Constitution 101...installment #1. "seperation of church and state
By xfahctor
@xfahctor (14118)
Lancaster, New Hampshire
May 19, 2009 10:10pm CST
I decided to start this because of a few discussions that quoted the "seperation of church and state". There seems to be some confusion in this and I thought it should be cleared up. The term "seperation of church and state" actually stems from a letter from Thomas Jefferson to Bishop James Madison.
The actual text from the constitution is worded as follows: [i]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
[/i] Often called the "Establishment clause" the portion of it mentioning religion dictates that congress shall not mandate a particular religion .establish an official national religion, nor may it create laws that prohibit the free exercise of one's religion.
Though many of the founders weren't what we in the modern world call "true christians" they all held a belief in "God" or a god and had deep faith and belief. This is evident through out history, documents and letters of the founders. Though they did not wish to have an established religion, they were people of deep faith and this faith guided their every move. the whole premise of our constitutiona dn declaration of independence is that our rights are granted to us by our creator...our "God" and not by our government, because our rights are something that are simply beyond the command of mere man and government.
6 people like this
12 responses
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
20 May 09
I find it interesting that a student (in Public Schools - Government Schools) can be sent home for wearing a necklace of a Cross or Star of David yet we are told by the same courts that we can not prevent a girl from wearing a head dress in school. We must be tolerant of others faiths. We teach environmentalism which is worshiping of the Earth and nature. Public Schools teach evolution but not Creationisms. they teach the the Gay and Lesbian life style is morally right. In reality the wall of separation that has been imposed is not what the founding fathers had in mind.
I agree that more people should read the constitution, they would be surprised how the government is destroying their rights.
2 people like this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
26 May 09
I find it interesting that it is rarely the Christians who are filing protest over others beliefs but are the victim of the attacks. I have seen displays for Ramadan, Kwanzaa, and Hanukkah, without my Christian friends say anything about it. They do get upset at a news story that talks about the Holiday season with out mentioning Christmas but then does a feature on Ramadan or Kwanzaa. My granddaughter came and told me about Kwanzaa and how they had learned about it in school, yet they could not have a Christmas Program, because some one might be offended. In a world History course my daughter learned about the Major faiths of the world and the text book only had a paragraph on Christianity (mainly the Spanish Inquisition) while the other religions had a sub chapter on them. She learned about socialism, Communism, and Monarchies but all she learned about Capitalism was the Robber Barons. We need to be teaching our children about our country and what made it great.
1 person likes this
@grammasnook (1871)
• United States
20 May 09
Never ever have I heard of a child being sent home from a public school for wearing a necklace or anything that displays their religious beliefs. If this has happened where you live then I would be furious. All applies to all faiths where I live it is about each faith respecting another not one being better than another. It all boils down to everyone believes in a high authority than the human race.
I refuse to stop saying Merry Christmas or I would like to buy a Christmas tree. Just recently I said to my husband I am going to start selling kwansa trees. Nothing more than a pine tree with a new name. If you are of that faith you buy it if not go down the road and buy a Christmas tree, a little further maybe another type of tree. Name them as you want but I will not allow my rights to be trampled on.
I also do not believe that the schools teach that gay and lesbian lifestyle is morally right they explain how people are different and do not teach hatred. They talk about both creationism and evolution and they do not go deep into either one of them. As for the environmentalism as you call it that is not a faith but indeed a concern of many americans that carry different faiths.
I speak for my childrens publics schools which I have been involved in now for 26 years. I can not speak of others around the states.
@grammasnook (1871)
• United States
20 May 09
An environmentalist is a person who may advocate the sustainable management of resources and stewardship of the natural environment through changes in public policy or individual behavior. In various ways (for example, grassroots activism and protests), environmentalists and environmental organizations seek to give the natural world a stronger voice in human affairs.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
20 May 09
Thank you for posting this, x. It does come up from time to time and I hate looking like a nag when I correct someone's misconceptions about this issue. Our founding fathers considered a lot of things when drafting the Constitution and keeping our religious beliefs safe from government interference was one of them. Their intention was not to keep our faith in God out of the government...just to keep government from regulating our faith.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 May 09
"Their intention was not to keep our faith in God out of the government...just to keep government from regulating our faith"
wow, I don't think I have ever seen it worded so comprehensively, thank you for that spally, you rok!
4 people like this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
20 May 09
It is amazing how many interpret that to mean that there shall be no mention of Christianity in public life. They seem to forget that secularism is also a religion as is also atheism, which is what was the prevailing belief in Communist countries. Yet they do not apply the same restriction to Islam, Paganism, Buddhism, and to a lesser extent to Judiaism. So they will not let public officials use In Jesus's name, or even pastors pray for the troops mentioning HIS name, because they think separation of church and state means no church or no mention of God with reference to HIS son.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
20 May 09
I am not against religion in public life. In fact I am all for freedom of religion. But it hurts me, being a singer, when I hear that in some Malls they cannot even sing Christmas Carols. So do not think that I am against religion in public life because I am not. I am referring to others. It hurts me when I read that because of political correctness they call an Easter Concert a Spring Concert, and a Christmas Concert a Winter Festival. I do not want that the only time you want to hear Hark the Herald Angels Sing or Christ the Lord is Risen Today is when you go to a Christian School.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 May 09
You guys aren't so hung up on keeping religion out of public view up there, at least that was my experience in my time up there. Some people here seem to have almost a rabid reaction to even the mention of god in public. It is indeed sad when kindergarden class has to rename a christmas play to a "holidat play" or a "winter play" to avoid offending one or two people.
3 people like this
@Rollo1 (16679)
• Boston, Massachusetts
20 May 09
As many of the original colonists came to this land to seek religious freedom, it was on the minds of the framers of the Constitution to avoid any national religion and to allow free practice of religion to all citizens. The rights of the citizens did not include protecting them from anyone mentioning religion. Free speech is supposed to cover that.
Unfortunately, as you point out, many people consider this the "separation of church and state" clause. Of course, the entire point of this amendment was to protect the church from the state, not the other way around. The other day there was a story about angry parents, who complained when they found out someone had given their kids a free bible on school grounds. I wonder if they would have been so angry if it had been some other book with a religious theme.
The only religion that people seem to want separated from public life, is Christianity. Other beliefs seem to take on entire sets of rights. If my children can sing a Kwanzaa song and a Hannukah song in the school winter concert (not allowed to call it Christmas) then why is Silent Night banned? I don't have any problem with them singing the other songs, I only have a problem when my religion is the only one that is considered offensive enough to be erased from the holiday that celebrates its beginning.
@PrarieStyle (2486)
• United States
20 May 09
Thank you for posting this. I think we should have a lot more topics on our constitution. We should know it well.
It's the only thing that can save America. America is about the last free nation left on Earth.
Let freedom ring!
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 May 09
I hope to post more of these. People seem averse to actualy reading the constituion. either out of intimidation or apathy, so, to borrow a religious phrase, if you can't get Mohamehd to the mountain, then you bring the mountain to Mohamehd.
3 people like this
@MrPKitty (102)
• United States
21 May 09
One question, is it that the founding fathers are not what the modern world would call "true Christians" or could it be that the Christians of today are not what the founding fathers would have called "True Christians?"
After all, the beliefs they held then are not quite the same as the ones expounded today.
@thedogshrink (1266)
• United States
21 May 09
Could you give a bit of detail as to what beliefs are different? I'd love to answer but I don't want to mistake your meaning.
@thedogshrink (1266)
• United States
21 May 09
I'm sorry, like I said I really wanted to answer your question, but I have even less idea what you're talking about now than I did before! We dumped Christmas when we declared our independence?? In what universe? Separation of the sexes??
What are you talking about? Are you in the US?
@MrPKitty (102)
• United States
21 May 09
When we finally declared our independence one of the first things we dumped was Christmas. We considered it a custom of England and not wanting anything to do with England, it was out the door. No celebration, no special masses, just another day of the week.
And then there's the church taxes, when the Sabbath starts and what can be done on it and separation of the sexes and so on.
@justinus (1104)
• Karawaci, Indonesia
20 May 09
In my country, there are still debate about secular or religious state among leaders, menas that the religious group leaders aspireing that any rules and regulations based on religions teaching (Islam) while the other group commited to apply constitution as the basic of any rules and regulation for citizens at general, for instances is that order to pray 5 times a day for moslem doesnt regulate by state but by their internal own group means that the state has no right to take sanction to people who do not pray. The only religion's rule which is applied only marriage especially at moslem populated region, that the state will only allow a bridge as legal if they were married at mosque for moslem and at church for chritian, there will not allow mix religion marriage. The only region whic allow their people married in mix religions is only Bali, because the most of them are Hinduism
@spicysweetie21 (2573)
• United States
20 May 09
First of all I am thinking that you are referring to some of my discussions in which i say that, and i will once again point out that many many people word that clause as separation of church and state, and i will point out that i have never ever said that a person shouldn't voice their love of god or religion, all i said was that government/politics and religion should not be mixed together, i myself have never seen anyone else who stated "separation of church and state" saying anything like that either, and people who quote it aren't making things up because Jefferson was the one who came up with the first amendment aka "bill of rights", and thus since he was the one who said the term "separation of church and state" immediately after stating the clause thats in the first amendment means that people who say that term are not just talking out of their butt because Jefferson came up with it and thats the way he worded, Madison wrote the amendments so he was the one who got the final wording, but it was Jefferson's idea and thats the way the original idea was worded....don't attack or say someone is wrong just because they believe the same principle but they just word it different
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
20 May 09
I think you may have taken this a little personaly. It was not directed at you specificly, this has come up many times before with others as well over a long period of time, so don't take it to heart, ok? it wasn't an attack at all. :)
I do need to correct a typo of mine though, the letter was to the Danbury Baptist association association, I had pasted some other text as reference and missed some when deleting it. Here is a copy of Jefferson's Letter:
[i]
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem & approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful & zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more & more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state. [Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from presenting even occasional performances of devotion presented indeed legally where an Executive is the legal head of a national church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves and your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.
(signed) Thomas Jefferson
Jan.1.1802.
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
27 Jan 12
Huge difference between freedom of religion (which we have) and free from religion (which people always try to push). Some people are drama queens they aren't happy unless they can mess everyone's else happiness up also.
@miamilady (4910)
• United States
30 Sep 09
I'd like to see that letter, for the sake of curiosity...
I'm sorry I didn't see this discussion when you first posted it.
So...what can we apply this information to as far as political arguments go?
@thedogshrink (1266)
• United States
20 May 09
Here's an excerpt from my post on another thread:
It is the religious foundations of this country that gave us the rights and freedoms we have -- and the so called, misnamed, separation of church and state. Our Constitution NEVER stated there was a separation of church and state. It is BETTER than that. It simply states that government cannot make any law regarding practicing of religion. Hmmmm.... seems we have already crossed that line.
Our founding fathers were all deeply spiritual men. They weren't all Christians, but not a one of them ever objected to public prayer before or during any event, including their meetings on the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, and the rest -- they began every meeting with prayer, asking for Divine guidance on their meeting. There was one time I remember reading about when there was much anger and inability to have a meeting of the minds, and I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who stood up and suggested to remedy the situation, they should take a break and pray.
They did. And the rest as they say, is history.
And to Spicysweetie:
As you can see from the letter that X posted, Jefferson was a man who chose his words carefully and knew full well the tiny nuances of each word. If he intended separation of church and state in the way people are using it today, he would have made that very clear. Instead what is made clear in both the Constitution, AND this letter from Jefferson, is that he was concerned about the government making rules and regulations about religion, NOT about public prayer or other public displays of religion (PDR? lol I guess you establishing/had to be in the military ...). Indeed, he and the others who made our Constitution regularly participated in public prayer, and publicly beseeching God. And they did not all have the exact same beliefs, which was the whole point. We are not supposed to be forced to hide our beliefs, change them, or adhere to the state's belief. So yeah, even tho Jefferson one time in a particular spot mentioned a wall of separation, that does NOT translate to saying that when people say it today they are only copying him, and following his intent. They are twisting his intent into something that more and more resembles exactly what he was trying to PREVENT.e
@CODYMAC (1356)
• San Diego, California
21 Jan 12
Thank you, xfahctor. I am in complete agreement with you in that we as a nation have taken so many things out of context when it comes to the constitution. We think of ourselves as free when we have enslaved ourselves with laws that do not exist. As you stated, the men who created the constitution may not have all been "christian" but they had their faith all were created equal. All were given rights that no man is able to ever give, and no man can never take away. As simple a thing as this is, many people have a hard time with the rights of man. The way things are remind me of a book... 1984. Yes, it is the way it is for the "betterment" of the people. How sad this "betterment" is. I hope people wake up from their slumber and really read the constitution. I love the free pamphlet called the "Citizens Rule Book". AWSOME and sooo informative. Thank you again for your true voice. Have a great day. :) :)