Which is better Triond or Associated Content?
By rashmie
@rashmie (947)
United Arab Emirates
March 29, 2009 7:55pm CST
Triond and Associated Content are websites which allow freelance writers to get published. Both of them pays writer according to page views. However, the payment per page view is variable. Triond pays more, but Associated Content seems to be more popular. Which one should be selected by a freelance writer who has just started his career? I have written some articles for Triond….
4 responses
@aidenofthetower (1814)
• United States
19 Aug 09
I would have to say that it depends on where you live, the languages you can write, and your long term goals. Associated Content is best for US writers who want money now and aren't real concerned with making a long term residual income. This is because their long term residual income amounts really stink. Plus they don't pay non-US writers.
On the other hand Triond is very friendly to people around the world. They even let you publish in more then one language, which can make it a great resource for those who are bi-lingual or who struggle to write in English. The money there isn't great, but it is residual and if you have a lot of writing up it could be a significant amount.
@rashmie (947)
• United Arab Emirates
20 Aug 09
I fully subscribe with your views....Both of these platform is great and have their own advantages. My experience of three month says that AC is better since it allow me to republish its article on my blog and then you don't need to be active there to get page views. However, the way triond publishes article on different website is awesome. I will keep writing for both....Thanks for your nice response...
@cvrajan (354)
• India
31 Mar 09
Rashmi,
I wrote in Triond and I keep writing in Helium, AC, S101 and Howtodothings. Each site has some advantages and disadvantages. Again it is very difficult to predict your earnings based on page views.
In Triond, they want your so-far-unpublished articles. Fine. What I found painful there was that our submission is (I guess) is read by a software first (that looks for some spelling/ grammar errors, sentence lengths etc) and the first scutiny is made. I got a couple of illogical rejections (even after I wrote some 7 or 8 articles there) and I had to resubmit them to get them reviewed by an editor. I felt bored.
I found initially my earnings to be reasonable, but later on they tapered off drastically.
In AC, the advantage is, you can post non-exclusive articles for Performance Payment only. Hence, I write in Helium and also re-post some of those articles in AC. The traffic in AC appears to be more steady to me, in comparison with Triond. Others may have a different opinion.
@sweetseoul (732)
• Philippines
23 Apr 09
hello! i just joined bukisa but i want to publish all my articles too in associated content.
it's okay right? as long as i choose the "display only" option -- performance payment only?
thanks!
@NuttyMomma (901)
• United States
19 Apr 09
I started on ehow just because I was looking to build my confidence. I don't care what anyone says, the money there is awful. I write for the love of writing on specific topics and it took me a while to realize that unless you searched the search engines and keywords you weren't going to do well writing there. plus they are not a very professional site. I have articles on Bukisa, Helium and Associated Content. I like AC and helium very much, they are more professional. Currently I still feel like I am not making money that I would like to but I am still learning. I only started in January. I have looked into Triond and I am going to devote a day to really seeing how it works. I think the more you write, the better you get. Paying attention to the forums that these different sites have also gives you a lot of tips and really is a window into how professional and writer friendly they are. Just because a site accepts your work doesn't mean that it is a site that you want to be involved in. I learned that lesson. Popular isn't always a good thing.