Marry Who You Want?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
11 responses
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
18 May 09
Any two consenting adults should be allowed to marry and get all the benefits and responsibilities of marraige. Historically, marraige was attained when mom and dad "sold" the bride to the grooms family for whatever dowry they could afford. If the groom decided that he needed an heir that the wife could not provide, he was able to take another wife, provided the dowry was reasonable. These days, most everyone has the right to choose who they want to marry. I don't necessarily believe that you should be able to marry who you want, because that could include, children, forced brides, even animals. The only restriction for legal recognition of marraige should be consenting adults. And this is strictly to prevent abuse of a person.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
True, the whole concept of choice at all is relatively new. But when State Supreme Courts are even using the argument that its unconsitutional to keep people from marrying who they want, I think it's time to challenge it.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 May 09
Not necessary, that's true.. and I seriously doubt they meant to make it include "all"... but they did use the word and didn't restrict it to adults only.
1 person likes this
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
19 May 09
The only thing that I can think of right now is the minors shouldn't be allowed to Mary. Other than that, I think I'm okay with just about anything. I tend to be a "to each his own" type of person.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 May 09
So you want your line to be repected, do you respect where others draw that same line?
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
Not only didn't they define the word, they didn't even make it part of the ruling. They simply made marriage a basic human right for all Californians.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
True, but it (and variations of it) seem to be used a lot in discussions about marriage.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
Thanks!
It may seem like a strange topic of discussion. I've noticed that a lot of people say that people should be able to marry who they want, but when they challenged on it, they almost always come up with restrictions or exceptions.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
So you don't advocate "marry who you want", you want restrictions on it?
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
18 May 09
Well, I definitly think that because of our free will we should be able to decide whether or not we want to marry a certain person. I don't think any restrictions should be placed on marriage... but that doesn't mean that marriage shouldn't have a specific definition.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
Really? So a person who is already married can marry someone else without first getting a divorce? How many people should be able to be involved in a marriage? 2, 5, 50?
Should there be any age limits, or limits on age differences between the people getting married?
"but that doesn't mean that marriage shouldn't have a specific definition."
How can it have a specific definition without defining who can and can't participate?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 May 09
Thanks... but I do have a question... you say you have no right to force your ideas of marriage on others.. but you do seem to be willing to enforce the "two" and "adult" part.
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
19 May 09
My point is that everyone has a right to marry. I think by definition marriage is between two-not three- consenting adults. I furthermore believe it must be between a man and a woman, however, that's my own Personal belief and others disagree. I won't restrict any two consenting adults from marrying.
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
18 May 09
Since this discussion seems to mostly be about the california law, I think they need to add a clause protecting sheep and goats and dogs and horses. This is california you're discussing mostly after all. It would be nice if they at least protected the defensless creatures that lived there, from the human pervs that live there. They seem to be "bent" on marrying just about anything out there.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
No, it's mostly about what restrictions people would put on the concept of "marry who you want". Which I think is a disengenous argument because almost everyone has restrictions they would put on it.
But more specifically to California, it does scare me that the State Supreme Court never mentioned age or the word adult in their decision. They simply stated that forming a family is a basic human right open to all Californians.
1 person likes this
@kukaisiton (702)
• Philippines
18 May 09
Hi parated2k, here in the philippines, we're pretty much able to marry anyone we please. Most of the time, the only restrictions we have are the restrictions or standards we put on ourselves. Like for example, I would like to marry someone who has the same religion as mine. Or sometimes we restrict ourselves through our standards. But here i think, marriage is between a man and a woman only.
anyway, i dont think there should be any societal restrictions on marriage. it should always be based on free will. as long as you dont step on any morals, you should be able to marry anyone you want.
http://kcatwoman.blogspot.com
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 May 09
Really? So a person who is already married can marry someone else without first getting a divorce? How many people should be able to be involved in a marriage? 2, 5, 50?
Should there be any age limits, or limits on age differences between the people getting married?
@kukaisiton (702)
• Philippines
18 May 09
i wrote on my response that as long as we dont step on any morals then it's fine. of course the usual is that you must be at least 18 to marry. You can never be bigamous bec. (common sense) that's not moral. And there's also no divorce here but annulment.
Im just saying that there are no restrictions like some of the chinese or other races where the parents are the ones who choose for them. Those were the restricitions i was thinking you were asking. well, im glad to clear it up.
have a nice day!
@technoobs (406)
• Philippines
19 May 09
Marriage is another step in life,relatively having a bigger responsibility.
However, consequences to being married whoever they want may not be a good point since you don't even know each other better. Being into a married life might be no return but to continue having someone to be with in resolving everything in life. As it was said that you become as one, that is I know a line to be spoken before two person getting married by the priest, would mean together as you go on.
So getting married whoever you want? Should have to think over and over not twice but many times till you come up with your answers.