China recently banned ownership of all large dogs and limited each family...

@sbeauty (5865)
United States
November 12, 2006 10:01am CST
...to owning only one dog. What do you think?
3 people like this
17 responses
@rusty2rusty (6763)
• Defiance, Ohio
13 Nov 06
Does anyone know if they have spay or neutering laws in China? If not,they should.
2 people like this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
2 Dec 06
I agree. That would make a lot of difference down the road. Unfortunately, they have to deal with the reality of now. It's so sad! Thanks for responding.
1 person likes this
@Jellen (1852)
• United States
13 Nov 06
If I lived in China, I would follow the rules. For that matter, if I lived anywhere, one large dog would be more than enough for me. But folks who farm or raise livestock need guard dogs for protection of herds. And one more thing to think about...when a dog has a litter, they have more than one dog. Is there a time limit on when those puppies must be moved out?
2 people like this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
2 Dec 06
You raised some good questions. Hopefully someone from China will give us some answers, because I don't know myself. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
1 person likes this
• China
13 Nov 06
This is china, sacrificing the individual's interests for the mass's . sometime it's good, sometime its bad, but about the dog policy, I'm for it.
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
13 Nov 06
Hi, philip, you sound like you know what you're talking about. Have you had any dog problems you'd like to share?
1 person likes this
@rusty2rusty (6763)
• Defiance, Ohio
13 Nov 06
Doesn't China have a problem with to many stray dogs running rampaed? If that is the case. I am all for making restrictions. But what about people who breed their dogs? Is that not allowed anymore?
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
13 Nov 06
I don't know if breeders can still do that or not. Possibly they can because theirs would be called a business rather than just pets. And yes, they do have a lot of strays and people are protesting because so many of them are being destroyed.
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
13 Nov 06
I don't know if they do or not. That would help. However, should poor people be banned from dog ownership if they can't afford to have it taken care of that way? I don't know, I'm just asking for opinions.
2 people like this
• Defiance, Ohio
13 Nov 06
The ones that complain about to many animals being destoryed,Don't they relaize that to many aniamls cause problems in its self? I think spaying and neutering laws should be put in affect as well. Do you know if China has nay of them?
1 person likes this
13 Nov 06
I think it is very responsible of them to limit kids and dogs per family. The sight of stray dogs is not very pretty, it is quite sad and with the Olympic games coming up in less than 2 years time, I'm sure the government is doing anything to make sure there's no such problems over there.
2 people like this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
2 Dec 06
I know the stray dog problem is a sad one. In Tennessee there were lots of stray dogs. We were always seeing dogs smashed on the highways. I guess putting them to sleep is preferable to that.
1 person likes this
@sheraldea (263)
• Philippines
2 Dec 06
I guess it is better than annihilating them. They have their own reason - for safety reason. To avoid accidents. I don't own one actually for health reason but that doesn't mean I am against dogs. If you can handle taking care more than one dog so be it, otherwise, be content with one.
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
2 Dec 06
I agree that most people have no need for more than 1 dog. I have friends that used to have 4 dogs, 13 cats, and 2 large iguanas, and they kept them all inside their small home. It was more like going to a zoo than a home. Thankfully they have let attrition take its toll in lowering the population. No one needs all those pets.
1 person likes this
@KrauseHome (36448)
• United States
11 Jan 07
Wow... To me this almost sounds a little absurd and going overboard. I know Dogs can be expensive pets to own especially if they are Bigger, but why have a limit on them? It should be up to what you can afford, and are you capable to take on the responsibilities needed?
@missybal (4490)
• United States
12 Nov 06
Okay that sounds a little extreme. What are they doing with all the large dogs? Putting them to sleep?
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
12 Nov 06
Yes, that's what they're doing. Sad isn't it.
1 person likes this
@macubx (11414)
• Philippines
13 Nov 06
thats cool, it avoids too many dogs scattered around.
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
2 Dec 06
I don't think it sounds too cool for the poor dogs, do you? Thanks for your response.
1 person likes this
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
12 Nov 06
There is most probably some guiding factor behind this decision that we are unaware of, such as health and sanitation issues. After all, if you have a densely populated area with each family owning either a large dog or several smaller dogs then these dangers would exist. I believe that China has one of the highest populations on the planet. Nevertheless, it does seem a rather strange decision.
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
12 Nov 06
It must be very difficult living in China. So many people live in poverty, and they're all under such strict regulations from their government. I know they have a lot of people, but how can people keep going when all they do is work and have nothing, and now, on top of everything else, the government is wanting to take their dog away from them. People need a few bright spots in their lives, don't they?
1 person likes this
@Aeval39 (773)
• United States
12 Nov 06
Looks like they're trying very hard to limit the mouths they have to feed. As much as I love big dogs, and disagree with the general idea of limiting how many children and pets families have, I guess they don't have many other choices.
1 person likes this
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
12 Nov 06
I know there are many reasons why China does the things it does, but that doesn't mean I'd like to live under those conditions they impose. I'm glad to be an American.
1 person likes this
• China
13 Nov 06
f - f
good for enviroment~
@sbeauty (5865)
• United States
13 Nov 06
I wish you would have added more to your response to help the rest of us understand what's going on so that your government feels this ban is necessary. After all, you're the expert here! :O)
1 person likes this
@Ohara_1983 (4117)
• Kuwait
11 Jan 07
so sad to heard about that, specially to the dog lovers. i think it's to hard to stay in china now... but why? they didn't realize that dog also can help to the people, and also they are also a good buddy. or maybe they have reason because mostly they have people who eat the meat of dogs that's why they banned.
@olaff123 (433)
• Namibia
27 Jan 07
China is not the only country limiting the amount of dogs you may own. Botswana also limited the number of dogs per household to two.
@caribe (2465)
• United States
3 Dec 06
I could live with that, I think. In Nicaragua there are lots of dogs roaming around freely. I don't know if they belong to anyone or not. Most of the poor things are skinny and/or diseased. Maybe they had a similar problem to cause them to ban ownership of all large dogs, I don't know.
@Cortney (3980)
• United States
6 Dec 06
Just another thing that makes me happy to live in the US. I like being able to choose to own a large dog (I can't because of allergies) but it is nice to know that if I wanted to, i could.
• United States
7 Dec 06
It's not like the USA, is it? The country is so over populated, they can barely contain their people.