Rajniti and Praksh Jha.......
By rashmie
@rashmie (947)
United Arab Emirates
March 27, 2009 10:41pm CST
My native place in Bihar and I used to admire Praksh Jha much for obvious reasons....Now all that admiration has shattered, Prakash Jha is in the fray from Betia, he is contesting election on the ticket of LJP....What is the use of making Apharan...when he is going to be with people notorious for crime including kidnapping....Ramvialas with Lalu is a deady pair and they need to defeated so that they can no longer support any more inefficient government like the last five years....and in the Process Prakash Jha must lose this election....
1 person likes this
2 responses
@sanuanu (11235)
• India
29 Mar 09
How about Prakash Jha winning the election and sit with Sadhu Yadav in Parliament. Remember in the movie "Gangajal", there was one character with the same name and there was some controversy on it too. Sadhu Yadav charged Prakash that he has deliberately used his name to make him infamous in India.
It would be interesting seeing both of them's reaction, isn't it?
@rashmie (947)
• United Arab Emirates
29 Mar 09
But I am sorry because I can't wish something like this/...because Prakash Jha is fighting election from Betiah and his opponent is Sadhu Yadav from Congress.....ha ha.....that will be interesting...I wish both of them lost.....I hope you will not react like one who is reacting furiously in other discussion on PM....Good Day....
1 person likes this
@sanuanu (11235)
• India
30 Mar 09
I not the one who respond through PM. If am angry on you then I will show up here.
I don't know exactly which Party Jha is with. Is he with SP? Then it can't happen as both of them are making aliance isn't it? These days things are happening so fast that I can't remember who is with who, don't you get confused?
@AjaySinghBaghel (5506)
• India
10 Jun 10
Do not judge any actor or director by his/her movies. They make movies for money and politics is again such a big business without much investment. Whatever you invest will come back in multiplication.
