A O E II vs A O E III...........The difference is like X P vs V I S T A
By neobcrec
@neobcrec (169)
India
March 11, 2009 4:46am CST
The AOE III is not that much impressive.....
Moreover lots of parameters have made it very much COMPLEX.
AOE III is totally like VISTA,having lots of features but not so user friendly,so not POPULAR also.
AOE III is totally boring........boring.........& boring.
5 responses
@riadyawan (75)
• Indonesia
13 Mar 09
AOE II and AOE III is really different, although I still love both. AOE III with it's 3D graphic is very good, but we must have at least mid-end computer to play it. So I don't play AOE II because my computer can't be used to play that. Not fulfill the system requirement.
And AOE II is also good to be played although it don't use 3D graphic. It doesn't hard to play the game, my computer can play it smoothly.
@irishfury187 (375)
• United States
13 Mar 09
aoe 3 was alright, wasnt the best but I was able to play it without any trouble, but aoe2 was amazing, I still have it somewhere but havent played it in forever, I used to play aoe 2 online alot, back when they allowed you to play online, wasnt too fond of the deathmatch but they had these games called "blood games" which was cool, you didnt have to gather any goods you just set a character on a flag and it would spawn the character over and over until you reached the set pop limit, and then after so many kills you would get a new unit to spawn, they were quite interesting games.
@dieded4 (19)
• Canada
4 Aug 09
Amen brother! The only reason I'm using vista right now is because my laptop drivers don't work with xp, but thank god I can not play Aoe III, and instead play Aoe II. I tried Aoe III for a bit, but didn't really like it, with its cards, and trading posts. What ever happened to good old simple war?