Is a teenager a child?

United States
March 25, 2009 1:36am CST
Call me strange but it bothers me when I hear an adult call a teen, anyone from 13-17,a child. Isn't a child a ges from 4-12?Call me a crazy but it seems like a way to demean teens.There is a huge difference between a 6 year old and a 15 year old.What do you think.? am I being too sensitive?
4 people like this
17 responses
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
25 Mar 09
yes you are two sensitive, a child is a child until an adult, a teen is a child, but has developed further and is just in between. or another way of putting it is a teen is a stage in a child life, adults have stages too, young adults, middle aged, and elderly
1 person likes this
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
26 Mar 09
legal and medical are different, biologically speaking a teen is a child until the age of majority, now when the age of majority is 21 there is no problem, but when it is 18 well 18 they are an adult and 17 they are not, medically it is when the cerebral cortex is fully development in the brain and it is not in the minor, that is the medical difference 100 years ago there was no such definition as teen it didn't exist. 8 years worked in sweat shops like adults because they were considered adults. it might not be fair but it is the legal system that is doing it not the medically system that knows the biological difference. I didn't make this up it is a fact.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Apr 09
Medically there are many people who are of age but are not adults. But if you think a child is achild until 20, then there are many rights that should be taken away from teens. Shouldn't it be against the law for a child to drive a car?
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
If teens are deemed children , then they sgouldn't be able to work, drive , or choose a college until they are 20. Children shouldn't be allowed to make their own decisions until they are deare adult. Here in the Ststed , an 19 year old, child in your view,, can vote. Isn't that wrong?
1 person likes this
@coffeebreak (17798)
• United States
25 Mar 09
I think society ages kids to fast these days. I think society today is so busy trying to make kids grow up faster these days that they are hardly a "kid" at all...they go from toddler to kid to adult and they are only 14! When MY Gd started kindergarten, yes Kindergartin... they sent out a paper saying "your child has t know these things..." and one of them were computers skills that basically at 5 she had to be computer literate. She couldn't even write her name.. but she knew her way around a key board. Even toys are more "older" in age stipulation. There's no silly cartoons, only 13 year old girls dressed in such bling that they look about 21 - i.e. Hanna MOntana among others and the dress for young girls today - again... at age 7 they are dressed in skimpy little things... they have nothing to show, but once older when they do.. they are trained to wear that skimpy little stuff. What happened to wanting to liking Care Bears and Tinkerbell and other little kid characters? I htink it is more structured to hit the girls than boys tho..A boy dresing or liking things belonging to a chartoon character or icon, gets laughed at... always has been like that but a little girl "enhanced" with My LIttle Pony stuff.. is "just to cute!" I think it is also just in how the word is used.. my two kids are police officers and parents of their own children.. but I still refer to them as my "kids" even use the word "baby" when I speak to them... that's the mother in me talking, yes, but the same words.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
Kids, I mean 12 and younger , don't play with toys anymore.I don't know what happened . Was it computers? The lack of outdoor play? i don't know.I wasn't thinking of the 12 year olds , but the 15 and 16 year old who are getting their first job, learning to drive, selecting a college. How in the hell can yo call them a child? Unles they are your little vavy, they are teens , bot children.
• United States
2 Apr 09
Don't get me started. It either should be that you are a Full adult at 19 or 21. Not half your rights you get at 19 and then the rest at 21!I think you should be an offical an adult at 20. Voting, smoking , drinking , all of it you can do legally at 20.
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
26 Mar 09
Well, sometimes I think of them as "kids" or "children", but I don't think of them as "little kids". I have two teens now 13 and 16. I often refer to them as my "kids" or children. I don't think it'd demeaning to them, but I understand why you're asking the question. They are one their way away from childhood and working toward adulthood, but they aren't there yet.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
True . They are not there yet. That's why I like the term teen. It is like it is a short version of between, between childhood and adulthood. When is comes to your kids, they will Always be your children, even when they are 80, they will Still be your babies.I will never have a problem with a parent calling their kid their child.
• Canada
3 Apr 09
This is a tough question. They're not children but they're also not grown-up. After I read it, I had to think about how I refer to 13-17 year olds. I think I'm guilty of calling them children (or kids) but I think it really depends on the situation. If I'm talking to a friend about her kids, I will say son, daughter, child, children, kid or kids -- I sometimes call them young adults or teens but it doesn't roll off the tongue as easily. Our kids are 26 and 29 and people still call them children or kids when they ask about them. I think I'm going to pay attention to the 13-17 year old group and see how I refer to them on a regular basis, then I'll come back with a more enlightened response ( I hope )
• United States
3 Apr 09
Don't give yourself a hard time. Your children will always be your children no matter how old they get. and that goes for your friends kids too.what was getting me upset is when an adult, other than their parents. Me, I don't use child or children but I will use kid. but you can say he or sge is a 30 old kid. Or The kids these days.But it isn't about them, it is abour me being so much older than they.It is said with love. Example, tonight on Jeopardy there was a question I knew but all of the kids, average 30, didn't know.So don't give yourself a hard time.
1 person likes this
@HelloMickey (1655)
• Hong Kong
26 Mar 09
I am 32, and my mum still calls me a child as well. I have passed the sensitive period and finally accept it. Call me a child is because she thinks I am as pure as a child and of course she thinks I don't know many things in the real world. No matter whether I am that pure or innocent, it is just her thought that I am a child and should be protected by her. After I found out why she treated me like a child, I am thankful of how she wants to protect me all her life. I was sensitive too when I was in high school, I would like to be treated like an adult, I thought I was not a child anymore. But life is so short, our childhood is even shorter. So enjoy the moment others will call you a child, it is the moment that we should treasure. In the real world, after you was out of school and is in employment, no one will treat you as a child.
• United States
26 Mar 09
When I started the post I was talking about adults other than your parents. to you loving parents, you will always be their child.My mom would tell me she would still think of me as her little baby even if I live to be 80.What gets me is when a teen is suppose to be able to plan their future , drive a car , even get a job and still be considered a child. It doesn't make sense. we have the perfect term , teenager, we sgould use it more.
@JoEy137 (17)
• United States
26 Mar 09
no your not! im 16 and my parents treat me like im 6! then everyone wants to use the excuse 'oh your too young your just a child!' im all like CHILD?! i mean im 16 and look 18! do i look like a child to you? but no your not crazy! at all! and yes it does demean all teens. there are 5 stages of life. baby child teen adult elderly people need to see people for the age they really are and not degrade us with names we dont belong under.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
Thanks for your response. If you are old enough to apply for colleges, frive a car, then you are certainly not a child.Just know that there is one adult out there that gets just as angry as you when i hear Any teen called a child.Take Care.
• India
25 Mar 09
I think there’re two aspects to this. One, of course you are right and I myself could never really digest the word ‘child’ when I was going thru that particular age bracket…that one word was enough to transform me from a perfectly sane docile polite teenager to a raving and ranting and rebel-without-a-cause banshee screaming at the top of her lungs! The second aspect however, is that there are people who like to address everybody quite younger to them as ‘child’. They would use it to describe an entire gamut from actual children to teenagers to young adults, too. They are usually the protective and imposing types who never understand that the child has actually grown or should be allowed to grow up on its own.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Apr 09
I am far from being a teen but I get the same reaction whenever I heard any adult, save their parents, call a teen a child.
• Canada
25 Mar 09
I don't think that you are being too sensitive at all. I agree with you completely. My mother used the excuse that when I am her age, I'll see them as "little" too. HA! I'm 27, married to a much older man (63), and he doesn't even see teens as children. Sure teens are "minors" in that they can not drink or vote, but they are not CHILDREN. Teens are teens, and that's what we call them.
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Mar 09
Thanks for your response.It is so good to know I am not alone.Send all my best to hubby.
• United States
25 Mar 09
I think that the reason we have the word teen is so that we have something else to call the people who are not children but not yet adults. It kind of irks me too when I hear people call 16 and 17 year olds children. Unless of course it's "my children" or something along those lines.
1 person likes this
@Vladilyich1 (1454)
• Canada
25 Mar 09
I agree. In my opinion, childhood ends by the 9th birthday. At that time a person has learned almost all of the unique things that they ever will...language, right and wrong, the personality is set. After that, it's a matter of gaining experience and honing the skills that they already have. Teenagehood is a matter of "experimenting" with knowledge that they already have. A teenager gains experience to understand everything that they have learned so far. It is a time to make mistakes that are unacceptable in "adults".
• United States
28 Mar 09
At 9? Wow. When I was 9 , I was learning to play the violin.
@ulalume (713)
• United States
25 Mar 09
Childhood is a state of mind. It shouldn't really be an age. Though, I suppose regarding things like movie tickets...if people are going to call a teen a child, that teen should inadvertantly only have to pay for a childs ticket. I think you are being a little sensitive, but you have the right to be if you feel that way. I don't think its that big of a deal. If you're mature, then whatever group society puts you in...it doesn't matter. Heck, some adults are like big babies and some kids seemingly do more mature things then said adults. It all varies substantially.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
If you are mature, being called a child is demeaning.
@eselmaro (208)
• Philippines
26 Mar 09
In my part, I think what they called 'child' is not its literal meaning, that age from 12 and below. The range of teens are those of age end with the root word -teen. Technically, it is from 13-19. They called them 'child' because their parents want them to be treat like a child itself, their parents or whoever older than them knows well in this journey. Bottomline, they just want the best for their teenagers. Thank you.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
If a parent wwants to keep their child to remain a child then they can't turn around and expect them to be ablr to drive a car, select a college, or get a job until they are 20. Children can't drive or go to college. So if parents really want their kids to be children until they are 20, then it should be across the board.
@blion23 (403)
• United States
25 Mar 09
I totally agree with you on this one. You are exactly right. I think that any child over 12 is not considered a child anymore and the dichotomy between real children and teenagers is too large. I think that you are not being too sensitive, teens are much more mature and at 18, kids are considered adults. A six year old is much less mature than say a 17 year old is and even a 14 year old is showing signs of become a man or a women. All in all, I think that the separation and the distinction between the two groups is too broad to call both of them children.
• India
25 Mar 09
I don't think calling anyone from 13-17 as a teen is a way to demean them. Classifying a person as a child, teenager or an adult depends both on the physical age and mental maturity of a person. So if a person of age group 13-17 is not mature enough and acts in a childish way there is no harm in calling them as child. On the other hand you see a lot of British teenagers getting pregnant ...... well for them I think they are quite grown up to be called a child.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Mar 09
Parents will always think of their offspring as their child. i was talking about other adults calling anyone 13-17 a child.
@Ravenladyj (22902)
• United States
6 Apr 09
There is a huge difference between a 6 year old and a 15 year old.What do you think.? HAHA not always!! I have a neice who is almost an adult (18 this yr) and the way she behaves, the choices she makes, general attitude she has is more like she's a 7 or 8 yr old..She's very childish and immature...BUT that said, I get your point.. My feeling is this, it all depends on the individual...My kids are (almost)14 and 15 1/2 and both of them are mature and wise beyond their age group...BUT they had to grow up REALLY fast starting very young.....Regardless of their actual age, they will ALWAYS be my children, my babies...BUT I dont treat them as children...i treat them according to their mentality which is very adult like... All that said, a label is just a label....calling a teen a child is just the way it is and really its such old hat trying to get ppl to change it now would be just nuts..
@Qaeyious (2357)
• United States
25 Mar 09
It depends on how the "target" of the comment is acting. I like the Hobbit community J.R.R. Tolkien devised in the Lord of the Rings - no one is really considered "responsible" until the age of 30. And then again I have seen some 40-year-olds who need a pacifier, and "children" I suspect could hold a responsible job if the law would let them. There have been incidents in my life where some "adult" would start ranting at me when I was a teenager when I didn't do anything wrong. Now that I'm over 50, I can see how an adult might group all young people as inconsiderate sociopaths (and sometimes violent criminals) - but these kinds of incidents I experienced were committed by a small group of misfits. Young people are all around us, it is the most loudest, violent group that gets everyone's attention. It takes me a while when something happens to get my mind to see the real reality, that the problem children are in the minority, no matter what age they are. Or no matter how many sensational media stories of children shooting classmates in their schools.
1 person likes this
@jillhill (37354)
• United States
25 Mar 09
There is a huge difference....and I do think that a teen deserves a little more respectful title.....but some kids at 12 are more mature then those at 17.....so it's a toss up....but young adult seems to be a more proper title!
1 person likes this