Any one here with a scientific back ground?
@freethinkingagent (2501)
February 21, 2009 9:05pm CST
I was wondering because i would like to show you my unified field theory and proof for the existence of God.
8 responses
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
• Thailand
22 Feb 09
Wow, This I want to see. If you can state something that has escaped Hugh Everett, Richard Feynman, Stephen Hawking, Freeman Dyson, Einstein and all the other great minds that have attempted it you will deserve a place in history. Please include the necessary mathematical proofs so that I can give your theory the consideration it deserves.
1 person likes this
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
• Thailand
22 Feb 09
No, not trying to make fun of you. I would never do that to a fellow member of the elite Order of the Silver Star here on myLot.
The point I was trying to make, in my less than graceful manner, is that any theory that is represented to be scientific must be subject to scientific proof.
@freethinkingagent (2501)
•
22 Feb 09
yes very good as I said I will have to come up with a language to express my 'expressions' and wave formula, it should not be that difficult as it is a not a time dependent formula as it it deals with the structure of the 'non universe' before the creation of the universe and the duality of polarities in infinite n, the suspension of energies to create the universe and the constant support of the energies to the universe, and finaly the solution of everything reverting back to prim energy or the expansion of the universe to infinite energy, by retuning to the beginning. Thus it can be implied as God, (not an old grey bearded man), but infinite positive and negative energy existing as two separate but equal causes, Because they are both equal there is no need to cancel out each other and without (t), no need for a universe existed, so why did it happen? A need to divide the all by nothing? This also leaves a possibility of not just one universe because we are dealing with an infinite quantity but (n) universes. I say unified because it also supports the physical laws of thermodynamics and classical physics.
1 person likes this
@freethinkingagent (2501)
•
22 Feb 09
I hope your not making fun of me it will be difficult writing quantum mechanic equations in a forum that does not allow characters, I will have to write my own "mathematical scientific language" that you may be able to rewrite in a proper equasion.
Wave formulas are kinda hard to write here lol.
Wave formulas are kinda hard to write here lol.1 person likes this
@cvrajan (354)
• India
22 Feb 09
I tasted sugar and it tastes sweet and nice. Why do I need a scientific theory and proof to explain what I know as sweet? Even if I write a theory, in what way it is useful for another who has no personal experience of tasting sugar? In what way can he grasp the true taste of sugar by reading the theory?
In fact, even bibles, upanishads, Bhagavat Gita and so many scriptures only try to expound the existance of God and the joy of union with God in so many ways, though you can't call them theories. But even reading them theoretically cannot give you the experience of God.
Mata Amritanandamyi used to say "If you write "sugar" in a piece of paper and lick it, will it give the taste of sugar?"
Ramakrishna Paramahamsa says "Scriptures are like grocery lists. They list items to be procured from the shop; that way they are useful. Once you have bought the items, the list is again useful to verify whether everything is received as per list. Afterward, yo can throw away the list. Likewise scriptures are useful to know ways to reach God; Once you have a Godly experience, they are again useful to verify whether your experiences matches with what ancient seers have mentioned. Beyond that scriptures have no usefulness."
IF that is the state of affairs even for holy scriptures, what to talk of a mathematical proof?!!
1 person likes this
@mathss1 (1181)
• United States
23 Feb 09
I tasted sugar too
but i need a proof that sugar is sweet
have a proof
or
need one?lol
we need a proof for everything a proof for the existence of god
I cannot taste god but can taste sugar
I have a few doubts in the bhagvad gita
1 Bhagavad Gita 15.13
I become the moon and thereby supply he juice of life to all vegetables."
moon giving juice of life ??
and many more doubts a billion of them
@urbandekay (18278)
•
22 Feb 09
I would be interested to see this
all the best urban
1 person likes this
@gjabaigar (2200)
• Philippines
22 Feb 09
^_^ Howdy!.... freethinkingagnet!....
Wow!.... Please share your greatest ideas. That will be so very great freethinkingagnet! So, go for it! Tasty and yummy.... lol....
Well I'm not really a scientific or genius. I just like to know more informations and the ideas of different perspective and views such as in the field law of science and nature, cosmos, law of gods and God and other fields of metaphysics, psychic, spirituality and the like.
^_^ God Bless Us!.... Peace!.... Thanks!.... and Enjoy!.... myLot!....
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
22 Feb 09
God's proof of existence is in all of creation and all of the stars and planets. I don't see why we need scientific formulas to prove God exists.
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
26 Feb 09
Hi Islander,
I've had this debate with one of my friends from Thailand before. The problem is that it has been impressed upon you that you can surmount the problem of odds with numbers. There are a couple problems with this theory. The first is that evolution is not gradual; adaptation only occurs within species, while new species arise resultant of significant alteration to the genome. This is not something that happened once in a chance occurrence, and I have told you umpteen times that no one endorses Sagan's "quite by chance" theory anymore, not even Dawkins.
The second problem is DNA. DNA itself is not active; the cell is the machine, and the information contained in DNA is the operating system (system software that provides instructions for a computer). The information is useless unless the cell can understand it, so it is written in adherence to complex rules of syntax, a bona fide language. Language is not simply an equation that is either right or wrong; you cannot quantify a language. Languages are entirely made up.
Where did you get your information from? It sounds like the old Darwinian theory to me.
1 person likes this
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
23 Feb 09
Islander, when you spot a wristwatch in the sand on the beach, do you ponder whether or not that wristwatch was fused into being by sand and metals in the beach over billions of years? Or can you tell it was created? That is how I feel about the universe and all creation on earth. It is so obviously created that there is no need for science or math to tell me so.
@mathss1 (1181)
• United States
23 Feb 09
According to some atheists
A watch was created by the big bang
Creation of a watch (by chance)
There was nothing the world was blank suddenly a few parts appeared out of nothing(source is still being investigated by scientists)second hand ,minute and hour hand of various size appear a steel body some straps some gears
And they combine to form a watch (out of nothing)
The watch falls on a battery and starts working.
We atheists have an explanation for everything.
We were on a quest but our quest got banned.We had a mathematical proof for the non existence of god but our mathss got banned.Those who worship source are always looked down at.
:-)
Have a gr8 time
Njoy
@alex55 (50)
• Dominican Republic
4 Mar 09
Dear FTA-remember me Alex55.You are on the right path closer than anyone else.
My "religion "uses this concept already.Remember me when you tried to define your religion 's tennets.I remember that one "Thou slall be educated".
I am licensed engineer in electrical field.I read about your education in ancient cultures and I told you that I like you as an endeavouring person for getting the deepest answers.
I would give you my writtings which are a mixture of materialism ,science and
gnostic philosophy and there you can find some answers how I applied that unified field theory.
The problem is that I wrote in two languages at the same time and I have to convert into English everything but I don't have time.Actually my wife is against me spending this time.I was on this site to hear from Abrahamic -someone who claim s that gnpsticism is an evil cult.Somehow I would like him not interfering with this site anymore because it make me bad blood.
@freethinkingagent (2501)
•
5 Mar 09
Wow thanks for answering. I got a little self conscience when nobody directly replied to what i had written, i was thanking they went of saying "Yap, he's completely mad". LOL. It s a hard concept to understand and even harder to try and relate, especially when you can not post a decent equation in this forum. mathematical it makes sense if you interpret the numbers the way i do. What two languages are they written in? Thanks for responding and for responding to my long run on.
@rameshkumaar57 (5908)
• India
22 Feb 09
I am eagerly waiting for your proof of existence of God. My only worry is, is he going to be a Christian god or a Islamic god or a Hindu god, or are you going to prove that God is a universal being common to every body. ?
