real purpose. Many of these prisoners were actually innocent tokens of war, but I guarantee you this - President Obama will not let the guilty prisoners go free. The guilty prisoners will serve their sentence upon the supreme court ruling.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Jan 09
yep and give all our little secrets up to the terrorist in the process. Our federal trails are open for public record. So when these guys go on public trial the other terrorist we have not caught yet(all over the world) will know how we have been tracking them, how they got caught and any spies we have among them. NOt a good thing.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
13 Jan 09
I say it's about time! I don't think any decision has been made as to where the prisoners will go from there but since many of those at Gitmo are likely innocent I'd guess we have much more dangerous criminals already in our country. We can't have any credibility when we call for other countries to become democracies or when we preach about human rights as long as we still maintain a prison outside of the country where prisoners are detained indefinitely with no rights. Annie
• United States
13 Jan 09
I do not like the idea of them in our federal court system. The reason they were tried by the military courts was to protect our national secrets. But our federal court system is open to public record which means the other terrorist can easily find out what methods we are using to catch them and if we have spys among them. Things like that.....we really do not want them to know.It has the potential of really hurting our "war" on terror.
• United States
13 Jan 09
And prisoners in Guantanamo aren't tortured?
1 person likes this
@Guardian208 (1095)
• United States
13 Jan 09
The decision to close Gitmo is much more than the media and Mr. Obama would have us believe. Gitmo is a strategic military base. It's value is debatable, but that is not really what is being talked about here or in the media. It is not solely a prison camp. It has been portrayed that way but it has been a military base for us since 1898. It is the oldest naval military base we have. It must have a significant strategic value since it has weathered the base closing that we experience every time there are cuts in military spending. So the question is really two-fold. 1. Should we stop using the base as a military prison? And 2. Should we close the naval base? It seems that he is willing to sacrifice the strategic value of a military base to quell the negative public opinion of its use as a prison. That I think is wrong. If he must do something, remove the prisoners but keep the base.
• United States
13 Jan 09
I do not know what exactly he is going to do. We will find out soon they say. I know Cubian leaders have been preasuring Obama to completely close the post and turn it back over to them. We will have to see if he is listening to them.