Sharia Law

United States
March 29, 2009 12:06pm CST
I'm not a lawyer or law student, but in recent discussions I started reading up on just what Sharia law meant. I came across this entry in Wikipedia which has a great deal of reference material that I'll have to see about finding, but the entry itself is quite detailed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia (Please take the time to read the entire article before responding, there may just be some interesting facts presented) What I find interesting is how much other systems of law were influenced by Medival Sharia law. What do you think of the article at hand? Do you find it interesting as well that some of the early systems were influenced by the Islamic Golden Age?
4 people like this
4 responses
@sandal13 (142)
• India
30 Mar 09
well, i could not stop myself in posting my opinion ! actually it does not make any sense to fight over 'shari law' All those who think that if sharia law is completely followed womean will be finished should actually read the 'The Qoran' .Islam came in a period when a girl used to be buried alive when she was born!and it was the first law which spoke out women rights, that the day a girl is born she has the right on the property of her father, the day she is married she owes "mehar" ( a gift in the form of property or cash) from her husband . islam talks about dressing modestly , it considers women as precious n priceless just like any priceless or precious stone. u tell me if u have precious diamond what will u do? would u keep it safely? would u flaunt it? or would u sell it? offcourse u will keep it safely now thats how women are considered in islam and they r told to dress modestly . Now, sharia law is definately made keeping all human aspects n society in mind .The only problem which has been with it is its execution and the people who r supposed to execute it" I dont blame anyone who has a wrong picture of this law instead i blame those who claim to be the sole proprietor for executing this law i am refering to the "priest class" in islam ! i blame them to mispresent the whole picture . to degrading the level of muslim women and completely going against sharia. I tell u a short incident from the islamic history . As we know there have been many messngers of god n prophets on earth like jesus,mohammed,noah ,moses etc. one such messenger was yaqub (p.b.u.h) he was searching for his yongest son as he was missing and he enquired about his son to an animal (he had a special power to communicate with animals n birds) u know what they relied? they said "we have not seen your son , and god forbid if we lie we must become as terrible as the 'mullahs' of the 21st centuary". can u believ this ? this was written almost 1500 years ago ! imagine what these "priest class ' of every religion has done ! Actually the priest class of every religion is responsible for the differences in the society!they have always misguided the common man ALWAYS! Allah says in qoran to us that " i have sent u in different tribes and areas just because all of you recognise each other and also recognoise what is common between you all " never the less we all belong to the family of man and we all pray to that one allmighty . i hope he listens to opur prayer and make everyone believ that we all are one.
5 people like this
• United States
30 Mar 09
Sandal- Thank you for sharing so openly. I have to agree with all priests/figureheads have ruined more pure religions then not. It seems that even if a God comes to earth directly and gives people the word, that the word is always filtered through human logic, and thus misunderstood. There are many who even believe that the teachings of the Buddha (who was also a real man) have been filtered through the years and that todays Buddhism looks nothing like the original. It's sad that women have had to fight for rights, or had their rights taken away. We cannot deny that even in the United States women had no rights until the last 1920's. We are just as guilty. And to say that only one religion is guilty of having wife beaters, well that's just a lie. It's human nature we should be looking at, indeed. Thank you again for sharing. Namaste-Anora
3 people like this
@sandal13 (142)
• India
30 Mar 09
hi anora, thank u very much for ur feedbck and i thank u in return for bringing up this issue, i feel glad that there r still some people like u who do research on topics which r the burning issue in the society. I must say u r a responsible citizen and an inspiration to me. people should learn from u.
5 people like this
@kevdiesel (129)
• Kenya
30 Mar 09
Well well.. Well done, nice article u got there and i must say am impressed.
5 people like this
• United States
30 Mar 09
Thanks. It's definately an interesting read. As I said before I still need to cross reference some of the works as it will make for even more learning. I'm defiantely interested in seeing the progression, and what the laws actually say from unbiased sources, rather then on some of the articles written from a particular agenda. Namaste-Anora
3 people like this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
20 May 09
I think it is interesting that when you study different legal codes you will find many similarities. One article I read showed where the 10 commandants could be found in many different societies in a different form. There seems to be some Universal concepts of right and wrong. What happens is when you have people interpreting the law to fit their needs or political/religious beliefs. In the US now we are having a debate over what torture is and what is included and not included. In what seems should be a simple debate you find you find a wide range of opinions.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 May 09
Bob- Thanks for responding. You bring up a good point that there will always be multiple views on issues. And yes, there does seem to be a Universal Code of Ethics, and if we all could come to that understanding just think of how far we'd get as humanity, right? I know about the debates going on over torture, and I'm still shocked to listen to old reports of Rice stating she thought the President was just doing what was right. When is torture ever right or ever justified? The entire debate really gets under my skin. Thank you so much for responding. Namaste-Anora
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
29 Mar 09
I find it disgusting, no government should ever be run by any "religion". The following is one chapter of Islam 101: http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/islam-101.html Unlike many religions, Islam includes a mandatory and highly specific legal and political plan for society called Sharia, which translates approximately as "way" or "path." The precepts of Sharia are derived from the commandments of the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and precedents of Muhammad as found in the reliable hadiths and the Sira). Together, the Quran and the Sunnah establish the dictates of Sharia, which is the blueprint for the good Islamic society. Because Sharia originates with the Quran and the Sunnah, it is not optional. Sharia is the legal code ordained by Allah for all mankind. To violate Sharia or not to accept its authority is to commit rebellion against Allah, which Allah's faithful are required to combat. There is no separation between the religious and the political in Islam; rather Islam and Sharia constitute a comprehensive means of ordering society at every level. While it is in theory possible for an Islamic society to have different outward forms — an elective system of government, a hereditary monarchy, etc. — whatever the outward structure of the government, Sharia is the prescribed content. It is this fact that puts Sharia into conflict with forms of government based on anything other than the Quran and the Sunnah. The precepts of Sharia may be divided into two parts: 1. Acts of worship (al-ibadat), which includes: Ritual Purification (Wudu) Prayers (Salah) Fasts (Sawm and Ramadan) Charity (Zakat) Pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj) 2. Human interaction (al-muamalat), which includes: Financial transactions Endowments Laws of inheritance Marriage, divorce, and child care Food and drink (including ritual slaughtering and hunting) Penal punishments War and peace Judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence) As one may see, there are few aspects of life that Sharia does not specifically govern. Everything from washing one's hands to child-rearing to taxation to military policy fall under its dictates. Because Sharia is derivate of the Quran and the Sunnah, it affords some room for interpretation. But upon examination of the Islamic sources, it is apparent that any meaningful application of Sharia is going to look very different from anything resembling a free or open society in the Western sense. The stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions, and a mandatory hostility toward non-Islamic nations punctuated by regular warfare will be the norm. It seems fair then to classify Islam and its Sharia code as a form of totalitarianism. http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/sharia-law.html
2 people like this
• United States
30 Mar 09
Prarie- Thank you for your thoughtful and passionate response, but don't you find it interesting that our own form of government in the United States in part was influenced by Sharia Law? That I wasn't aware of until I did some research and looking at the progression of Medivial law, and knowing our progression I find it all very fascinating. And there have been incidents of the "Church" running the country. Just look back at history. Even early American's were ruled by the Puritan Church. I'm glad for evolution to be honest, but even today we still find evidence of Puritanical law in the workings. How many people today still walk around calling America a "Christian government"? That said, I think you bring up wonderful points. We must all do our best, to fight against Totaliarianism in any fashion and in any country. Thank you again for bringing points to the discussion. Namaste-Anora
3 people like this
• United States
30 Mar 09
Thank you for your thoughtful and passionate response, but don't you find it interesting that our own form of government in the United States in part was influenced by Sharia Law? That I wasn't aware of until I did some research and looking at the progression of Medivial law, and knowing our progression I find it all very fascinating. And there have been incidents of the "Church" running the country. Just look back at history. Even early American's were ruled by the Puritan Church. I'm glad for evolution to be honest, but even today we still find evidence of Puritanical law in the workings. How many people today still walk around calling America a "Christian government"? That said, I think you bring up wonderful points. We must all do our best, to fight against Totaliarianism in any fashion and in any country. Thank you again for bringing points to the discussion. Namaste-Anora I'm sorry but our government wasn't influenced by Sharia Law. From a Muslims site. Shariah verses US Constitution No Comparison http://www.iol.ie/~afifi/BICNews/AbuTalut/AbuTalut4.htm They aren't even computable. http://citizensagainstsharia.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/islamic-law-and-the-constitution-are-they-compatible/ Thomas Jefferson warned us about the ideology of Islam.
2 people like this
• United States
30 Mar 09
So, you don't think that the scholars who have compared them, done their historical studies are correct? May I ask if you are a historian? And regarding America, you said nothing. Why is that? Do you not feel we've made our share of mistakes? We had Puritanical law that was atrocious. We completely ignored the Iroquois constitution, spitting on it as we slaughtered Native Americans, and for the last oh I don't know how long the Conservative Christian organizations have been yelling that the United States was founded on Christianity and is a Christian nation. The last I read by the fonding fathers they despised Christianity, including Thomas Jefferson who warned against it. http://freethought.mbdojo.com/foundingfathers.html I was trying to agree with you that all forms of Totalitarianism, including those found in America should not be tolerated. Namaste-Anora
3 people like this