Where in the bible does it describe Jesus' physical appearance?

I agree that I don't believe Jesus looked the way they depict Him, but why does it have to be white=pasty regardless all people of all races are God's people I don't think God would like you putting any of His people down.

Being that most of the pictures made of christ are from american painters and america trys to rule all we see what the american eye wants us to see if you look back in the american time our country started from us stealing the land from native americans but you dont see that in our history books then white man enslaved africans to do there work... with that being said he is known to be white now at the same time in the bible it says his hair was white as sheeps wool and that his skin was as bronze dont qoute me on every word but it was along those lines and ues these scriptures were told based off visions but also by the same ppl that walked the earth with them so even though it was a vision i believe it to have been a true statement about his physical and spiritual apperance

"There was no beauty found in him"

"And there was no beauty found in him"

Yes Albert your right... There was a reference in the old testament regarding Jesus Physical Appearance... If you read the history when Jesus was here on Earth in the New Testament. You notice that many people rejected Him as the personal saviour most especially those belong to Pharisees because basically they were expecting that Jesus is Handsome, Tall, comes from a Rich family but not as what they were expecting because of their Lack of knowledge regarding the old testament description of which Jesus is not really good looking to the eye but His Character and deeds portrays that He is the Messiah.

No, I am sorry to say that you are both wrong. The verse in Isaiah is in regards to the crucifixion and/or a metaphorical term to describe that the fact that his message was unappealing. And there is no place in the NT the Jewish rulers reject Jesus because of his physical appearance. I don't know who has told you that, but they're wrong. Jesus' physical appearance does have a commonality in portraits that may trace back to some tradition idea. However, he definitely did not hold the clean cut, anglo-saxon picture often depicted. He would have had a beard, long hair (but probably black, curly, and unwashed). His skin would have been very well baked by the sun. I actually (though I know I am in the minority here) beleive the Shroud of Turin to be the actual burial shroud of Jesus (and before anyone rejects, please update yourself on news of the C-14 dating being reversed). In my estimation, we can look at that and know what Jesus looked like. A good book to read on portrait's of Jesus (physical and non-physical) is Stephen Prothero's "American Jesus" Randy (www.ratiochristi.org)