adult stem cells
ban lifted
big business
cloning
embryonic stem cells
experimentation
stem cell research
stem cells
More Political Misinformation
@flowerchilde (12529)
United States
March 9, 2009 12:11pm CST
Today Pres. Obama signed a bill to federally finance "embryo stem cell research" and said a little speech afterwards claiming there had been a ban on it for the last eight years. This is not true. The only thing banned was the production/cloning of new embryos (fertilized human eggs) for the express purpose of experimentation. You couldn't produce new life, take what you want and then destroy it. This is the ban that has been now lifted.
- Some people believe any sort of use of embryos is highly unethical (I would be in that crowd:)) especially, as even though the embryonic stem cells have the ability to change into or be used for any sort of cell needed for whatever organ, etc, the experiments upon them have not brought thus far any benefit! Have even caused tumors a time or two! But adult stem cells have brought quite a bit of beneficial research, results and therapies, and is fast moving toward transplants. We can garner these from all organs, etc, and also from amniotic fluid and the placenta and umbilical cord, for all the kinds needed. Some believe it is an economic some have wanted the ban lifted, as eventually they will be able to produce and sell embryos.
- How far do you think it is ethical for us to go in embryo research? Do you think adult stem cell research financing will dry up? (Even though so promising.) And embryonic stem cell pursued instead?
3 people like this
8 responses
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
10 Mar 09
I've noticed that when an untruth is spoken enough times, they them selves believe it! Same with most media these days!
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Mar 09
I have to correct your correction, flowerchilde. In 2001 Bush banned federal funding for research into stem cell lines created after that date. At that time only 21 lines had been produced so federally funded research came virtually to a stand still due to the limited availabilitly of material. There has never been a time when embryos were created for the express purpose of experimentation. Previously, as now, embryos that would otherwise have been discarded have been donated by the patients at IFV clinics who no longer needed them for this research. Private research has continued in a number of ways but, eight years later, it's still a fact that the most flexible...the best hope for the most people...lies in the embryonic stem cells which can be programmed to become any cell in the body.
As far as adult stem cells go...they can only become what they have already been programmed to be. There has been some success with spinal cord injuries to rats but, other than that, there have been no human trials yet. Amniotic fluid, placenta and umbilical cord cells also have limitations that embryonic stem cells do not have.
As far as producing and selling embryos, federal funding will make that pretty much impossible due to regulations and oversight as that is extremely unethical. Fertility clinics have literally thousands of left over embryos belonging to patients who have the option of donating them or having them destroyed. Either way, these embryos are not destined to become a human being. With the backing of federal funding research can come out of the dark ages and many lives can be saved.
2 people like this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
9 Mar 09
If it was so promising private research would be jumping on board to finance it like they do the adult stem cell research. As a matter of fact there are reports of scientists just recently being able to produce fully programmable embryonic type stem cells from adult stem cells - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Stunning-Stem-cells-from-adult-cells/articleshow/4242554.cms
***The Case For Adult Stem Cell Research - http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/winter01/stem_cell.html
Also, more and more the embryonic stem cells are being discovered to be highly unstable and experimentation has not had good results. Whereas many benefits have come through adult stem cell research such as with bone marrow transplants. It's perhaps one step more to produce the cells needed from adult stem cells, but how advantageous is skipping that one step if the accelerated growth of embryonic stem cells are unstable and risky? - http://www.usnews.com/blogs/heart-to-heart/2009/03/04/why-embryonic-stem-cells-are-obsolete.html
- http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46546
I think frankensteinian science will indeed bring in a new dark age, to say nothing of karma. It's those researchers who depend on government financing who want this, as they cannot attract much private funding, as private industry realizes there is not much profit in creating cures and medicines from the highly unstable embryonic stem cells.
..best regards..
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
12 Mar 09
Hi MsTickle, I think this site isn't bad (some of them are into too many medical terms!)
- http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/pros-and-cons-of-stem-cell-research.htm
1 person likes this
@MsTickle (25180)
• Australia
13 Mar 09
Hmm, very interesting. I don't understand why they continue with the embryone, blastocyst stem cell research and don't concentrate on cord and adult research. There are no ethics involved with either of these two means of obtaining stem cells.
When all is said and done, Obama seems to place little value on new life and family...which seems a contradiction given his own family situation.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
12 Apr 09
That is what is happening in Europe. They are all for embryonic stem cell research and it is hard to get funds for adult stem cell research. Not only does embryonic stem cell research destroy a future baby but it does not work. The cells turn cancerous. I think this is just an excuse to encourage abortions and what is going to happen when they run out of embyros from abortion clinics and later left over from fertility clinics (because I am sure that they will make a law making it harder to save the embryos to transplant into barren women's wombs) then they will do what used to be done in the 20s and 30s, deciding that only certain women are fit to bear chlldren and encourage those they consider not fit to donate their eggs for embryonic research.
And I thought this was just bad science fiction.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
16 Apr 09
I've been waiting to see a definite link somewhere between growing government and what I think of as frankensteinian 'science'.. now I can see more clearly the potential you have pointed out!
I've often heard we are right behind Europe in our trends.. It's sad! As adult stem cell research has been so promising! How many times to we hear stem cell research as only embryonic? If you're not for embryonic stem cell research you are believed to be against stem cell research. It's the twilight zone and science fiction all rolled into one.
@AmbiePam (93953)
• United States
9 Mar 09
Yes, political misinformation is definitely right. Funny how that happens so often. I wish the researchers and their funding groups would be satisfied with what they can get from umbilical cords and the like. We're going into territory that is not black and white anymore to a lot of people. Nothing seems to be off limits.
2 people like this
@celticeagle (168334)
• Boise, Idaho
10 Mar 09
I am glad this bill was passed. Doesn't seem off track for miscommunication to take hold. This research has such promise I hope that something can come of it and that it doesn't just dry up. As far as the financing goes I think it is popular enough that some where there should be a multi-million dollar broker somewhere that wants to put a hand into the pot and help pioneer the whole thing. We need it to happen. Even people that don't agree with all of it must agree there is potential here and we need to see what can come of it.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
10 Mar 09
Actually embryonic stem cell research hasn't been all that promising (hence such low private financial support) but adult stem cell research has netted some good benefits like bone marrow transplanting. Embryonic stem cells are even rather unstable and have caused tumors. But as it hasn't produced much promise it has to get taxpayer funding to continue.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Mar 09
You know Obama, no lie to blatant!
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31634)
• United States
9 Mar 09
I am not in favor of embryonic stem cell use. As you pointed out, adult stem cells have been much more successful. It's the total disregard of the value of life that allows people to justify the use of embryos--babies. They are babies, life has begun and although they are not yet formed they are still babies to me. The anti-life (pro "choice") activists are happy with this because it further dehumanizes the most helpless victims of humanity.
I did not vote for this president but I was hoping he would be very good. In the past 6 weeks he's continued to astonish me in the worst ways. This lifting of the restrictions convinces me that he's just as morally bankrupt as any other politician.
1 person likes this