911
By tnsteeler14
@tnsteeler14 (42)
United States
May 30, 2009 10:59pm CST
does anybody here think that 911 was a conspiracy or not? i personally think that it was because in some videos at the pentagon on it shows a "light" come out of the bottom of the airplane and then it hits, and if the so-called commercial airplanes were hi-jacked they would have been some of the smallest commercial airplanes, because the regular airplanes were bigger than the hole in the pentagon. If you look closely in some of the videos of the pentagon then you will see that the papers, desks, computers, and walls would have burned from the jet fuel igniting, and in the twin towers when they were about to fall there were "puffs" of smoke in lower levels of the buildings. Therefore it was a conspiracy to me...
1 response
@tnsteeler14 (42)
• United States
31 May 09
1.the "puffs" wouldnt be about 15 to 20 stories below the the collapsing parts of the building
2.the hole in the pentagon was smaller than the regular size of the commercial airplane, now explain to me how a big airplane could make a small hole in the pentagon
@uath13 (8192)
• United States
31 May 09
1. Yes they would. The towers were big hollow tubes basically. If you blow in one end of a tube you'd see or feel a reaction at the other end wouldn't you?
2. An airplane is hollow. A well reinforced building could withstand an impact & the plane would crumple. The towers only fell because of the heat that weakened the substructure. The pentagon didn't have those kinds of stresses.
@tnsteeler14 (42)
• United States
31 May 09
but tell me how the jet fuel from the airplane wouldnt burn the papers desks walls and everything else near the crash site. the jet fuel would have burned all of those things
