Is Someone's Race And Gender A Reason To Appoint Someone?
By gewcew23
@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
May 26, 2009 12:30pm CST
Let us just be honest for just a minute, the only reason that Sonia Sotomayor has been appointed is because she is a female Hispanic. Obama wanted to appoint the first Hispanic, and while at that the appointment would be better if the Hispanic is a women. Ms. Sotomayor fits all of that, yet does not anything else matters?
1 person likes this
6 responses
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
26 May 09
People should be appointed because of their qualifications. Not because of gender, race, etc...
But try telling our elected officials that.
2 people like this
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
27 May 09
From all I've heard about her she isn't qualified.
This statement alone should disqualify her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug-qUvI6WFo
1 person likes this
@cuttyrish (2667)
• United States
26 May 09
maybe they share the same political conviction, and she is an activist judge.....race and gender is not a reasonable reason just to appoint someone, it's discriminatory.. they should be qualified for the position they are being appointed to. The president should always settle for the best if there is one that is much better than her..
1 person likes this
@TenishaToday (20)
• United States
26 May 09
I think that your call for honesty should encompass all history and not just this particular moment in history. Politics is always a game of showmanship and often times individuals are nominated not because they are the "best" candidate (that is often quite subjective anyway), but because they fit some sort of " ideal mold" that the current in group needs to bolster support for their position, cause, or platform.