There are only two reasons for abortion...
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
March 28, 2009 6:57pm CST
There are two reasons for abortion; when the pregnancy is threatening the life of the mother and when the pregnancy is threatening the confort and convenience of the mother.
The first is a true emergency situation. We who go to school for, and get jobs as medical professionals and techs are trained in "Triage". Triage is the process of deciding which patient needs medical treatment first, which can wait.
In a multi patient situation, medical workers decide which patient had the best chances for survival, then makes decisions accordingly.
In the case of the two patients being the mother and the fetus she is carrying; the mother almost always has the best chances of survival, so of course, her medical needs should be met first.
In all other cases, it is about comfort and convenience for the mother. Nothing more. The mother has no more inherent "right" to kill her offspring just so she doesn't have to bother than any other mother.
It is truly tragic that our society has gotten to the point that we defend the "right" of mothers to kill their offspring. Actually, our society hasn't changed at all. Human beings in general don't seem to mind killing other humans... as long as we can justify it by saying they "aren't really human"...
Abortion is the same mindless bigotry as any other time someone justifies killing using the "not really human" excuse.
Yes, there are legitimate reasons for aborting a fetus, but if it's just because mom doesn't want the baby in her life... it's nothing short of INHUMAN!
3 people like this
16 responses
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Would that mean that you think WAR is wrong too because it involves killing people?
3 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Dittos, miamilady!
Rose, you wrote, "Most people that support abortion always bring in to the conversion (conversation?) war,this is entirely two different subjects,people that die in a war most always enlisted to fight, a war has a meaning and a purpose where taking a life on a innocent peacefully sleeping infant that has no voice is actually unjustifiable murder."
I think you're wrong that "people that die in a war almost always enlisted to fight" and that "a war has a meaning and a purpose"; neither of these are always or even usually true, in my opinion, and this is a topic that is subject to opinion. There are many truly "innocent peacefully sleeping infants" who are killed in wars. People can disagree on the abortion issue and a woman's right to choose and when or if she should have that right but a few weeks old fetus is not an "infant".
Annie
2 people like this
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
29 Mar 09
I didn't see what she typed as a "personal attack" toward you. I also haven't seen many pro-choice believers bring up "war" as you mentioned. Something in the original post made me thing of "war", i'm not sure exactly what it was. Before today I've never really considered comparing abortion with the killing that goes on in war, but now that I have contemplated it, I do think it's something people should think about.
I don't agree with your argument trying to defend the killing that goes on during war. Many of those who are killed in war are too young to even be IN a war.
I've never been one who speaks out against war either, but if we are going to talk about "killing and murder" we might as well be honest about what that really means.
Youre "definition" that you provided us with talks about killing being something that you do with "malice" if that doesn't describe what happens during war, then, I don't know what does.
Abortion is obviously a subject that many people are passionate about. Yes, you ARE entitled to your opinion just as we "gals" are entitled to ours. The reality is, we won't change your mind about this topic nor will you likely change ours.
another topic that pro-choice advocates often bring up, is the fact that there are already far too many "unwanted" children on this earth, and if all those anti-abortion advocates would put there money where their mouths are and adopt those children, the world would be much better off.
3 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Almost 800,000 children are served every year by the foster care system in this country according to the U.S. Children's Bureau, Administration for Children, Youth and Families. Some are reunited with their families, some are adopted and some languish in the system for years. There are far too few families willing to take in these children and, those who do, often find themselves caring for more children than they originally agreed to care for. So, I agree with you. It's so easy to judge while doing nothing.
2 people like this
@Anora_Eldorath (6028)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Ted-
I really uphold and support Roe vs Wade. I hope we never give up that ruling because it would be more dangerous then having protections and procedures. I can recall the stories from women who lived during the era before rulings with back street butchers, as they referred to them-those who performed abortions illegally.
I respect your right to not want to support abortions, but I don't like taking away a person's right to choose and have safe procedures performed.
I also like Miami lady's question. It's a good one.
Namaste-Anora
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Mar 09
First of all Anora_Eldorath, Roe Vs Wade was completely and entirely unconstitutional. Before Roe Vs Wade abortion was left up to the states to decide, which was in accordance with the 10th Amendment. If also completely violated the Preamble.
The Supreme Court, to their shame, completely ignored their Constitutional mandate with Roe Vs. Wade. Support abortion if you must, but please don't celebrate corruption simply because it worked in your favor.
Have you ever wondered how many women are injured during abortions? Do you know why the statistics aren't available? Because the ACLU, Planned Parenthood and other organizations have worked hard to make sure the statistics never see the light of day.
On the other hand, have you ever read any independent statistics about the "back alley abortions"? Nope, all you ever read are "statistics" by the same groups. Their agenda of killing is more important than any truth of facts... or lives.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Actually, I've heard more than two reasons. Some poorer women usually say that they choose abortions because they don't want to subject the child to the life of poverty. Some of them don't want to subject the kid to a hereditary disease.
In these cases, if true, then it's not easy for them. And I daresay that most of them do regret it.
*shrugs* I, mostly, dare not claim to know what goes through people's minds on this issue. Especially the women who choose it. Considering the whole "soul" debate, and the fact of varied beliefs, it's hard for me to say we should rightfully say that they don't have the choice.
We all feel differently about it. I, myself, can't honestly say that all abortions are murder...because, I always get caught up in the question about the soul. Even without intent, people can do awful things, and sometimes...even by accident, people can do the right thing. I won't assume that I have the right to choose for them. Whether it's legal or not, there will always be that choice. It'll be more perilous for everyone involved, but the choice will remain.
So...yeah.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Mar 09
Ok, so Susan Smith and women how dumb their newborns in dumpsters are justified?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
How is it "apples and oranges"? xParanoia say that some women choose abortions because they don't want to subject the child to a life of poeverty or disease. Susan Smith's stated purpose for killing her kids was because she didn't want to subject them to poverty or the evils of the world. Many parents have killed infants or children because of disease of deformity.
Do you really think that everyone with congenital disabilities should never have been born? Go to the Special Olympics and tell all those atheletes how you feel about the fact they exist.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
29 Mar 09
How much more ridiculous are you going to get in this discussion? Apples and oranges, Ted.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
29 Mar 09
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion but when you decide that you have the inherent "right" to judge those whose opinions differ from yours as bigots, your argument becomes null.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
They are related because each were times when "not really human" was used to justify attrocities.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Mar 09
Ah, so slavery wasn't bigoted, because no one has the "right" to judge such things. "Separate but equal" wasn't bigoted, because it was just a difference of opinion... Sure, ok.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
29 Mar 09
Ted, your argument is all over the place. First you say:
"Abortion is the same mindless bigotry as any other time someone justifies killing using the "not really human" excuse."
WHAT other time has someone justified killing WHO/WHAT using the "not really human" excuse except for when the discussion is related to abortion? I really would like to know what you're referring to.
And now you're bringing slavery into it? What the he11 does that have to do with abortion? Yes, people have been bigoted towards many groups throughout history...and they still are...but you're either unable to comprehend my point or you refuse to see it. It IS possible, Ted, to have a discussion without resorting to making generalized judgements about others. When you stoop to doing that, your argument loses it's validity.
Ah, so slavery wasn't bigoted, because no one has the "right" to judge such things. "Separate but equal" wasn't bigoted, because it was just a difference of opinion... Sure, ok.
@rosemarierealino (184)
• Philippines
29 Mar 09
I had an abortion last 2006 because my bag of water burst at my 4months pregnancy. And it's dangerous if I continued because there would some complications to me and the doctor said I would expect any abnormalities to my baby if she'll born. It was really a very sad experience because my husband and I decided to abort our baby girl. She was 4 months and we named her NYSSAH. after 3months of abortion,I got pregnant. So, I learned to be more careful and watchful with my health. I don't want to lose another precious gift. It's another baby girl. Her name is Lemony.
1 person likes this
@la_chique (1498)
•
29 Mar 09
Well done for making the decision as it was in the best interests of both you and the child.
Good luck with baby Lemony. That is a very sweet name :)
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Mar 09
What an inhuman attitude towards another human being. I wonder who else you would justify killing simply for your own bigotry?
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
29 Mar 09
You don't even believe in the exceptions for rape and incest, Ted? Even kennyrose is flexible when it comes to those situations. In my opinion there are as many reasons women may consider having an abortion as there are women who consider it. It's not up to me or YOU to judge those women.
Annie
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Mar 09
Annie, I don't mistreat woman who I know have had abortions... in fact, I have treated many in the ambulance and gave them the best care (both medically and emotionally) I had to offer.
One of my paramedic instructors taught us that "for the time you are with your patient, treat them as if they are the entire reason you became a paramedic in the first place".
Running in places like Milwaukee and Atlanta, you can imagine what percentage of my female patients had had abortions. I asked about them when it was appropriate, and then gave them the emotional and medical support then needed... and none of it was faked.
It's not my place to make sure people who have done things I abhor feel punished by me. However, it is my place to speak out against inhuman and unconstitutional acts. Since abortion is legal, abortion cannot be considered "murder".. but slavery and the holocaust were legal acts too. That didn't make them right.
I'm sure there were many slave owners who were kind and wonderful people... but they justified slavery the same way our society justifies abortion on demand... "they aren't really human".
As for rape (first of all, I don't separate rape and incest... if the victim is underage then it is rape.. period. Incest that isn't rape would only be if both parties are adults).
I see legitimate arguments on both sides there. I would hope that the woman would choose not to punish the child for the crimes of the rapist. What I'd rather see is the rapist pay for his own crimes. But I also can't blame the woman if she can't.
I know this though, while I would never tell a rape victim to have an abortion, but I also can't see myself telling her she has to keep the baby either. Call me weak.
@maximax8 (31046)
• United Kingdom
29 Mar 09
There are websites and books that show diagrams of each week of a baby's development from conception to his or her birth. A lady can find out she is pregnant by week four if she takes a home pregnancy test. I believe the life begins at conception and that a fetus or baby is an innocent one. I am pro-life ans would never have an abortion. I found of that 98% of abortions are done in my home country for social reasons. The other 2% were because the mother's life was in danger or the baby if born would have been severely disabled. I was offered an abortion at 36 weeks pregnancy when the hospital found that my son has spina bifida. I said no way and choose life for him. He had two operations and spent three weeks in a special care baby unit. He is now a happy little 22 month old boy.
I think that an abortion to save the life of a mother is understandable. I know that victims of rape sometimes have an abortion and I would choose adoption in that case. But each of us is different and I feel sorry for a lady that has suffered being attacked. All the ladies that want to abort for their own convenience would be better off going for adoption. Many ladies regret having an abortion and some get depressed years later. A lady might really want her baby but would abort him or her because he or she if born would be disabled to such a degree he or she would have constant pain and suffering. That lady would have a legitimate reason for having an abortion.
@mummyofthree (2715)
•
29 Mar 09
I respect your right to your own opinion.
But my friend it is you who are the bigot here.
There are very few women that enter in to the decision of an abortian without much soul searching. Every woman has the right to make the choice that is best for her. There are many different reasons that I'm sure you can't even begin to comprehend.
Your post is unfair and unnecessary.
But I am guessing you probably know that allready and are after responses to your discussion to boost your earnings!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
Sad to say but millions of abortions are done for nothing more than birth control. Abortion is used instead of birth control every day.
It is bigoted because people justify killing the fetus because they don't consider the fetus human... just as slavery and other horrible decisions have been made against Black people because they weren't considered "really human".
No reason to sugar coat the truth, just because someone might find the truth offensive.
"But I am guessing you probably know that allready and are after responses to your discussion to boost your earnings!"
Whatever you have to tell yourself.
@Lee_Rites (845)
• United States
29 Mar 09
I don't believe that abortion should be used as a form of birth control. I also don't think it is as cut and dry as some people make it.
If the choice of abortion is offered, it will be misused. The simple fact that it is a legal choice will lead some to say that they can use it for whatever purposes they deem necessary.
While I don't condone abortion, it is not for me to tell someone else what they should do. As long as abortion is legal it is up to the woman to decide. Whatever her decision, she will have to live with the consequences whether they be in this life or the next.
@Haimianbaobao (17)
• China
29 Mar 09
To a certain degree, i agree it's a little "inhuman".but things can be complicated.What if the pregancea is an "accident" to the would-be mother? What if the baby won't enjoy love? Besides,women should have the right to choose whether they want the baby or not
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
So it would be ok for a mother to kill a baby she doesn't love?
@la_chique (1498)
•
29 Mar 09
Its a very selfish view to consider only the life of the mother. The most important thing about a pregnancy is the baby.
Therefore I think abortion should be considered:
if the baby would have a life threatening or terminal illness
if the baby would have a condition meaning it would have a very poor quality of life, for example if it were to be born brain damaged
and I think abortion should always be carried out if the child is a result of rape or incest
I also think that people should be forced to have abortions if they are scrounging state benefits and will continue to do so after the baby is born and cant be bothered to work
I think teenage pregnancies in my country should be aborted by depol.
I like China's way of dealing with the number of children within the population. t is very sensible and encourages people to think about their actions.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
I think that considering whether or not to end the life of a fetus a person should ask whether or not they would support ending the life of a neonate for the stated reason.
@Carolinaqt782 (193)
• United States
29 Mar 09
i am pro-life, and we have a lot of the same points-of-view...however, i choose not to push my beliefs on a person. i will give my opinion and if they won't accept it, i stop. i don't resort to attacking them or name calling, as many do to people opposite them( and i have seen this on BOTH sides of the spectrum). it is all about opinion, but i agree that abortion should not be seen as a method of birth control. my belief is once conception takes place, a life has started, and you are not only making a choice for yourself anymore. at that point in time, your body does not just belong to you.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
All I did here was offer my opinion. Thanks for sharing yours.
@MAllen400 (829)
•
29 Mar 09
I disagree. There are two reasons for abortion yes and yes one is when it is threatening the life of the mother but the other is if the faetus is so badly disformed that the quality of life is zero by this I dont mean just a little disabled but major so.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 09
Triage works for those situations too. The mother and the fetus are both patients, and the health and life of both need to be considered.
@GemmaR (8517)
•
29 Mar 09
At the end of the day, if a woman doesn't want a baby, there are methods to prevent her from becoming pregnant.
If she chooses not to put these methods into place, then that is her decision, and therefore her fault if she becomes pregnant.
I do know there are exceptions, but in the majority of cases the choice to terminate a pregnancy is nothing more than plain selfish/careless.
The only reason for abortion should be if either the life of the mother or the baby is in danger, and it is recommended by the doctor. There should be no other reason.
Murder is illegal, so why is killing babies legal?
@jd107nette (1454)
• Philippines
29 Mar 09
hmm...
Well, if it's really threatening for the mother, I guess they have no choice...
The other reason is unacceptable...