Former First Lady "Totally Forgot" President's Address to Congress
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
March 4, 2009 9:34pm CST
I guess maybe for Lady Laura Bush it's "Out of sight, out of mind"; the recently departed First Lady told ABC News she did not watch President Obama's address to Congress on Tuesday night because she "totally forgot about it."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=6966519&page=1
She added, "The next day I thought it was so ironic that for eight years I would be a nervous wreck before the State of the Union, and for days before, as George would be preparing his speech, worried about it and thinking about what was going to be in the speech. And this time it came and went and I didn't even think about it."
No, I'm not here to attack Laura Bush, I have no desire to do that, I just found it interesting that she didn't watch her husband's successor's first speech before the Joint Sessions of Congress. I'm not sure if I'd have expected her to watch it to see what it's like being "on the other side" or if she maybe would have had a natural curiosity to compare performances and reactions.
Maybe she's just so relieved to be out of Washington D.C. she really didn't even give it a thought! What do you think?
Annie
3 people like this
11 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I'm not surprised. I can't remember the last time I watched a president's address to congress and you know how into politics I am. I just find those things boring as hell. Sure, if my wife were giving it I'd care, but since Bush isn't president, I'd have to go with you on the "Out of sight, out of mind".
3 people like this
@Savvynlady (3684)
• United States
6 Mar 09
Well, she has her life like anyone else, and for eight years and some before that, she was the First Lady of the Nation and before that of Texas. If I was her, I wouldn't look, read, smell or touch anything political unless by choice and that goes for any ex first lady(except Hillary cause she ain't quitting no time soon). but that's my own opinion. and you can't get mad with Barbara either because she is still in the hospital recuperating.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
19 Apr 09
I wasn't MAD at anybody, not at all. I just found it interesting that Laura had said she'd forgotten. I don't mean that in a bad way either. I wonder that about all former First Ladies or other members of a President's family - they live their lives in a fishbowl for all those years and then it's back to "normal", if you can ever have a normal life after that.
Annie
@Savvynlady (3684)
• United States
19 Apr 09
She probably did; the other day the President was on tv again but I didnt see it myself; Plus let's think about this. The Bushes were probably trying their best to move back into their home; They have been gone for eight years due to George's presidency, and with no one telling you that you have to do this or have to do that, I wouldnt want to see a press conference, a State of the Union or nothing again if it was up to me. And I hope I wasn't being accusatory when I made my earlier comment. She's a free bird now, she don't owe nothing to no one.
@collieluv28 (388)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I'm pretty sure that neither Laura nor George had any interest at all in seeing Obama's address to Congress. They've had it with politics for a while. Of course I could be wrong. George W. probably still thinks that the world adores him. I did watch the address by the way & found it to be interesting & well performed. There is no doubt that Pres. Obama is a gifted speaker. I am quite pleased with out current President.
1 person likes this
@thedogshrink (1266)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I don't think it's strange at all. Think of what this Lady has been thru with her husband for the last 8 years! I'm sure she is so happy to be home again and getting back to her own life that it would be super easy for it to slip from her mind. And she as much as said that in the quote you provided, if you think about it.
I also can imagine she would make sure it "slipped her mind" since she's probably had it with politics for now, but she wouldn't say that to the press -- because she is such a fine Lady.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Mar 09
Well comparing her mother in law is having health issues (and under went heart surgury recently) I am sure she had other things on her mind. ALso if you saw Bush Sr. at the swearing in than you know he is not doing well either. So it looks like she may have her hands full right now. Plus she is probly so glad to be out of the fish bowl (white house) and back to a somewhat normal life with an actual degree of privacy that she is enjoying it. She was a first lady that liked her privacy. She never liked the spot light or was comfortable with it. I think she may do an interview every now and again but for the most part I think she will stick to her personal life. Which is fine. Some former first ladies want to go on with a public life like Hilary Clinton. Some perfer a private life like Nancy and Barbara. Which ever makes them happy is fine.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I certainly agree that whichever makes any of our former First Ladies happy is certainly fine and they all spend a long enough time living in that fish bowl you mentioned. As I told a previous poster, I hadn't been aware of Barbara Bush's surgery until after I'd started this discussion and days after I'd first heard of Laura's comments regarding the new President's speech. I did NOT mean any sort of disrespect towards either of the Bush First Ladies, believe me. I don't know if Barbara's pre-scheduled surgery had been made public prior to last night but that was when I first heard of it, after it had ended.
Annie
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
7 Mar 09
they did not announce it that I know of til she was already in the hospital. They did that I guess to keep the press down so she could have some privacy.
I know you did not mean anything against her or the Barbara. I thought it was a little unusual til I heard about Barbara being in the hospital.Looks like the Bush's have a lot of health issues going on right now (including Bush Sr) so Laura probly has her hands full. Or she just might be completely sick of politics after 8 years in the white house and just wants a complete break from it. Who knows.
1 person likes this
@NewsBabe24 (2)
• India
7 Mar 09
I believe former president and former first lady have lost interest in white house affairs. This is simple.
1 person likes this
@whiteheather39 (24403)
• United States
5 Mar 09
Personally if I had been in her shoes I would not have bothered much about it. It would not have been on my list of priorities. She probably is still getting used to being just a normal citizen after 8 years of being in the limelight. I could see how she would forget although I am pretty sure George was watching very closely.
BTW I did not watch it either.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
7 Mar 09
Actually there is probably a very good reason why Lady Laura Bush did not want to hear Obama address Congress. She may be a very quiet lady and does not like being in the limelight. But is it a law that one has to watch Obama's speeches? Do you want to see a video of her applausing Obama, and what if she were there, and she looked coldly at him? Then you would have had the discussion with the title "Former First Lady does not show the proper respect to our new President."
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
9 Mar 09
It is just that you have been questioning the motives of other people, like for instance, Sarah Palin, that it seems that you put the discussion maybe to say something unkind about Laura Bush's not attending or not being interested in Obama's speech as if as the former first lady she definitely should not have been there.
And it also makes me suspect that if she was there, you might question why she said such a statement or why she did not smile when she shook his hand, etc.
And besides, it makes it look that Laura Bush can only miss Obama's address to the Congress only if she had a very good reason, like illness in the family, etc.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
8 Mar 09
Suspenseful, I think your response was totally uncalled for. I said nothing derogatory about the former First Lady and I didn't start this discussion to criticize her or put her down. It was probably a fairly natural thing that the reporter interviewing her about her life since leaving the White House would ask if she'd seen the man who replaced her husband give his first speech to the Joint Sessions of Congress. If she'd have chosen to watch the speech on her own TV in the privacy of her own home she wouldn't have been in the limelight and she certainly wouldn't have been - nor SHOULD she have been - videotaped for her reaction! Anyway, it's certainly no law that anyone has to watch any President's speeches!
For my part, I simply found it interesting that the former First Lady, who had been thrust into the limelight whether she liked it or not for the past 8 years of her life - considerably longer if you count the campaign - had forgotten about the yearly speech that had been such an important part of her life in recent years. I didn't mean it in a bad or disrespectful way at all. Heck, I can't say that I blame her at all for putting Washington politics as far from her mind as possible.
Annie
1 person likes this
@morethanamolehill (1586)
• United States
11 Mar 09
suspenseful asks,"But is it a law that one has to watch Obama's speeches?"
Not yet. But he's only been President for a couple of months.
1 person likes this
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
5 Mar 09
Annie,
Of course it couldn't have been other distractions such as maybe her mother-in-law's impending open heart surgery, could it?
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I'm sorry, Rodney, I didn't mean to jump on you there, I really hadn't heard of Barbara Bush's surgery until later last night. I do understand everyone, including former First Ladies, has their own personal lives and family matters that take center stage, as well they should.
Annie
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
5 Mar 09
Annie,
It wasn't really intended to be sarcastic but rather to point out that people do have other things in their lives that don't pertain to a presidential address. Still, she may have been like me and avoided it purposefully.
1 person likes this
@jerzgirl (9291)
• United States
5 Mar 09
I can actually see this happening. She paid attention more because her husband was front and center and she was expected to be there - either visibly or behind the scenes. That isn't the case any more. She no longer has that social responsibility, so I can totally see her "forgetting" to watch it. Hell - I didn't even bother watching it, and I supported him for election!!
1 person likes this