We came from APES, do you agree with that?

I don't agree with that... However, i do ever join a discussion like this before in Christian topics or GOD, or maybe Religion (i forgot which one is it). Anyway, there was a reply that saying like this; "If those APES where evolute into humans, so there would be no APES now".. That's quite a logic clarification i think.

Charles Darwin never said anything about Apes becoming man through evolution. What he said was, life came from multiple instances of natural selection, and that in nature only the strong and those who can adapt to change can survive. And that life didn't materialize in a spontaneous act of creation also. Man evolved from a species of prehistoric man, which can be made comparable to an ape like appearance but nevertheless it is still of human species. Right now humans are still evolving kids of our generation are developing more faster brains. Little by little we do eveolve. It is a never ending process. And as for your picture...

Charles Darwin did not say that we came from apes. What he said is that humans and the many kinds of apes today appear to have a common ancestor - a creature with ape-like characteristics from whom, over time, different individuals arose, becoming more specialised and adapted to their environment from one generation to the next. People point to the fact that there are still apes in the world as evidence that we aren't apes but, in fact, this is the main evidence that we are 'apes' (or, rather, descended from a common stock). On a larger scale, both apes and humans are mammals which, in turn, became differentiated from reptiles and birds many billions of years ago. Each branch of the tree slowly gained different characteristics through changes in the code that is common to all life on Earth - DNA. It is this code which is the true miracle of creation and, because it is still dynamic and changing as it always has been, the reason why Creation is not an event in the past but something that is actively happening all the time, even in humans. The fact is that our lives and even our written history are far too brief and our normal perception rather too coarse to observe this process. It is only the quite new science of microbiology which can prove conclusively that it is. Darwin first observed that there were different but related species of certain birds and other animals on various Pacific islands and concluded (with the help of older theories which people seem to have forgotten about) that these species must originally have come from just a few individuals which had, by accident, landed and settled on these islands. This prompted him to write 'On the Origin of Species' (in which the word 'evolution' is never mentioned, by the way) and, later, the 'Descent of Man', which is the book that caused so much controversy. The apes that exist in the world today do not 'evolve into humans' because they are apes and they have followed a different path to ours. There is actually surprisingly little that sets us apart from apes and other mammals. We have evolved a larger and more complicated brain than the other apes; we have developed vocal language and there are differences in our manual dexterity but all of this can be shown to have happened during the last few millions of years, which is but the blink of an eye in the history of the earth. Looking at your picture, I would say that you are a very attractive 'ape' because you are female and a member of my own species. A gorilla or an orang-utan may not have quite the same perception! You are smiling, though, which both humans and apes do as a sign of pleasure and willingness to be friendly. The Bible was first written down long after the stories in it had been passed on from generation to generation as a verbal tradition of the history of a small nomadic Middle Eastern tribe and of myths and rationalisations of how the world and the human race in particular came into being. The Creation myths, themselves, can be shown to be adaptations of earlier myths which are far older than the relatively recent belief in one supreme God who alone should be worshipped. This in no way invalidates the wisdom contained in the Bible. It merely puts a different (and more reasonable) emphasis on what is the truth (and what is not). It is not so much that the Bible contains untruths: it is merely that the truths it holds are contained in parables, metaphors and figurative language which many people today, brought up in the atmosphere of factual rather than poetic truth, have completely failed to understand.

I don't think that theory is true. It wasn't proven until today. The monkeys in the zoo are still there and all the animals seems never evolve in the jungle. I think Darwin's theory is basically a scrap and no basis at all. If it takes millions or thousands of years to evolve then as of today it must take effect because science claims that earth was around 3.5 billion years old. So whats the story morning glory?